Developing reciprocity between one-year-old children with visual impairment and additional disabilities and their mothers: The effects of bodily-tactile early intervention

IF 2 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Learning Culture and Social Interaction Pub Date : 2024-08-28 DOI:10.1016/j.lcsi.2024.100849
Sini Peltokorpi , Saara Salo , Paul Hart , Anne Nafstad , Anu Kajamies , Minna Laakso
{"title":"Developing reciprocity between one-year-old children with visual impairment and additional disabilities and their mothers: The effects of bodily-tactile early intervention","authors":"Sini Peltokorpi ,&nbsp;Saara Salo ,&nbsp;Paul Hart ,&nbsp;Anne Nafstad ,&nbsp;Anu Kajamies ,&nbsp;Minna Laakso","doi":"10.1016/j.lcsi.2024.100849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Reciprocal interactions between parents and their children with visual impairment (VI) and additional disabilities (AD) may be compromised due to the children's disabilities. Children with VIAD may not be able to access their parents' nonverbal expressions, such as gazes or facial gestures. Moreover, the children's expressions can be difficult for their parents to read. The bodily-tactile modality can be used in interactions to compensate for a child's lack of vision. This multiple-case study investigated the effects of a bodily-tactile early intervention on interactional reciprocity in three sighted mothers and their one-year-old children with VIAD. The data consisted of eight hours of video recordings from four baseline, eight intervention, and three follow-up sessions. Baseline and intervention recordings were made weekly. The follow-up recordings were made one week, five weeks, and nine weeks after the last intervention session. The video data were analyzed using the principles of multimodal conversation analysis. The sequential analysis showed that interactive reciprocity between the mothers and their children increased during the intervention. The mothers began to use more of the bodily-tactile modality in early social play routines. Moreover, they started to treat their children's movements as meaningful turns in interaction and to give more time and space for their children to take their turns. The results suggest that the bodily actions of children with VIAD can become resources for their participation through their mothers' actions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46850,"journal":{"name":"Learning Culture and Social Interaction","volume":"48 ","pages":"Article 100849"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210656124000576/pdfft?md5=5309cb014f1aff8c4f5553c1c5b5144e&pid=1-s2.0-S2210656124000576-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning Culture and Social Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210656124000576","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reciprocal interactions between parents and their children with visual impairment (VI) and additional disabilities (AD) may be compromised due to the children's disabilities. Children with VIAD may not be able to access their parents' nonverbal expressions, such as gazes or facial gestures. Moreover, the children's expressions can be difficult for their parents to read. The bodily-tactile modality can be used in interactions to compensate for a child's lack of vision. This multiple-case study investigated the effects of a bodily-tactile early intervention on interactional reciprocity in three sighted mothers and their one-year-old children with VIAD. The data consisted of eight hours of video recordings from four baseline, eight intervention, and three follow-up sessions. Baseline and intervention recordings were made weekly. The follow-up recordings were made one week, five weeks, and nine weeks after the last intervention session. The video data were analyzed using the principles of multimodal conversation analysis. The sequential analysis showed that interactive reciprocity between the mothers and their children increased during the intervention. The mothers began to use more of the bodily-tactile modality in early social play routines. Moreover, they started to treat their children's movements as meaningful turns in interaction and to give more time and space for their children to take their turns. The results suggest that the bodily actions of children with VIAD can become resources for their participation through their mothers' actions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
发展一岁视力障碍和附加残疾儿童与母亲之间的互惠关系:身体触觉早期干预的效果
父母与视力障碍(VI)和附加残疾(AD)儿童之间的相互交流可能会因为儿童的残疾而受到影响。视障和附加残疾儿童可能无法获得父母的非语言表达,如凝视或面部手势。此外,父母也很难看懂儿童的表情。身体触觉模式可用于互动,以弥补儿童视力的不足。这项多案例研究调查了身体触觉早期干预对三位视力正常的母亲和她们一岁大的 VIAD 儿童互动互惠的影响。数据包括四次基线、八次干预和三次随访的八小时视频记录。基线录像和干预录像每周进行一次。跟踪录像分别在最后一次干预后一周、五周和九周进行。我们采用多模态会话分析的原则对视频数据进行了分析。顺序分析表明,在干预过程中,母亲与孩子之间的互动互惠增加了。在早期的社交游戏中,母亲们开始更多地使用身体触觉模式。此外,她们开始在互动中把孩子的动作视为有意义的轮流,并给予孩子更多的时间和空间来轮流。研究结果表明,患有 VIAD 的儿童的身体动作可以通过母亲的行为成为他们参与的资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Learning Culture and Social Interaction
Learning Culture and Social Interaction EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
10.50%
发文量
50
期刊最新文献
A dynamic systems examination of the impact of peers on educator–infant synchrony within joint attention interactions in an early childhood room Authority and positionings in elementary mathematics: An interactional ethnographic approach Peer interactions in 4/6-month-old infants: From motor development to multimodal communication Egalitarian dialogue and student participation in Learning Communities. The case of the Coquimbo Region, Chile Negotiating agency in teacher-children triads of collaborative (re)storytelling: Empirical study and methodological implications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1