Predicting brain atrophy and cognitive aging trajectories with baseline subjective cognitive concerns in cognitively normal older adults

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Neurobiology of Aging Pub Date : 2024-08-23 DOI:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2024.08.006
Michelle You , Cutter A. Lindbergh , Renaud La Joie , Emily W. Paolillo , Rowan Saloner , Valentina Diaz , Devyn L. Cotter , Samantha Walters , Marie Altendahl , Adam M. Staffaroni , Joel H. Kramer , Leslie S. Gaynor , Kaitlin B. Casaletto
{"title":"Predicting brain atrophy and cognitive aging trajectories with baseline subjective cognitive concerns in cognitively normal older adults","authors":"Michelle You ,&nbsp;Cutter A. Lindbergh ,&nbsp;Renaud La Joie ,&nbsp;Emily W. Paolillo ,&nbsp;Rowan Saloner ,&nbsp;Valentina Diaz ,&nbsp;Devyn L. Cotter ,&nbsp;Samantha Walters ,&nbsp;Marie Altendahl ,&nbsp;Adam M. Staffaroni ,&nbsp;Joel H. Kramer ,&nbsp;Leslie S. Gaynor ,&nbsp;Kaitlin B. Casaletto","doi":"10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2024.08.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Subjective cognitive concerns (SCC) are common even in cognitively normal older adults who lack objectively-detectable deficits on standard neuropsychological evaluation. The clinical relevance of these concerns, particularly considering the nature of concerns (e.g., memory versus non-memory), remains unclear. Thus, we examined whether baseline memory and non-memory SCC relate to longitudinal change in brain volume and neuropsychological test performance in 476 functionally-intact, objectively unimpaired older adults (<em>M</em><sub><em>age</em></sub> = 72y, 56 % female, follow-up time = 1 – 9 years). Mixed-effects models revealed that both higher baseline memory and non-memory SCC predicted greater atrophy in total gray matter and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex atrophy over time, while only memory SCC predicted steeper medial temporal lobe atrophy. Regarding neuropsychological performance, higher non-memory SCC predicted decline in processing speed performance, while memory SCC did not predict neuropsychological trajectories. SCC are a risk factor for more adverse brain and cognitive aging trajectories, even in functionally-intact, seemingly cognitively normal older adults.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":19110,"journal":{"name":"Neurobiology of Aging","volume":"143 ","pages":"Pages 1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurobiology of Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0197458024001350","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Subjective cognitive concerns (SCC) are common even in cognitively normal older adults who lack objectively-detectable deficits on standard neuropsychological evaluation. The clinical relevance of these concerns, particularly considering the nature of concerns (e.g., memory versus non-memory), remains unclear. Thus, we examined whether baseline memory and non-memory SCC relate to longitudinal change in brain volume and neuropsychological test performance in 476 functionally-intact, objectively unimpaired older adults (Mage = 72y, 56 % female, follow-up time = 1 – 9 years). Mixed-effects models revealed that both higher baseline memory and non-memory SCC predicted greater atrophy in total gray matter and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex atrophy over time, while only memory SCC predicted steeper medial temporal lobe atrophy. Regarding neuropsychological performance, higher non-memory SCC predicted decline in processing speed performance, while memory SCC did not predict neuropsychological trajectories. SCC are a risk factor for more adverse brain and cognitive aging trajectories, even in functionally-intact, seemingly cognitively normal older adults.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用认知正常老年人的基线主观认知问题预测脑萎缩和认知老化轨迹
主观认知障碍(SCC)即使在认知正常的老年人中也很常见,这些老年人在标准神经心理学评估中没有客观上可检测到的缺陷。这些问题的临床意义,尤其是考虑到问题的性质(如记忆与非记忆),仍不清楚。因此,我们研究了基线记忆和非记忆 SCC 是否与 476 名功能完好、客观上未受损的老年人(年龄 = 72 岁,56% 为女性,随访时间 = 1 - 9 年)的脑容量和神经心理学测试成绩的纵向变化有关。混合效应模型显示,较高的基线记忆和非记忆SCC可预测随着时间的推移,总灰质和背外侧前额叶皮质的萎缩程度加重,而只有记忆SCC可预测内侧颞叶的萎缩程度加重。在神经心理学表现方面,较高的非记忆性 SCC 预测了处理速度表现的下降,而记忆性 SCC 并未预测神经心理学轨迹。即使是功能完好、认知能力看似正常的老年人,SCC 也是导致大脑和认知能力衰老轨迹更加不利的风险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neurobiology of Aging
Neurobiology of Aging 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
2.40%
发文量
225
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Neurobiology of Aging publishes the results of studies in behavior, biochemistry, cell biology, endocrinology, molecular biology, morphology, neurology, neuropathology, pharmacology, physiology and protein chemistry in which the primary emphasis involves mechanisms of nervous system changes with age or diseases associated with age. Reviews and primary research articles are included, occasionally accompanied by open peer commentary. Letters to the Editor and brief communications are also acceptable. Brief reports of highly time-sensitive material are usually treated as rapid communications in which case editorial review is completed within six weeks and publication scheduled for the next available issue.
期刊最新文献
Cerebral white matter hyperintensity volumes: Normative age- and sex-specific values from 15 population-based cohorts comprising 14,876 individuals Contents Editorial Advisory Board Cross-sectional and longitudinal relationships among blood-brain barrier disruption, Alzheimer's disease biomarkers, and cognition in cognitively normal older adults Effects of age and dietary methionine restriction on cognitive and behavioural phenotypes in the rTg4510 mouse model of frontotemporal dementia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1