On the application of RHT model and SPG algorithm for the analysis of rock cutting process

IF 3.5 2区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI:10.1016/j.simpat.2024.103012
Ebrahim Farrokh , Hamid Rokhy , Davood Lotfi
{"title":"On the application of RHT model and SPG algorithm for the analysis of rock cutting process","authors":"Ebrahim Farrokh ,&nbsp;Hamid Rokhy ,&nbsp;Davood Lotfi","doi":"10.1016/j.simpat.2024.103012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The linear cutting process in rock poses challenges for verification in field experiments, laboratory investigations, or numerical simulations. This study aims to analyze the rock cutting process and disc cutter force estimation when using linear cutting mode. Three-dimensional numerical simulations using the explicit dynamic finite element method (LS-DYNA software) are conducted to characterize the cutting process. In this regard, two computational algorithms (Lagrangian and Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH)) and two material models (Johnson-Holmquist Concrete (JHC) and Riedel-Hiermaier-Thoma (RHT)) are compared, with SPH and RHT identified as more suitable for rock cutting simulation. The results of comparative analyses show that the Lagrangian computational algorithm is highly dependent on the erosion value, hence this method is not suitable for the simulation of the rock-cutting process. Comparing to the RHT material constitutive model, the Johnson-Holmquist model does not well model the post-failure softening strain behavior, which leads to a reduction in the width of the failure area. The comparative analyses also show that the normal and rolling forces predicted by the JHC model are well over 30% higher than the actual experimental results, while the RHT model shows a good agreement between the predictions and the actual results. Overall, the RHT material model with the use of the SPH computational algorithm shows a very good combination in rock cutting process simulation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49518,"journal":{"name":"Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory","volume":"136 ","pages":"Article 103012"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569190X24001266","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The linear cutting process in rock poses challenges for verification in field experiments, laboratory investigations, or numerical simulations. This study aims to analyze the rock cutting process and disc cutter force estimation when using linear cutting mode. Three-dimensional numerical simulations using the explicit dynamic finite element method (LS-DYNA software) are conducted to characterize the cutting process. In this regard, two computational algorithms (Lagrangian and Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics (SPH)) and two material models (Johnson-Holmquist Concrete (JHC) and Riedel-Hiermaier-Thoma (RHT)) are compared, with SPH and RHT identified as more suitable for rock cutting simulation. The results of comparative analyses show that the Lagrangian computational algorithm is highly dependent on the erosion value, hence this method is not suitable for the simulation of the rock-cutting process. Comparing to the RHT material constitutive model, the Johnson-Holmquist model does not well model the post-failure softening strain behavior, which leads to a reduction in the width of the failure area. The comparative analyses also show that the normal and rolling forces predicted by the JHC model are well over 30% higher than the actual experimental results, while the RHT model shows a good agreement between the predictions and the actual results. Overall, the RHT material model with the use of the SPH computational algorithm shows a very good combination in rock cutting process simulation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
论 RHT 模型和 SPG 算法在岩石切割过程分析中的应用
岩石中的线性切割过程给现场实验、实验室研究或数值模拟验证带来了挑战。本研究旨在分析使用线性切割模式时的岩石切割过程和圆盘铣刀力估算。使用显式动态有限元法(LS-DYNA 软件)进行三维数值模拟,以确定切割过程的特征。在这方面,比较了两种计算算法(拉格朗日和平滑粒子流体力学(SPH))和两种材料模型(约翰逊-霍尔姆奎斯特混凝土(JHC)和里德尔-希尔迈尔-托马(RHT)),认为 SPH 和 RHT 更适合岩石切割模拟。比较分析的结果表明,拉格朗日计算算法对侵蚀值的依赖性很大,因此这种方法不适合模拟岩石切割过程。与 RHT 材料构成模型相比,Johnson-Holmquist 模型不能很好地模拟破坏后的软化应变行为,从而导致破坏区域的宽度减小。对比分析还显示,JHC 模型预测的法向力和滚动力比实际实验结果高出 30% 以上,而 RHT 模型的预测结果与实际结果之间具有良好的一致性。总之,RHT 材料模型与 SPH 计算算法的结合在岩石切割过程模拟中显示出了很好的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory
Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory 工程技术-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
142
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: The journal Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory provides a forum for original, high-quality papers dealing with any aspect of systems simulation and modelling. The journal aims at being a reference and a powerful tool to all those professionally active and/or interested in the methods and applications of simulation. Submitted papers will be peer reviewed and must significantly contribute to modelling and simulation in general or use modelling and simulation in application areas. Paper submission is solicited on: • theoretical aspects of modelling and simulation including formal modelling, model-checking, random number generators, sensitivity analysis, variance reduction techniques, experimental design, meta-modelling, methods and algorithms for validation and verification, selection and comparison procedures etc.; • methodology and application of modelling and simulation in any area, including computer systems, networks, real-time and embedded systems, mobile and intelligent agents, manufacturing and transportation systems, management, engineering, biomedical engineering, economics, ecology and environment, education, transaction handling, etc.; • simulation languages and environments including those, specific to distributed computing, grid computing, high performance computers or computer networks, etc.; • distributed and real-time simulation, simulation interoperability; • tools for high performance computing simulation, including dedicated architectures and parallel computing.
期刊最新文献
Incentive-driven computation offloading and resource pricing strategy in vehicular edge computing assisted with idle mobile vehicles Simulation modeling of super-large ships traffic: Insights from Ningbo-Zhoushan Port for coastal port management An algorithm for processing block diagram models of dynamical systems and an open-source visual-programming simulation tool Survey of CPU and memory simulators in computer architecture: A comprehensive analysis including compiler integration and emerging technology applications VM consolidation steps in cloud computing: A perspective review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1