Investigating Informational Text Read-alouds in Greek Kindergarten Classrooms: Differences According to Text Structures

IF 2.3 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Early Childhood Education Journal Pub Date : 2024-08-27 DOI:10.1007/s10643-024-01749-y
Elissavet Chlapana, Emmanouil Ntagkinis
{"title":"Investigating Informational Text Read-alouds in Greek Kindergarten Classrooms: Differences According to Text Structures","authors":"Elissavet Chlapana, Emmanouil Ntagkinis","doi":"10.1007/s10643-024-01749-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The purpose of the present study was to examine teachers’ practices for reading aloud informational texts to kindergarteners and describe whether these are affected by the different text structures. Ten (10) teachers working in public kindergartens located in different regions of Greece participated in the study. The sample teachers read informational texts that were created to represent the most common informational text structures: compare-contrast, description, cause-effect, problem-solution, and sequence. Read-aloud sessions were recorded and analyzed according to parameters that refer to well-documented read-aloud styles and ensure discussion quality and text comprehension. Indicative parameters were the timing of the discussion, teachers’ prompts and techniques for enhancing children’s language production, and their verbal participation in the text discussion. Data analysis showed that the teachers’ read-aloud practices stand more in favor of a dialogic reading style. Furthermore, the predominance of low cognitive demand questions and the children’s few initiatives to ask their own questions were representative of the discussion quality. There were also differences in the teachers’ read-aloud practices according to the structure of the texts, with the compare-contract structure being the most challenging one for the teachers and the children. The results of the present study have several implications for improving teachers’ read-aloud practices and kindergarteners’ text comprehension.</p>","PeriodicalId":47818,"journal":{"name":"Early Childhood Education Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Early Childhood Education Journal","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-024-01749-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to examine teachers’ practices for reading aloud informational texts to kindergarteners and describe whether these are affected by the different text structures. Ten (10) teachers working in public kindergartens located in different regions of Greece participated in the study. The sample teachers read informational texts that were created to represent the most common informational text structures: compare-contrast, description, cause-effect, problem-solution, and sequence. Read-aloud sessions were recorded and analyzed according to parameters that refer to well-documented read-aloud styles and ensure discussion quality and text comprehension. Indicative parameters were the timing of the discussion, teachers’ prompts and techniques for enhancing children’s language production, and their verbal participation in the text discussion. Data analysis showed that the teachers’ read-aloud practices stand more in favor of a dialogic reading style. Furthermore, the predominance of low cognitive demand questions and the children’s few initiatives to ask their own questions were representative of the discussion quality. There were also differences in the teachers’ read-aloud practices according to the structure of the texts, with the compare-contract structure being the most challenging one for the teachers and the children. The results of the present study have several implications for improving teachers’ read-aloud practices and kindergarteners’ text comprehension.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
调查希腊幼儿园课堂中的信息文本朗读:文本结构的差异
本研究的目的是考察教师为幼儿园儿童朗读信息文本的做法,并描述这些做法是否受到不同文本结构的影响。十(10)名在希腊不同地区公立幼儿园工作的教师参与了本研究。样本教师朗读了代表最常见信息文本结构的信息文本:比较-对比、描述、因果关系、问题-解决方案和顺序。朗读过程被记录下来,并根据有据可查的朗读风格参数进行分析,以确保讨论质量和文本理解。这些参数包括讨论的时间安排、教师的提示和提高儿童语言能力的技巧,以及儿童对文本讨论的口头参与。数据分析显示,教师的朗读方式更倾向于对话式阅读。此外,低认知要求的问题居多,儿童很少主动提出自己的问题,这也代表了讨论的质量。根据课文结构的不同,教师的朗读实践也存在差异,其中比较--契约结构对教师和儿童来说都是最具挑战性的结构。本研究的结果对改善教师的朗读实践和幼儿园儿童的文本理解能力有几方面的启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Early Childhood Education Journal
Early Childhood Education Journal EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
14.80%
发文量
124
期刊介绍: Early Childhood Education Journal is a professional publication of original peer-reviewed articles that reflect exemplary practices in the field of contemporary early childhood education. Articles cover the social, physical, emotional, and intellectual development of children age birth through 8, analyzing issues, trends, and practices from an educational perspective. The journal publishes feature-length articles that skillfully blend 1) theory, research, and practice, 2) descriptions of outstanding early childhood programs worldwide, and 3) quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods research. Early Childhood Education Journal is of interest not only to classroom teachers, child care providers, college and university faculty, and administrators, but also to other professionals in psychology, health care, family relations, and social services dedicated to the care of young children. Areas of Emphasis: International studies; Educational programs in diverse settings; Early learning across multiple domains; Projects demonstrating inter-professional collaboration; Qualitative and quantitative research and case studies; Best practices in early childhood teacher education; Theory, research, and practice relating to professional development; Family, school, and community relationships; Investigations related to curriculum and instruction; Articles that link theory and best practices; Reviews of research with well-articulated connections to the field
期刊最新文献
Scribbling and Early Literacy Connections: How do Early Childhood Teachers Perceive Scribbles? Perceptions of Conditions that Characterize Projects as a Development Strategy: A Phenomenographical Study of Eleven Swedish Preschool Development Projects The Impact of Acquaintance Meetings on Children’s School Adjustment and Teachers’ Burnout in Preschools Math Talk in Play Contexts: Relations Between Parent and Child Math Language and Early Math Skills Translating Ideas into Language: High-Impact Strategies to Nurture Children′s Creative Composing in Early Childhood Classrooms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1