Short-Line Fault Interruption Performance Comparison of SF$_{6}$ Alternatives

IF 3.8 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery Pub Date : 2024-08-28 DOI:10.1109/TPWRD.2024.3451178
Paweł Pietrzak;Joseph T. Engelbrecht;Deepshikha Kumari;Christian M. Franck
{"title":"Short-Line Fault Interruption Performance Comparison of SF$_{6}$ Alternatives","authors":"Paweł Pietrzak;Joseph T. Engelbrecht;Deepshikha Kumari;Christian M. Franck","doi":"10.1109/TPWRD.2024.3451178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Measurements of the interruption performance of SF\n<inline-formula><tex-math>$_{6}$</tex-math></inline-formula>\n and its alternatives including air, CO\n<inline-formula><tex-math>$_{2}$</tex-math></inline-formula>\n, and its mixtures with O\n<inline-formula><tex-math>$_{2}$</tex-math></inline-formula>\n, C\n<inline-formula><tex-math>$_{4}$</tex-math></inline-formula>\nF\n<inline-formula><tex-math>$_{7}$</tex-math></inline-formula>\nN, and C\n<inline-formula><tex-math>$_{5}$</tex-math></inline-formula>\nF\n<inline-formula><tex-math>$_{10}$</tex-math></inline-formula>\nO were performed under short-line fault like conditions. The measurements were conducted with an experimental puffer-type circuit breaker in which the same upstream pressure and the same contact separation at the current zero instant were ensured for every gas. At \n<inline-formula><tex-math>$\\Delta p = \\text{5.8 bar}$</tex-math></inline-formula>\n, the interruption limit of SF\n<inline-formula><tex-math>$_{6}$</tex-math></inline-formula>\n was found to be \n<inline-formula><tex-math>$\\text{12.39 A}/ \\mu \\text{s}$</tex-math></inline-formula>\n. In the CO\n<inline-formula><tex-math>$_{2}$</tex-math></inline-formula>\n-based alternatives at the same pressure, the thermal interruption limit was found to range from \n<inline-formula><tex-math>$\\text{9.01 A}/ \\mu \\text{s}\\,\\text{to}\\, \\text{9.46 A}/ \\mu \\text{s}$</tex-math></inline-formula>\n, while in air an interruption limit of \n<inline-formula><tex-math>$\\text{4.17 A}/ \\mu \\text{s}$</tex-math></inline-formula>\n was identified. Despite the similar thermal performance among CO\n<inline-formula><tex-math>$_{2}$</tex-math></inline-formula>\n based mixtures, it was found that in those mixtures without fluorinated additives, the overall interruption limit is lowered by the occurrence of hot dielectric failures. Limit values of the arc conductance decay, G200 and G500, were found to be \n<inline-formula><tex-math>$\\text{1.44 mS}$</tex-math></inline-formula>\n and \n<inline-formula><tex-math>$\\text{3.83 mS}$</tex-math></inline-formula>\n respectively in SF\n<inline-formula><tex-math>$_{6}$</tex-math></inline-formula>\n, while in the alternatives these limit values ranged from two to six times lower. Arc voltage extinction peak was also evaluated, with SF\n<inline-formula><tex-math>$_{6}$</tex-math></inline-formula>\n found to have the lowest limit value at \n<inline-formula><tex-math>$\\text{628 V}$</tex-math></inline-formula>\n, and air found to have the highest at \n<inline-formula><tex-math>$\\text{1535 V}$</tex-math></inline-formula>\n. Post-arc current was also measured, and found to not exceed \n<inline-formula><tex-math>$\\text{350 mA}$</tex-math></inline-formula>\n in any gas, with a duration limited to \n<inline-formula><tex-math>$\\text{9}\\; \\mu \\text{s}$</tex-math></inline-formula>\n or less. Gas analysis of two fluorinated CO\n<inline-formula><tex-math>$_{2}$</tex-math></inline-formula>\n mixtures (CO\n<inline-formula><tex-math>$_{2}$</tex-math></inline-formula>\n/C\n<inline-formula><tex-math>$_{4}$</tex-math></inline-formula>\nF\n<inline-formula><tex-math>$_{7}$</tex-math></inline-formula>\nN and CO\n<inline-formula><tex-math>$_{2}$</tex-math></inline-formula>\n/O\n<inline-formula><tex-math>$_{2}$</tex-math></inline-formula>\n/C\n<inline-formula><tex-math>$_{4}$</tex-math></inline-formula>\nF\n<inline-formula><tex-math>$_{7}$</tex-math></inline-formula>\nN) showed no significant influence of oxygen on the creation of