Incremental Prognostic Value of Coronary Hyper-intensity Plaque on Non-contrast Cardiac Magnetic Resonance with Global Longitudinal Strain for Major Adverse Cardiac Events in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome.

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Academic Radiology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-26 DOI:10.1016/j.acra.2024.08.031
Yumeng Sun, Wen Liu, Haiyang Xu, Lu Li, Tingting Li, Zhenjia Wang, Wei Yu, Yibin Xie, Debiao Li
{"title":"Incremental Prognostic Value of Coronary Hyper-intensity Plaque on Non-contrast Cardiac Magnetic Resonance with Global Longitudinal Strain for Major Adverse Cardiac Events in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome.","authors":"Yumeng Sun, Wen Liu, Haiyang Xu, Lu Li, Tingting Li, Zhenjia Wang, Wei Yu, Yibin Xie, Debiao Li","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2024.08.031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Rationale and objectives: </strong>This study aims to determine the long-term prognostic value of coronary hyper-intensity plaques and left ventricular (LV) myocardial strain for major adverse cardiac events (MACEs).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study prospectively recruited 71 patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). All patients underwent CMR before PCI to determine the plaque-to-myocardium signal intensity ratio and LV strains. The MACEs included all-cause death, reinfarction, and new congestive heart failure. Mann-Whitney U test and chi-square test to compare patients with and without MACE, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, Cox proportional hazards regression and C-statistics to assess prognosis, Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to define the cutoff value. A P value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cox proportional hazard analysis showed that plaque-to-myocardium signal intensity ratio and global longitudinal strain (GLS) were independently associated with MACEs (plaque-to-myocardium signal intensity ratio: hazard ratio (HR) 2.80, 95% CI, 1.25-6.26, P = 0.01; GLS: HR1.21, 95% CI, 1.07-1.38, P<0.01). ROC showed that a plaque-to-myocardium signal intensity ratio of 1.65 and a GLS of -10% were the best cutoff values for MACEs. The C-statistic values for plaque-to-myocardium signal intensity ratio, GLS, and plaque-to-myocardium signal intensity ratio+GLS for MACEs were 0.691, 0.792, and 0.825, respectively. Compared to GLS alone, the addition of plaque-to-myocardium signal intensity ratio to GLS increased the net reclassification index by 0.664 (P = 0.017).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Plaque-to-myocardium signal intensity ratio and GLS were significantly associated with MACEs. Adding plaque-to-myocardium signal intensity ratio to GLS substantially improved the prediction for MACEs. Our findings indicate that plaque-to-myocardium signal intensity ratio combined with GLS provides incremental prognostic value for MACEs.</p>","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":" ","pages":"102-111"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2024.08.031","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale and objectives: This study aims to determine the long-term prognostic value of coronary hyper-intensity plaques and left ventricular (LV) myocardial strain for major adverse cardiac events (MACEs).

Materials and methods: The study prospectively recruited 71 patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). All patients underwent CMR before PCI to determine the plaque-to-myocardium signal intensity ratio and LV strains. The MACEs included all-cause death, reinfarction, and new congestive heart failure. Mann-Whitney U test and chi-square test to compare patients with and without MACE, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, Cox proportional hazards regression and C-statistics to assess prognosis, Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to define the cutoff value. A P value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: Cox proportional hazard analysis showed that plaque-to-myocardium signal intensity ratio and global longitudinal strain (GLS) were independently associated with MACEs (plaque-to-myocardium signal intensity ratio: hazard ratio (HR) 2.80, 95% CI, 1.25-6.26, P = 0.01; GLS: HR1.21, 95% CI, 1.07-1.38, P<0.01). ROC showed that a plaque-to-myocardium signal intensity ratio of 1.65 and a GLS of -10% were the best cutoff values for MACEs. The C-statistic values for plaque-to-myocardium signal intensity ratio, GLS, and plaque-to-myocardium signal intensity ratio+GLS for MACEs were 0.691, 0.792, and 0.825, respectively. Compared to GLS alone, the addition of plaque-to-myocardium signal intensity ratio to GLS increased the net reclassification index by 0.664 (P = 0.017).

Conclusion: Plaque-to-myocardium signal intensity ratio and GLS were significantly associated with MACEs. Adding plaque-to-myocardium signal intensity ratio to GLS substantially improved the prediction for MACEs. Our findings indicate that plaque-to-myocardium signal intensity ratio combined with GLS provides incremental prognostic value for MACEs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非对比心脏磁共振成像中冠状动脉高密度斑块与整体纵向应变对急性冠状动脉综合征患者主要心脏不良事件的增量预后价值。
依据和目的:本研究旨在确定冠状动脉高密度斑块和左心室心肌应变对重大心脏不良事件(MACE)的长期预后价值:该研究前瞻性地招募了71名急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者。所有患者在进行 PCI 前均接受了 CMR 检查,以确定斑块与心肌的信号强度比和左心室应变。MACE包括全因死亡、再梗死和新发充血性心力衰竭。通过 Mann-Whitney U 检验和卡方检验比较有 MACE 和无 MACE 的患者,通过 Kaplan-Meier 生存分析、Cox 比例危险度回归和 C 统计分析评估预后,通过接收者操作特征(ROC)曲线分析确定截断值。结果的 P 值:Cox比例危险分析显示,斑块与心肌信号强度比和整体纵向应变(GLS)与MACEs独立相关(斑块与心肌信号强度比:危险比(HR)2.80,95% CI,1.25-6.26,P = 0.01;GLS:HR1.21,95% CI,1.07-1.38,P<0.01)。ROC显示,斑块与心肌信号强度比为1.65和GLS为-10%是MACEs的最佳临界值。斑块与心肌信号强度比、GLS 和斑块与心肌信号强度比+GLS 对 MACEs 的 C 统计量值分别为 0.691、0.792 和 0.825。与单独使用 GLS 相比,在 GLS 中加入斑块与心肌信号强度比可使净再分类指数增加 0.664(P = 0.017):斑块与心肌信号强度比和GLS与MACE显著相关。结论:斑块与心肌信号强度比和 GLS 与心肌梗死密切相关,斑块与心肌信号强度比与 GLS 的结合大大提高了对心肌梗死的预测能力。我们的研究结果表明,斑块与心肌的信号强度比值与GLS相结合,可为MACEs提供更多的预后价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Radiology
Academic Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
10.40%
发文量
432
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Academic Radiology publishes original reports of clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, image-guided interventions and related techniques. It also includes brief technical reports describing original observations, techniques, and instrumental developments; state-of-the-art reports on clinical issues, new technology and other topics of current medical importance; meta-analyses; scientific studies and opinions on radiologic education; and letters to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
Machine Learning Model for Risk Stratification of Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma Based on Radiopathomics. Non-invasive Assessment of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 Expression in Gastric Cancer Based on Deep Learning: A Computed Tomography-based Multicenter Study. Prediction of Radiation Therapy Induced Cardiovascular Toxicity from Pretreatment CT Images in Patients with Thoracic Malignancy via an Optimal Biomarker Approach. Unlocking Innovation: Promoting Scholarly Endeavors During Radiology Residency. Longitudinal Assessment of Pulmonary Involvement and Prognosis in Different Subtypes of COVID-19 Patients After One Year Using Low-Dose CT: A Prospective Observational Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1