Effect of health education provided to couples on maternal knowledge, attitude and use of maternity waiting homes in rural Ethiopia: A cluster-randomized trial

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Midwifery Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI:10.1016/j.midw.2024.104153
Teklemariam Ergat Yarinbab , Hailay Abrha Gesesew , Tefera Belachew
{"title":"Effect of health education provided to couples on maternal knowledge, attitude and use of maternity waiting homes in rural Ethiopia: A cluster-randomized trial","authors":"Teklemariam Ergat Yarinbab ,&nbsp;Hailay Abrha Gesesew ,&nbsp;Tefera Belachew","doi":"10.1016/j.midw.2024.104153","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Maternity waiting home (MWH) has been advocated as an approach to improve women's access to obstetric services in low-resource settings; however, its use remains low. This study investigated the effectiveness of couple-based health education on maternal knowledge, attitudes, and use of MWHs in rural Ethiopia.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A total of 320 couples from 16 clusters were allocated to the intervention and control groups using restricted randomization. Participants in the intervention group received group health education, home visits, and information flyers along with usual care, whereas those in the control group received usual care. Statistical differences were estimated using the chi-squared test. The impact of the intervention was evaluated using generalized linear regression and difference-in-differences models.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Baseline and endline data were collected from the 320 couples. The intervention increased knowledge by 37.5 % (95 % CI: 32.2 % - 42.8 %), attitude by 33.8 % (95 % CI: 28.8 %–39.2 %), and utilization of MWH by 32.9 % (95 % CI: 27.9 %–38.2 %) among women. In addition, compared to those in the control group, women in the intervention group were almost six times more likely to have increased knowledge of MWH (AOR 5.74, 95 % CI: 3.51–9.38), four times more likely to have improved attitudes of MWH (AOR 4.45, 95 % CI: 2.78 -7.13), and four times more likely to stay at MWH (AOR 4.45, 95 % CI: 2.78 -7.12).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Providing health education to couples can improve maternal knowledge, attitudes, and the use of MWHs. Policymakers and healthcare cadres can use the current intervention strategy to enhance maternal health services, particularly MWHs, in rural Ethiopia.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18495,"journal":{"name":"Midwifery","volume":"138 ","pages":"Article 104153"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266613824002365","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Maternity waiting home (MWH) has been advocated as an approach to improve women's access to obstetric services in low-resource settings; however, its use remains low. This study investigated the effectiveness of couple-based health education on maternal knowledge, attitudes, and use of MWHs in rural Ethiopia.

Methods

A total of 320 couples from 16 clusters were allocated to the intervention and control groups using restricted randomization. Participants in the intervention group received group health education, home visits, and information flyers along with usual care, whereas those in the control group received usual care. Statistical differences were estimated using the chi-squared test. The impact of the intervention was evaluated using generalized linear regression and difference-in-differences models.

Results

Baseline and endline data were collected from the 320 couples. The intervention increased knowledge by 37.5 % (95 % CI: 32.2 % - 42.8 %), attitude by 33.8 % (95 % CI: 28.8 %–39.2 %), and utilization of MWH by 32.9 % (95 % CI: 27.9 %–38.2 %) among women. In addition, compared to those in the control group, women in the intervention group were almost six times more likely to have increased knowledge of MWH (AOR 5.74, 95 % CI: 3.51–9.38), four times more likely to have improved attitudes of MWH (AOR 4.45, 95 % CI: 2.78 -7.13), and four times more likely to stay at MWH (AOR 4.45, 95 % CI: 2.78 -7.12).

Conclusion

Providing health education to couples can improve maternal knowledge, attitudes, and the use of MWHs. Policymakers and healthcare cadres can use the current intervention strategy to enhance maternal health services, particularly MWHs, in rural Ethiopia.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在埃塞俄比亚农村地区,向夫妇提供健康教育对孕产妇知识、态度和使用待产之家的影响:分组随机试验
背景待产之家(MWH)一直被认为是改善低资源环境中妇女获得产科服务的一种方法,但其使用率仍然很低。本研究调查了以夫妇为基础的健康教育对埃塞俄比亚农村地区孕产妇知识、态度和待产之家使用情况的影响。方法采用限制性随机法将 16 个群组的 320 对夫妇分配到干预组和对照组。干预组的参与者在接受常规护理的同时还接受了集体健康教育、家访和信息传单,而对照组的参与者则接受常规护理。统计差异采用卡方检验进行估计。使用广义线性回归和差异模型对干预的影响进行了评估。干预措施使妇女的知识水平提高了 37.5 %(95 % CI:32.2 % - 42.8 %),态度水平提高了 33.8 %(95 % CI:28.8 % - 39.2 %),对产妇保健的利用率提高了 32.9 %(95 % CI:27.9 % - 38.2 %)。此外,与对照组相比,干预组妇女对产妇保健知识的了解增加了近六倍(AOR 5.74,95 % CI:3.51-9.38),对产妇保健态度的改善增加了四倍(AOR 4.45,95 % CI:2.78 -7.13),留在 MWH 的可能性增加了四倍(AOR 4.45,95 % CI:2.78 -7.12)。政策制定者和医疗保健人员可以利用当前的干预策略来加强埃塞俄比亚农村地区的孕产妇保健服务,尤其是产妇保健服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Midwifery
Midwifery 医学-护理
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.40%
发文量
221
审稿时长
13.4 weeks
期刊介绍: Midwifery publishes the latest peer reviewed international research to inform the safety, quality, outcomes and experiences of pregnancy, birth and maternity care for childbearing women, their babies and families. The journal’s publications support midwives and maternity care providers to explore and develop their knowledge, skills and attitudes informed by best available evidence. Midwifery provides an international, interdisciplinary forum for the publication, dissemination and discussion of advances in evidence, controversies and current research, and promotes continuing education through publication of systematic and other scholarly reviews and updates. Midwifery articles cover the cultural, clinical, psycho-social, sociological, epidemiological, education, managerial, workforce, organizational and technological areas of practice in preconception, maternal and infant care. The journal welcomes the highest quality scholarly research that employs rigorous methodology. Midwifery is a leading international journal in midwifery and maternal health with a current impact factor of 1.861 (© Thomson Reuters Journal Citation Reports 2016) and employs a double-blind peer review process.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board How valuable is an implementation toolkit for midwives? An exploratory study The work of midwives: The socio-institutional theory of the meaning of midwives’ work-life balance International News January 2025 “With an unwanted pregnancy, we are looking for midwives in the neighbourhood to show us what to do.” Stakeholder perceptions of midwife-led woman-centred comprehensive abortion care in the province of Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo: a qualitative descriptive study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1