Effects of multiple protection model in the operating room on physiological stress and risk events in patients undergoing coronary artery stent implantation.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL BioMedical Engineering OnLine Pub Date : 2024-08-28 DOI:10.1186/s12938-024-01283-3
Qiaoli Wang, Jinfu Zhu
{"title":"Effects of multiple protection model in the operating room on physiological stress and risk events in patients undergoing coronary artery stent implantation.","authors":"Qiaoli Wang, Jinfu Zhu","doi":"10.1186/s12938-024-01283-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To analyze the impact of multiple protection model in the operating room on patients' physiological stress and risk events after coronary artery stent implantation (CASI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>During October 2021 to October 2022, 150 patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) were picked as the research subjects, all of whom underwent CASI. The clinical data were retrospectively analyzed, and the patients were divided into two groups according to different nursing methods, with 75 cases in each group. Patients in the intervention group received multiple protection model intervention in the operating room, and the patients in the control group adopted conventional care model. The patient satisfaction with nursing, postoperative recovery, psychological stress scores, physiological stress indicators, and adverse cardiac risk events were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients in the intervention group had much higher percentage of the patient satisfaction with nursing than those in the control group (P < 0.05). The time to get out of bed and hospital stay was significantly shorter and the 6-min walking distance was markedly longer in the intervention group than the control (P < 0.05). The Hamilton Anxiety (HAMA) scale and Hamilton Depression (HAMD) scale score of patients in two groups were sharply decreased after the intervention (P < 0.05), which were strongly lower in the intervention group than the control (P < 0.001). After the intervention, the heart rate, cortisol and epinephrine of patients were all sensibly elevated in two groups (P < 0.05), which were all memorably lower in the intervention group than the control (P < 0.001). The incidence of adverse cardiac risk events in the intervention group was 5.33%, which was dramatically lower than 16.00% in the control group (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The application of multiple protection model in the operating room on patients undergoing coronary stent implantation promoted postoperative recovery, reduced patients' psychological and physiological stress, maintained blood pressure and other vital signs, reduced the incidence of adverse cardiac risk events, and improved the patient satisfaction with nursing.</p>","PeriodicalId":8927,"journal":{"name":"BioMedical Engineering OnLine","volume":"23 1","pages":"86"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11351351/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BioMedical Engineering OnLine","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12938-024-01283-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the impact of multiple protection model in the operating room on patients' physiological stress and risk events after coronary artery stent implantation (CASI).

Methods: During October 2021 to October 2022, 150 patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) were picked as the research subjects, all of whom underwent CASI. The clinical data were retrospectively analyzed, and the patients were divided into two groups according to different nursing methods, with 75 cases in each group. Patients in the intervention group received multiple protection model intervention in the operating room, and the patients in the control group adopted conventional care model. The patient satisfaction with nursing, postoperative recovery, psychological stress scores, physiological stress indicators, and adverse cardiac risk events were recorded.

Results: Patients in the intervention group had much higher percentage of the patient satisfaction with nursing than those in the control group (P < 0.05). The time to get out of bed and hospital stay was significantly shorter and the 6-min walking distance was markedly longer in the intervention group than the control (P < 0.05). The Hamilton Anxiety (HAMA) scale and Hamilton Depression (HAMD) scale score of patients in two groups were sharply decreased after the intervention (P < 0.05), which were strongly lower in the intervention group than the control (P < 0.001). After the intervention, the heart rate, cortisol and epinephrine of patients were all sensibly elevated in two groups (P < 0.05), which were all memorably lower in the intervention group than the control (P < 0.001). The incidence of adverse cardiac risk events in the intervention group was 5.33%, which was dramatically lower than 16.00% in the control group (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: The application of multiple protection model in the operating room on patients undergoing coronary stent implantation promoted postoperative recovery, reduced patients' psychological and physiological stress, maintained blood pressure and other vital signs, reduced the incidence of adverse cardiac risk events, and improved the patient satisfaction with nursing.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
手术室多重保护模式对冠状动脉支架植入术患者生理压力和风险事件的影响。
目的分析手术室多重保护模式对冠状动脉支架植入术(CASI)后患者生理应激和风险事件的影响:方法:选取 2021 年 10 月至 2022 年 10 月期间 150 例冠心病患者作为研究对象,所有患者均接受了 CASI 手术。回顾性分析临床资料,根据不同的护理方法将患者分为两组,每组75例。干预组患者在手术室接受多重保护模式干预,对照组患者采用常规护理模式。记录患者的护理满意度、术后恢复情况、心理应激评分、生理应激指标、不良心脏风险事件等:结果:干预组患者对护理工作的满意度远高于对照组(P在手术室对冠状动脉支架植入术患者应用多重保护模式,促进了患者的术后恢复,减轻了患者的心理和生理压力,维持了患者的血压和其他生命体征,降低了不良心脏风险事件的发生率,提高了患者对护理工作的满意度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BioMedical Engineering OnLine
BioMedical Engineering OnLine 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
2.60%
发文量
79
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BioMedical Engineering OnLine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that is dedicated to publishing research in all areas of biomedical engineering. BioMedical Engineering OnLine is aimed at readers and authors throughout the world, with an interest in using tools of the physical and data sciences and techniques in engineering to understand and solve problems in the biological and medical sciences. Topical areas include, but are not limited to: Bioinformatics- Bioinstrumentation- Biomechanics- Biomedical Devices & Instrumentation- Biomedical Signal Processing- Healthcare Information Systems- Human Dynamics- Neural Engineering- Rehabilitation Engineering- Biomaterials- Biomedical Imaging & Image Processing- BioMEMS and On-Chip Devices- Bio-Micro/Nano Technologies- Biomolecular Engineering- Biosensors- Cardiovascular Systems Engineering- Cellular Engineering- Clinical Engineering- Computational Biology- Drug Delivery Technologies- Modeling Methodologies- Nanomaterials and Nanotechnology in Biomedicine- Respiratory Systems Engineering- Robotics in Medicine- Systems and Synthetic Biology- Systems Biology- Telemedicine/Smartphone Applications in Medicine- Therapeutic Systems, Devices and Technologies- Tissue Engineering
期刊最新文献
Application effect of enhanced recovery after surgery on patients with hepatolithiasis undergoing hepatectomy. Expression of periostin in the epithelium of cholesteatoma with different degrees of ossicular chain destruction and its clinical value in predicting postoperative hearing recovery. Transcatheter bicuspid venous valve prostheses: fluid mechanical performance testing of artificial nonwoven leaflets. Albumin nanoparticles are a promising drug delivery system in dentistry. Optimizing stent retrievers for mechanical enhancement and in vitro testing in acute ischemic stroke models.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1