Michelle You , Cutter A. Lindbergh , Renaud La Joie , Emily W. Paolillo , Rowan Saloner , Valentina Diaz , Devyn L. Cotter , Samantha Walters , Marie Altendahl , Adam M. Staffaroni , Joel H. Kramer , Leslie S. Gaynor , Kaitlin B. Casaletto
{"title":"Predicting brain atrophy and cognitive aging trajectories with baseline subjective cognitive concerns in cognitively normal older adults","authors":"Michelle You , Cutter A. Lindbergh , Renaud La Joie , Emily W. Paolillo , Rowan Saloner , Valentina Diaz , Devyn L. Cotter , Samantha Walters , Marie Altendahl , Adam M. Staffaroni , Joel H. Kramer , Leslie S. Gaynor , Kaitlin B. Casaletto","doi":"10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2024.08.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Subjective cognitive concerns (SCC) are common even in cognitively normal older adults who lack objectively-detectable deficits on standard neuropsychological evaluation. The clinical relevance of these concerns, particularly considering the nature of concerns (e.g., memory versus non-memory), remains unclear. Thus, we examined whether baseline memory and non-memory SCC relate to longitudinal change in brain volume and neuropsychological test performance in 476 functionally-intact, objectively unimpaired older adults (<em>M</em><sub><em>age</em></sub> = 72y, 56 % female, follow-up time = 1 – 9 years). Mixed-effects models revealed that both higher baseline memory and non-memory SCC predicted greater atrophy in total gray matter and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex atrophy over time, while only memory SCC predicted steeper medial temporal lobe atrophy. Regarding neuropsychological performance, higher non-memory SCC predicted decline in processing speed performance, while memory SCC did not predict neuropsychological trajectories. SCC are a risk factor for more adverse brain and cognitive aging trajectories, even in functionally-intact, seemingly cognitively normal older adults.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19110,"journal":{"name":"Neurobiology of Aging","volume":"143 ","pages":"Pages 1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurobiology of Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0197458024001350","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Subjective cognitive concerns (SCC) are common even in cognitively normal older adults who lack objectively-detectable deficits on standard neuropsychological evaluation. The clinical relevance of these concerns, particularly considering the nature of concerns (e.g., memory versus non-memory), remains unclear. Thus, we examined whether baseline memory and non-memory SCC relate to longitudinal change in brain volume and neuropsychological test performance in 476 functionally-intact, objectively unimpaired older adults (Mage = 72y, 56 % female, follow-up time = 1 – 9 years). Mixed-effects models revealed that both higher baseline memory and non-memory SCC predicted greater atrophy in total gray matter and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex atrophy over time, while only memory SCC predicted steeper medial temporal lobe atrophy. Regarding neuropsychological performance, higher non-memory SCC predicted decline in processing speed performance, while memory SCC did not predict neuropsychological trajectories. SCC are a risk factor for more adverse brain and cognitive aging trajectories, even in functionally-intact, seemingly cognitively normal older adults.
期刊介绍:
Neurobiology of Aging publishes the results of studies in behavior, biochemistry, cell biology, endocrinology, molecular biology, morphology, neurology, neuropathology, pharmacology, physiology and protein chemistry in which the primary emphasis involves mechanisms of nervous system changes with age or diseases associated with age. Reviews and primary research articles are included, occasionally accompanied by open peer commentary. Letters to the Editor and brief communications are also acceptable. Brief reports of highly time-sensitive material are usually treated as rapid communications in which case editorial review is completed within six weeks and publication scheduled for the next available issue.