Retrospective, propensity score--matched study examining the relationship between frailty and Clostridioides difficile infection in a national cohort of US veterans

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES American journal of infection control Pub Date : 2024-08-26 DOI:10.1016/j.ajic.2024.08.020
Kelly R. Reveles PharmD, PhD , Kelsey A. Strey PharmD , Esther L. Albuquerque , Damaris Jacota , Xavier Jones BS , Joseph J. Carreno PharmD, MPH
{"title":"Retrospective, propensity score--matched study examining the relationship between frailty and Clostridioides difficile infection in a national cohort of US veterans","authors":"Kelly R. Reveles PharmD, PhD ,&nbsp;Kelsey A. Strey PharmD ,&nbsp;Esther L. Albuquerque ,&nbsp;Damaris Jacota ,&nbsp;Xavier Jones BS ,&nbsp;Joseph J. Carreno PharmD, MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.ajic.2024.08.020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Frailty is often more predictive of disease and mortality compared with chronological age. This study determined the impact of frailty on <em>Clostridioides difficile</em> infection (CDI) risk and outcomes in a national veteran population.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a retrospective cohort study of CDI and control veteran inpatients and outpatients from fiscal year 2003 to 2018. Baseline frailty was presented as the Veterans Affairs (VA) Frailty Index. Propensity score--matched analyses were conducted to compare CDI risk, CDI health outcomes, and 1-year new-onset frailty-associated conditions.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 11,451 CDI and 11,451 matched control patients were included. Baseline frailty conditions were more common among CDI patients, especially involuntary weight loss (6.0% vs 3.4%, <em>P</em> &lt; .001) and anemia (24.6% vs 18.7%, <em>P</em> &lt; .001). VA Frailty Index was significantly higher for CDI patients (0.13 vs 0.11, <em>P</em> = .019). Frail CDI patients were more likely to experience 30-day mortality (11.3% vs 1.1%, <em>P</em> &lt; .001) and 60-day CDI recurrence (20.4% vs 16.3%, <em>P</em> &lt; .001) compared with non-/prefrail CDI patients. At 1<!--> <!-->year, CDI patients were significantly more likely to be categorized as frail (19.6% vs 17.0%, <em>P</em> &lt; .001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>This study demonstrated the potential association between frailty and CDI risk and health outcomes, as well as new-onset frailty diagnoses in patients who develop CDI.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7621,"journal":{"name":"American journal of infection control","volume":"52 12","pages":"Pages 1412-1418"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of infection control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0196655324006874","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Frailty is often more predictive of disease and mortality compared with chronological age. This study determined the impact of frailty on Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) risk and outcomes in a national veteran population.

Methods

This was a retrospective cohort study of CDI and control veteran inpatients and outpatients from fiscal year 2003 to 2018. Baseline frailty was presented as the Veterans Affairs (VA) Frailty Index. Propensity score--matched analyses were conducted to compare CDI risk, CDI health outcomes, and 1-year new-onset frailty-associated conditions.

Results

A total of 11,451 CDI and 11,451 matched control patients were included. Baseline frailty conditions were more common among CDI patients, especially involuntary weight loss (6.0% vs 3.4%, P < .001) and anemia (24.6% vs 18.7%, P < .001). VA Frailty Index was significantly higher for CDI patients (0.13 vs 0.11, P = .019). Frail CDI patients were more likely to experience 30-day mortality (11.3% vs 1.1%, P < .001) and 60-day CDI recurrence (20.4% vs 16.3%, P < .001) compared with non-/prefrail CDI patients. At 1 year, CDI patients were significantly more likely to be categorized as frail (19.6% vs 17.0%, P < .001).

Conclusions

This study demonstrated the potential association between frailty and CDI risk and health outcomes, as well as new-onset frailty diagnoses in patients who develop CDI.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在美国退伍军人全国队列中开展倾向得分匹配回顾性研究,探讨虚弱与艰难梭菌感染之间的关系。
背景:与实际年龄相比,虚弱通常更能预测疾病和死亡率。本研究确定了全国退伍军人群体中体弱对 CDI 风险和结果的影响:这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象为 2003-2018 财年的 CDI 和对照组退伍军人住院和门诊患者。基线虚弱度以退伍军人虚弱指数(VA-FI)表示。研究人员进行了一系列倾向得分匹配分析,以比较 CDI 风险、CDI 健康结果和一年内新发的虚弱相关病症:结果:共纳入了 11,451 名 CDI 患者和 11,451 名匹配对照组患者。基线虚弱状况在 CDI 患者中更为常见,尤其是非自愿性体重减轻(6.0% 对 3.4%,p):这项研究证明了基线虚弱与 CDI 风险和健康结果之间的潜在联系,以及 CDI 患者中新出现的虚弱诊断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
4.10%
发文量
479
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: AJIC covers key topics and issues in infection control and epidemiology. Infection control professionals, including physicians, nurses, and epidemiologists, rely on AJIC for peer-reviewed articles covering clinical topics as well as original research. As the official publication of the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC)
期刊最新文献
Indicator-based tuberculosis infection control assessments with knowledge, attitudes, and practices evaluations among health facilities in China, 2017-2019. Evaluation of a far ultraviolet-C device for decontamination of portable equipment in clinical areas. Predictors for non-compliant intra-vascular catheter insertion site dressings at a large academic center. Bacterial air contamination and the protective effect of coverage for sterile surgical goods: A randomized controlled trial. Survey said! LTC-CIP® Certificant's Perspective with Passing the Certification Exam.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1