byproducts.","PeriodicalId":13498,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery","volume":"39 6","pages":"3071-3081"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10654492/","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Measurements of the interruption performance of SF $_{6}$ and its alternatives including air, CO $_{2}$ , and its mixtures with O $_{2}$ , C $_{4}$ F $_{7}$ N, and C $_{5}$ F $_{10}$ O were performed under short-line fault like conditions. The measurements were conducted with an experimental puffer-type circuit breaker in which the same upstream pressure and the same contact separation at the current zero instant were ensured for every gas. At $\Delta p = \text{5.8 bar}$ , the interruption limit of SF $_{6}$ was found to be $\text{12.39 A}/ \mu \text{s}$ . In the CO $_{2}$ -based alternatives at the same pressure, the thermal interruption limit was found to range from $\text{9.01 A}/ \mu \text{s}\,\text{to}\, \text{9.46 A}/ \mu \text{s}$ , while in air an interruption limit of $\text{4.17 A}/ \mu \text{s}$ was identified. Despite the similar thermal performance among CO $_{2}$ based mixtures, it was found that in those mixtures without fluorinated additives, the overall interruption limit is lowered by the occurrence of hot dielectric failures. Limit values of the arc conductance decay, G200 and G500, were found to be $\text{1.44 mS}$ and $\text{3.83 mS}$ respectively in SF $_{6}$ , while in the alternatives these limit values ranged from two to six times lower. Arc voltage extinction peak was also evaluated, with SF $_{6}$ found to have the lowest limit value at $\text{628 V}$ , and air found to have the highest at $\text{1535 V}$ . Post-arc current was also measured, and found to not exceed $\text{350 mA}$ in any gas, with a duration limited to $\text{9}\; \mu \text{s}$ or less. Gas analysis of two fluorinated CO $_{2}$ mixtures (CO $_{2}$ /C $_{4}$ F $_{7}$ N and CO $_{2}$ /O $_{2}$ /C $_{4}$ F $_{7}$ N) showed no significant influence of oxygen on the creation of byproducts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SF6 替代品的短线路故障中断性能比较
在类似短线故障的条件下,对 SF$_{6}$ 及其替代品(包括空气、CO$_{2}$ 及其与 O$_{2}$、C$_{4}$F$_{7}$N 和 C$_{5}$F$_{10}$O 的混合物)的中断性能进行了测量。测量使用的是实验性膨化器式断路器,在该断路器中,每种气体的上游压力和电流零点瞬间的触头分离度都是相同的。在 $\Delta p = \text{5.8 bar}$ 时,发现 SF$_{6}$ 的中断极限为 $\text{12.39 A}/ \mu \text{s}$。在相同压力下,基于 CO$_{2}$ 的替代品的热中断极限为 $\text{9.01 A}/ \mu \text{s}\text{to}\text{9.46 A}/ \mu \text{s}$,而在空气中的中断极限为 $\text{4.17 A}/ \mu \text{s}$。尽管基于 CO$_{2}$ 的混合物具有相似的热性能,但研究发现,在不含氟添加剂的混合物中,由于热介质失效的发生,整体中断极限会降低。在 SF$_{6}$ 中,电弧电导衰减的极限值 G200 和 G500 分别为 $\text{1.44 mS}$ 和 $\text{3.83 mS}$,而在替代品中,这些极限值低 2 到 6 倍不等。还评估了电弧电压消散峰值,发现 SF$_{6}$ 的最低限值为 $\text{628V}$,而空气的最高限值为 $\text{1535V}$。还测量了弧后电流,发现任何气体中的弧后电流都不会超过 $\text{350 mA}$,持续时间限制在 $\text{9}\; \mu \text{s}$ 或更短。对两种含氟 CO$_{2}$ 混合物(CO$_{2}$/C$_{4}$F$_{7}$N 和 CO$_{2}$/O$_{2}$/C$_{4}$F$_{7}$N)进行的气体分析表明,氧气对副产品的产生没有显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery
IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
9.00
自引率
13.60%
发文量
513
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The scope of the Society embraces planning, research, development, design, application, construction, installation and operation of apparatus, equipment, structures, materials and systems for the safe, reliable and economic generation, transmission, distribution, conversion, measurement and control of electric energy. It includes the developing of engineering standards, the providing of information and instruction to the public and to legislators, as well as technical scientific, literary, educational and other activities that contribute to the electric power discipline or utilize the techniques or products within this discipline.
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents Blank Page IEEE Power & Energy Society Information IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery Information for Authors A Graphical Tool to Examine the Coordination Details of Directional Overcurrent Protections as a Function of Fault Location
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1