The length of fracture process zone deciphers variations of rock tensile strength

IF 7 1区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences Pub Date : 2024-08-27 DOI:10.1016/j.ijrmms.2024.105885
Saeed Aligholi , A.R. Torabi , Mehdi Serati , Hossein Masoumi
{"title":"The length of fracture process zone deciphers variations of rock tensile strength","authors":"Saeed Aligholi ,&nbsp;A.R. Torabi ,&nbsp;Mehdi Serati ,&nbsp;Hossein Masoumi","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrmms.2024.105885","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Tensile strength is one of the most critical design factors in many rock engineering projects. However, despite many available testing techniques, an accurate estimation of the true tensile strength of quasi-brittle rock-like materials is yet a controversial problem since it can vary by the shape and size of a test specimen, the adopted test method, and applied loading conditions. Different studies have tried to address this issue by providing (mainly empirical) laws for determining variations of rock tensile strength as a function of a particular test parameter such as specimen size. In this study, however, a new general approach is presented that can decipher the tensile strength variations of rock under various testing conditions. Using coupled Finite Fracture Mechanics (FFM), it is first proved that the length of the Fracture Process Zone (FPZ) can be determined with accuracy and ease using the energy criterion of coupled FFM. Then, the length of FPZ is used in the stress criterion of coupled FFM to determine rock tensile strength. The failure stress of a material is then proved to be mainly a function of the FPZ length following a power law originated from the Linear Elastic Fracture Mechanics (LEFM). The results assist in deciphering variations of rock tensile strength related to the sample size and test method.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54941,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences","volume":"182 ","pages":"Article 105885"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1365160924002508/pdfft?md5=851e6eaec9c9908fc9c3a3a6a0f16f74&pid=1-s2.0-S1365160924002508-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1365160924002508","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Tensile strength is one of the most critical design factors in many rock engineering projects. However, despite many available testing techniques, an accurate estimation of the true tensile strength of quasi-brittle rock-like materials is yet a controversial problem since it can vary by the shape and size of a test specimen, the adopted test method, and applied loading conditions. Different studies have tried to address this issue by providing (mainly empirical) laws for determining variations of rock tensile strength as a function of a particular test parameter such as specimen size. In this study, however, a new general approach is presented that can decipher the tensile strength variations of rock under various testing conditions. Using coupled Finite Fracture Mechanics (FFM), it is first proved that the length of the Fracture Process Zone (FPZ) can be determined with accuracy and ease using the energy criterion of coupled FFM. Then, the length of FPZ is used in the stress criterion of coupled FFM to determine rock tensile strength. The failure stress of a material is then proved to be mainly a function of the FPZ length following a power law originated from the Linear Elastic Fracture Mechanics (LEFM). The results assist in deciphering variations of rock tensile strength related to the sample size and test method.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
断裂过程区的长度解读岩石抗拉强度的变化
抗拉强度是许多岩石工程项目中最关键的设计因素之一。然而,尽管有许多可用的测试技术,但准确估算准脆性类岩石材料的真实抗拉强度仍是一个有争议的问题,因为抗拉强度会因测试样本的形状和尺寸、采用的测试方法以及应用的加载条件而变化。为了解决这个问题,不同的研究都提供了(主要是经验)法则,用于确定岩石抗拉强度随试样尺寸等特定测试参数的变化。然而,本研究提出了一种新的通用方法,可以破解岩石在各种测试条件下的抗拉强度变化。利用耦合有限断裂力学(FFM),首先证明了利用耦合有限断裂力学的能量准则可以准确、轻松地确定断裂过程区(FPZ)的长度。然后,在耦合 FFM 的应力准则中使用 FPZ 长度来确定岩石抗拉强度。材料的破坏应力被证明主要是 FPZ 长度的函数,遵循线性弹性断裂力学(LEFM)的幂律。这些结果有助于解读与样本大小和测试方法有关的岩石抗拉强度变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
196
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences focuses on original research, new developments, site measurements, and case studies within the fields of rock mechanics and rock engineering. Serving as an international platform, it showcases high-quality papers addressing rock mechanics and the application of its principles and techniques in mining and civil engineering projects situated on or within rock masses. These projects encompass a wide range, including slopes, open-pit mines, quarries, shafts, tunnels, caverns, underground mines, metro systems, dams, hydro-electric stations, geothermal energy, petroleum engineering, and radioactive waste disposal. The journal welcomes submissions on various topics, with particular interest in theoretical advancements, analytical and numerical methods, rock testing, site investigation, and case studies.
期刊最新文献
Experimental analysis of rock mass transport during dolomite and gas outburst Experimental study and model improvement on coal permeability: The influence of effective stress, slip effect, and water content Effect of hydro-chemical corrosion on mechanical properties of red sandstone under uniaxial and triaxial compression Improvement of granite and concrete cutting efficiency using mixed-abrasives Fracture behavior of thermally treated granite under compression-shear loading
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1