Caregiver Characteristics and Barriers to Resource Use: Findings From a Rural State Caregiver Survey.

IF 2.1 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine Pub Date : 2024-08-27 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23337214241275050
Maija Reblin, Nancy Gell, Kelly Melekis, Christine M Proulx
{"title":"Caregiver Characteristics and Barriers to Resource Use: Findings From a Rural State Caregiver Survey.","authors":"Maija Reblin, Nancy Gell, Kelly Melekis, Christine M Proulx","doi":"10.1177/23337214241275050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Despite the key role family caregivers play in the US healthcare system, they are not systematically identified and tracked, limiting our knowledge about this important group. <b>Objective:</b> Our objective was to identify caregiver characteristics and barriers to service delivery in a primarily rural state. <b>Methods:</b> As part of a quality improvement project, a cross-sectional online survey was fielded in clinical and community settings. Participants included 85 self-identified adult caregivers of another adult with an illness, condition, or disability from within a US state healthcare network. Descriptive analyses were conducted, and inferential statistics were used to compare urban versus rural respondents and older versus younger respondents. <b>Results:</b> Caregivers were responsible for a wide range of care activities and particularly older caregivers spent a significant amount of time providing care. Older caregivers also reported significantly lower levels of burden compared to younger caregivers, yet both groups had clinically high levels on average. Caregivers reported receiving helpful emotional support, but needed more tangible support and were limited by availability and cost. <b>Conclusions:</b> There is a need to fund comprehensive caregiver programing and address caregivers' own social and physical health needs to reduce caregiver burden.</p>","PeriodicalId":52146,"journal":{"name":"Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11348341/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23337214241275050","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite the key role family caregivers play in the US healthcare system, they are not systematically identified and tracked, limiting our knowledge about this important group. Objective: Our objective was to identify caregiver characteristics and barriers to service delivery in a primarily rural state. Methods: As part of a quality improvement project, a cross-sectional online survey was fielded in clinical and community settings. Participants included 85 self-identified adult caregivers of another adult with an illness, condition, or disability from within a US state healthcare network. Descriptive analyses were conducted, and inferential statistics were used to compare urban versus rural respondents and older versus younger respondents. Results: Caregivers were responsible for a wide range of care activities and particularly older caregivers spent a significant amount of time providing care. Older caregivers also reported significantly lower levels of burden compared to younger caregivers, yet both groups had clinically high levels on average. Caregivers reported receiving helpful emotional support, but needed more tangible support and were limited by availability and cost. Conclusions: There is a need to fund comprehensive caregiver programing and address caregivers' own social and physical health needs to reduce caregiver burden.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护理人员的特点和资源使用障碍:农村地区护理人员调查的结果。
背景:尽管家庭护理人员在美国医疗保健系统中扮演着重要角色,但他们并没有被系统地识别和跟踪,这限制了我们对这一重要群体的了解。目标: 我们的目标是确定照顾者的特征以及他们在医疗服务中遇到的障碍:我们的目标是在一个以农村为主的州确定照顾者的特征和提供服务的障碍。方法: 作为质量改进项目的一部分,我们对护理人员进行了调查:作为质量改进项目的一部分,我们在临床和社区环境中开展了一项横断面在线调查。调查对象包括来自美国某州医疗保健网络中的 85 位自称是另一位患有疾病、病症或残疾的成年人的成年照顾者。调查进行了描述性分析,并使用推理统计对城市和农村受访者以及年龄较大和较年轻的受访者进行了比较。研究结果护理人员负责各种护理活动,尤其是老年护理人员花费大量时间提供护理。老年护理人员的负担水平也明显低于年轻护理人员,但两个群体的平均负担水平都很高。照护者表示得到了有益的情感支持,但需要更多有形的支持,并受到可用性和成本的限制。结论:有必要资助全面的照顾者计划,并解决照顾者自身的社会和身体健康需求,以减轻照顾者的负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine
Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine Medicine-Geriatrics and Gerontology
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
3.70%
发文量
119
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine (GGM) is an interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed open access journal where scholars from a variety of disciplines present their work focusing on the psychological, behavioral, social, and biological aspects of aging, and public health services and research related to aging. The journal addresses a wide variety of topics related to health services research in gerontology and geriatrics. GGM seeks to be one of the world’s premier Open Access outlets for gerontological academic research. As such, GGM does not limit content due to page budgets or thematic significance. Papers will be subjected to rigorous peer review but will be selected solely on the basis of whether the research is sound and deserves publication. By virtue of not restricting papers to a narrow discipline, GGM facilitates the discovery of the connections between papers.
期刊最新文献
The Effect of Levels of Leisure-Time Physical Activity on Cognitive Functions Among Older Adults with Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Longitudinal Analysis. Dental Hygienists' Awareness of Medication-Related Osteonecrosis of the Jaw in Private Dental Clinics in Japan. Understanding the Relationship Between Adverse Medication Use and Falls Among Older Patients Receiving Home Medical Care: OHCARE study. A Longitudinal Examination of Post-COVID-19 Mortality in Residents in Long-Term Care Homes. Development and Validation of a Risk Prediction Model for Frailty in Patients with Chronic Diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1