Systematic Review: Practices and Programs in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Transition Care.

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Pub Date : 2024-08-28 DOI:10.1093/ibd/izae190
Patrick Chan, Jack McNamara, Angharad Vernon-Roberts, Edward M Giles, Rachael Havrlant, Britt Christensen, Amanda Thomas, Astrid-Jane Williams
{"title":"Systematic Review: Practices and Programs in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Transition Care.","authors":"Patrick Chan, Jack McNamara, Angharad Vernon-Roberts, Edward M Giles, Rachael Havrlant, Britt Christensen, Amanda Thomas, Astrid-Jane Williams","doi":"10.1093/ibd/izae190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adolescents with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) transitioning to adult care is often deemed a challenging period for patients, their carers, and practitioners. The use of structured transition programs is increasingly incorporated into standards of care, yet the optimal format remains unknown. The aim of this study is to carry out a systematic review of structured transition programs and their components to assess the impact on disease-specific and transition-related outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review (PROSPERO ID: CRD42023380846) was performed across 4 databases (PubMed, CINAHL, CENTRAL, and EMBASE) and relevant publications up to March 2023 were reviewed. Studies evaluating either a structured transition program or targeted intervention which also measured a transition- and/or disease-related outcomes were included for evaluation in accordance with the PRISMA statement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three thousand four hundred and thirty-two articles were identified and 29 included in the final review. A structured transition program was reported in 21 studies and 8 investigated discrete transition-related interventions. The key transition-related outcomes included knowledge, self-efficacy, adherence, clinic attendance, and transition readiness which overall improved with the use of structured transition programs. Similarly, interventions consistently improved relapse/admission rates and corticosteroid use across most studies, although the benefit in hospitalization and surgical rates was less evident. Methodological limitations alongside heterogeneity in study design and outcome measures impacted on the quality of the evidence as assessed by the GRADE rating.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Transition- and medical-related outcomes for adolescents with IBD have been shown to benefit from structured transition programs but practices vary greatly between centers. There is no current standardized transition model for patients with IBD prompting further research to guide future development of guidelines and models of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":13623,"journal":{"name":"Inflammatory Bowel Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inflammatory Bowel Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ibd/izae190","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Adolescents with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) transitioning to adult care is often deemed a challenging period for patients, their carers, and practitioners. The use of structured transition programs is increasingly incorporated into standards of care, yet the optimal format remains unknown. The aim of this study is to carry out a systematic review of structured transition programs and their components to assess the impact on disease-specific and transition-related outcomes.

Methods: A systematic review (PROSPERO ID: CRD42023380846) was performed across 4 databases (PubMed, CINAHL, CENTRAL, and EMBASE) and relevant publications up to March 2023 were reviewed. Studies evaluating either a structured transition program or targeted intervention which also measured a transition- and/or disease-related outcomes were included for evaluation in accordance with the PRISMA statement.

Results: Three thousand four hundred and thirty-two articles were identified and 29 included in the final review. A structured transition program was reported in 21 studies and 8 investigated discrete transition-related interventions. The key transition-related outcomes included knowledge, self-efficacy, adherence, clinic attendance, and transition readiness which overall improved with the use of structured transition programs. Similarly, interventions consistently improved relapse/admission rates and corticosteroid use across most studies, although the benefit in hospitalization and surgical rates was less evident. Methodological limitations alongside heterogeneity in study design and outcome measures impacted on the quality of the evidence as assessed by the GRADE rating.

Conclusions: Transition- and medical-related outcomes for adolescents with IBD have been shown to benefit from structured transition programs but practices vary greatly between centers. There is no current standardized transition model for patients with IBD prompting further research to guide future development of guidelines and models of care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
系统综述:炎症性肠病过渡护理的实践与计划。
背景:患有炎症性肠病(IBD)的青少年向成人护理过渡通常被认为是对患者、其护理者和从业人员具有挑战性的时期。结构化过渡方案的使用越来越多地被纳入到护理标准中,但最佳形式仍是未知数。本研究旨在对结构化过渡计划及其组成部分进行系统性回顾,以评估其对疾病特异性和过渡相关结果的影响:在 4 个数据库(PubMed、CINAHL、CENTRAL 和 EMBASE)中进行了系统回顾(PROSPERO ID:CRD42023380846),并回顾了截至 2023 年 3 月的相关出版物。根据 PRISMA 声明,纳入了评估结构化过渡计划或有针对性干预的研究,这些研究还测量了与过渡和/或疾病相关的结果:结果:共确定了 342 篇文章,其中 29 篇被纳入最终审查。21 项研究报告了结构化过渡计划,8 项研究调查了与过渡相关的独立干预措施。与过渡相关的主要结果包括知识、自我效能、依从性、门诊出勤率和过渡准备,使用结构化过渡计划后,这些结果总体上有所改善。同样,在大多数研究中,干预措施持续改善了复发率/入院率和皮质类固醇的使用,但住院率和手术率的改善并不明显。方法学上的局限性以及研究设计和结果测量的异质性影响了 GRADE 评级所评估的证据质量:结论:研究表明,IBD青少年患者的转归和医疗相关结果可从结构化的转归计划中获益,但不同中心的做法大相径庭。目前还没有针对 IBD 患者的标准化过渡模式,因此需要进一步开展研究,以指导未来指南和护理模式的制定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
6.10%
发文量
462
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Inflammatory Bowel Diseases® supports the mission of the Crohn''s & Colitis Foundation by bringing the most impactful and cutting edge clinical topics and research findings related to inflammatory bowel diseases to clinicians and researchers working in IBD and related fields. The Journal is committed to publishing on innovative topics that influence the future of clinical care, treatment, and research.
期刊最新文献
Reply: MIND the Gap: Psychiatric Conditions in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Adults and Elderly: The Use of Selected Non-IBD Medication Examined in a Nationwide Cohort Study. Proactive Infliximab Monitoring Improves the Rates of Transmural Remission in Crohn's Disease: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis. Clusters of Disease Activity and Early Risk Factors of Clinical Course of Pediatric Crohn's Disease. Automatic Segmentation and Radiomics for Identification and Activity Assessment of CTE Lesions in Crohn's Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1