A hybrid approach to extract conceptual diagram from software requirements

IF 1.5 4区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING Science of Computer Programming Pub Date : 2024-08-23 DOI:10.1016/j.scico.2024.103186
Shweta , Ratna Sanyal , Bibhas Ghoshal
{"title":"A hybrid approach to extract conceptual diagram from software requirements","authors":"Shweta ,&nbsp;Ratna Sanyal ,&nbsp;Bibhas Ghoshal","doi":"10.1016/j.scico.2024.103186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Employing rules for the automatic extraction of conceptual diagrams from software requirements has been in practice for some time. However, considering only rules for extraction makes the system complex to handle. Moreover, the rules are predominantly based on the syntactic structure such as Part of Speech tags along with Dependency Grammar of sentences and rarely on semantics. In this paper, we propose to use a probabilistic approach in configuration with the rule-based technique and the Word embeddings to preserve the semantics of the sentence. Hence, reduces the complexity of the extraction procedure. Further, we advocate the use of a divide-and-conquer policy of extraction instead of extracting classes for one entire use case description. We extract the class diagram from small use cases and then merge it to obtain the class diagram. As generated class diagram corresponding to small use cases can be utilized in another similar software design, thus, it increases the scalability and decreases the extraction time. The proposed hybrid approach integrates the knowledge from the experiences. Thus, the proposed approach achieved 90% as F1-score whereas the F1-Score for the existing methods ranged between 79-88%. The proposed hybrid approach also shows a 19.44% reduction in terms of the number of iterations performed to carry out extraction procedures for individual use cases. Hence, reduces the extraction procedure complexity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49561,"journal":{"name":"Science of Computer Programming","volume":"239 ","pages":"Article 103186"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science of Computer Programming","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167642324001096","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Employing rules for the automatic extraction of conceptual diagrams from software requirements has been in practice for some time. However, considering only rules for extraction makes the system complex to handle. Moreover, the rules are predominantly based on the syntactic structure such as Part of Speech tags along with Dependency Grammar of sentences and rarely on semantics. In this paper, we propose to use a probabilistic approach in configuration with the rule-based technique and the Word embeddings to preserve the semantics of the sentence. Hence, reduces the complexity of the extraction procedure. Further, we advocate the use of a divide-and-conquer policy of extraction instead of extracting classes for one entire use case description. We extract the class diagram from small use cases and then merge it to obtain the class diagram. As generated class diagram corresponding to small use cases can be utilized in another similar software design, thus, it increases the scalability and decreases the extraction time. The proposed hybrid approach integrates the knowledge from the experiences. Thus, the proposed approach achieved 90% as F1-score whereas the F1-Score for the existing methods ranged between 79-88%. The proposed hybrid approach also shows a 19.44% reduction in terms of the number of iterations performed to carry out extraction procedures for individual use cases. Hence, reduces the extraction procedure complexity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从软件需求中提取概念图的混合方法
采用规则从软件需求中自动提取概念图的做法已经有一段时间了。然而,仅考虑规则提取会使系统的处理变得复杂。此外,这些规则主要基于句法结构,如句子的语篇标记和依赖语法,而很少基于语义。在本文中,我们建议在基于规则的技术和词嵌入的配置中使用概率方法,以保留句子的语义。因此,可以降低提取过程的复杂性。此外,我们提倡使用分而治之的提取策略,而不是为整个用例描述提取类。我们从小型用例中提取类图,然后将其合并以获得类图。由于生成的类图与小用例相对应,可用于另一个类似的软件设计,因此提高了可扩展性,减少了提取时间。拟议的混合方法整合了经验知识。因此,拟议方法的 F1 分数达到了 90%,而现有方法的 F1 分数在 79-88% 之间。所提出的混合方法还减少了 19.44%的迭代次数,从而减少了对单个用例的提取程序。因此,降低了提取程序的复杂性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Science of Computer Programming
Science of Computer Programming 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
76
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Science of Computer Programming is dedicated to the distribution of research results in the areas of software systems development, use and maintenance, including the software aspects of hardware design. The journal has a wide scope ranging from the many facets of methodological foundations to the details of technical issues andthe aspects of industrial practice. The subjects of interest to SCP cover the entire spectrum of methods for the entire life cycle of software systems, including • Requirements, specification, design, validation, verification, coding, testing, maintenance, metrics and renovation of software; • Design, implementation and evaluation of programming languages; • Programming environments, development tools, visualisation and animation; • Management of the development process; • Human factors in software, software for social interaction, software for social computing; • Cyber physical systems, and software for the interaction between the physical and the machine; • Software aspects of infrastructure services, system administration, and network management.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Analysis and formal specification of OpenJDK's BitSet: Proof files Parametric ontologies in formal software engineering CAN-Verify: Automated analysis for BDI agents Efficient interaction-based offline runtime verification of distributed systems with lifeline removal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1