Frontal Activity of Recent Suicide Attempters: EEG spectrum Power Performing Raven Task.

Nafee Rasouli, Seyed Kazem Malakouti, Masoumeh Bayat, Firouzeh Mahjoubnavaz, Niloofar Fallahinia, Reza Khosrowabadi
{"title":"Frontal Activity of Recent Suicide Attempters: EEG spectrum Power Performing Raven Task.","authors":"Nafee Rasouli, Seyed Kazem Malakouti, Masoumeh Bayat, Firouzeh Mahjoubnavaz, Niloofar Fallahinia, Reza Khosrowabadi","doi":"10.1177/15500594241273125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background:</i> Deficits in problem-solving may be related to vulnerability to suicidal behavior. We aimed to identify the electroencephalographic (EEG) power spectrum associated with the performance of the Raven as a reasoning/problem-solving task among individuals with recent suicide attempts. <i>Methods</i>: This study with the case-control method, consisted of 61 participants who were assigned to three groups: Suicide attempt + Major Depressive Disorder (SA + MDD), Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), and Healthy Control (HC). All participants underwent clinical evaluations and problem-solving abilities. Subsequently, EEG signals were recorded while performing the Raven task. <i>Results</i>: The SA + MDD and MDD groups were significantly different from the HC group in terms of anxiety, reasons for life, and hopelessness. Regarding brain oscillations in performing the raven task, increased theta, gamma, and betha power extending over the frontal areas, including anterior prefrontal cortex, dlPFC, pre-SMA, inferior frontal cortex, and medial prefrontal cortex, was significant in SA + MDD compared with other groups. The alpha wave was more prominent in the left frontal, particularly in dlPFC in SA + MDD. Compared to the MDD group, the SA + MDD group had a shorter reaction time, while their response accuracy did not differ significantly. <i>Conclusions</i>: Suicidal patients have more frontal activity in planning and executive function than the two other groups. Nevertheless, it seems that reduced activity in the left frontal region, which plays a crucial role in managing emotional distress, can contribute to suicidal tendencies among vulnerable individuals. <i>Limitation</i> The small sample size and chosen difficult trials for the Raven task were the most limitations of the study.</p>","PeriodicalId":93940,"journal":{"name":"Clinical EEG and neuroscience","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical EEG and neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15500594241273125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Deficits in problem-solving may be related to vulnerability to suicidal behavior. We aimed to identify the electroencephalographic (EEG) power spectrum associated with the performance of the Raven as a reasoning/problem-solving task among individuals with recent suicide attempts. Methods: This study with the case-control method, consisted of 61 participants who were assigned to three groups: Suicide attempt + Major Depressive Disorder (SA + MDD), Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), and Healthy Control (HC). All participants underwent clinical evaluations and problem-solving abilities. Subsequently, EEG signals were recorded while performing the Raven task. Results: The SA + MDD and MDD groups were significantly different from the HC group in terms of anxiety, reasons for life, and hopelessness. Regarding brain oscillations in performing the raven task, increased theta, gamma, and betha power extending over the frontal areas, including anterior prefrontal cortex, dlPFC, pre-SMA, inferior frontal cortex, and medial prefrontal cortex, was significant in SA + MDD compared with other groups. The alpha wave was more prominent in the left frontal, particularly in dlPFC in SA + MDD. Compared to the MDD group, the SA + MDD group had a shorter reaction time, while their response accuracy did not differ significantly. Conclusions: Suicidal patients have more frontal activity in planning and executive function than the two other groups. Nevertheless, it seems that reduced activity in the left frontal region, which plays a crucial role in managing emotional distress, can contribute to suicidal tendencies among vulnerable individuals. Limitation The small sample size and chosen difficult trials for the Raven task were the most limitations of the study.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
近期自杀倾向者的额叶活动:执行乌鸦任务时的脑电图频谱功率
背景:问题解决能力的缺陷可能与自杀行为的脆弱性有关。我们的目的是在近期有自杀企图的人中确定与瑞文推理/问题解决任务表现相关的脑电图(EEG)功率谱。研究方法本研究采用病例对照法,将 61 名参与者分为三组:自杀未遂+重度抑郁障碍组(SA + MDD)、重度抑郁障碍组(MDD)和健康对照组(HC)。所有参与者都接受了临床评估和问题解决能力评估。随后,在执行 Raven 任务时记录了脑电信号。研究结果在焦虑、生活理由和绝望方面,SA + MDD 组和 MDD 组与 HC 组有显著差异。在执行乌鸦任务时的大脑振荡方面,SA + MDD 组与其他组相比,前额区(包括前额皮质前部、dlPFC、SMA 前部、额皮质下部和内侧前额皮质)的θ、γ和 betha 功率显著增加。α波在左额叶更为突出,尤其是在 SA + MDD 组的 dlPFC。与 MDD 组相比,SA + MDD 组的反应时间更短,而他们的反应准确性没有显著差异。结论与其他两组相比,自杀倾向患者在计划和执行功能方面的额叶活动更多。然而,左侧额叶在控制情绪困扰方面起着至关重要的作用,它的活动减少似乎会导致易受伤害的人产生自杀倾向。局限性 本研究的最大局限性在于样本量较小,且选择的瑞文任务试验难度较大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mismatch Negativity as an Index of Auditory Short-Term Plasticity: Associations with Cortisol, Inflammation, and Gray Matter Volume in Youth at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis. Early Impairment of Face Perception in Post-Stroke Depression: An ERP Study. Electrocortical Profiles in Relation to Childhood Adversity and Depression Severity: A Preliminary Report. From the Laboratory to the Real-World: The Role of Mismatch Negativity in Psychosis. Speech Mismatch Negativity (MMN) in Schizophrenia with Auditory Verbal Hallucinations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1