Negotiating grey areas: an interview-based analysis of paramedic uncertainty and decision-making in cardiac arrest events.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE BMC Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2024-08-29 DOI:10.1186/s12873-024-01057-z
Galina Gardiner, Karin Eli, Caroline J Huxley, Rachael Fothergill, Gavin D Perkins, Michael A Smyth, Frances Griffiths, Anne-Marie Slowther
{"title":"Negotiating grey areas: an interview-based analysis of paramedic uncertainty and decision-making in cardiac arrest events.","authors":"Galina Gardiner, Karin Eli, Caroline J Huxley, Rachael Fothergill, Gavin D Perkins, Michael A Smyth, Frances Griffiths, Anne-Marie Slowther","doi":"10.1186/s12873-024-01057-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Paramedics are responsible for critical resuscitation decisions when attending Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrests (OHCA). Existing research indicates that a range of clinical and non-clinical factors moderate their decision-making. Within the United Kingdom (UK), there is little evidence on how and why paramedics make their decisions at actual OHCA events.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We explored the experiences of UK paramedics using individually recalled OHCA events as catalysts for discussion. Pen portraits developed from semi-structured interviews with 31 paramedics across two UK ambulance services were thematically analysed, enabling cross-participant comparisons whilst retaining depth and context.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified four themes: uncertainties encountered in resuscitation guidelines, influences on decision-making, holistic perspectives, and indirect moderators. We found that paramedics experienced uncertainty at all stages of the resuscitation process. Uncertainties arose from indeterminate, ambiguous or complex information and were described as having both clinical and ethical dimensions. Whilst guidelines drove paramedics' decisions, non-clinical personal, practical and relational factors moderated their assessments of survivability and decision-making, with attitudes to interactions between patient age, frailty and quality of life playing a substantial role. Coping strategies such as uncertainty reduction, assumption-based reasoning and weighing pros and cons were evident from interviews.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The complexity of interactions between clinical and non-clinical factors points to an element of variability in paramedics' responses to uncertainty. Exploring UK paramedics' uncertainties and decision-making during specific OHCA events can help acknowledge and address uncertainties in resuscitation guidelines and paramedic training, providing paramedics with the tools to manage uncertainty in a consistent and transparent way.</p>","PeriodicalId":9002,"journal":{"name":"BMC Emergency Medicine","volume":"24 1","pages":"154"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11360680/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-024-01057-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Paramedics are responsible for critical resuscitation decisions when attending Out of Hospital Cardiac Arrests (OHCA). Existing research indicates that a range of clinical and non-clinical factors moderate their decision-making. Within the United Kingdom (UK), there is little evidence on how and why paramedics make their decisions at actual OHCA events.

Methods: We explored the experiences of UK paramedics using individually recalled OHCA events as catalysts for discussion. Pen portraits developed from semi-structured interviews with 31 paramedics across two UK ambulance services were thematically analysed, enabling cross-participant comparisons whilst retaining depth and context.

Results: We identified four themes: uncertainties encountered in resuscitation guidelines, influences on decision-making, holistic perspectives, and indirect moderators. We found that paramedics experienced uncertainty at all stages of the resuscitation process. Uncertainties arose from indeterminate, ambiguous or complex information and were described as having both clinical and ethical dimensions. Whilst guidelines drove paramedics' decisions, non-clinical personal, practical and relational factors moderated their assessments of survivability and decision-making, with attitudes to interactions between patient age, frailty and quality of life playing a substantial role. Coping strategies such as uncertainty reduction, assumption-based reasoning and weighing pros and cons were evident from interviews.

Conclusions: The complexity of interactions between clinical and non-clinical factors points to an element of variability in paramedics' responses to uncertainty. Exploring UK paramedics' uncertainties and decision-making during specific OHCA events can help acknowledge and address uncertainties in resuscitation guidelines and paramedic training, providing paramedics with the tools to manage uncertainty in a consistent and transparent way.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
灰色地带的谈判:基于访谈的辅助医务人员在心脏骤停事件中的不确定性和决策分析。
背景:辅助医务人员在处理院外心脏骤停(OHCA)时负责做出关键的复苏决定。现有研究表明,一系列临床和非临床因素会影响他们的决策。在英国,有关护理人员在实际 OHCA 事件中如何以及为何做出决策的证据却很少:方法:我们利用个人回忆的 OHCA 事件作为讨论的催化剂,探讨了英国辅助医务人员的经验。我们对英国两家救护服务机构的 31 名辅助医务人员进行了半结构式访谈,并对访谈中形成的笔迹进行了主题分析,以便在保留深度和背景的同时进行跨参与者比较:我们确定了四个主题:复苏指南中遇到的不确定性、对决策的影响、整体观点和间接调节因素。我们发现,辅助医务人员在复苏过程的各个阶段都遇到了不确定性。不确定性源于不确定、模糊或复杂的信息,并被描述为具有临床和伦理两个层面。虽然指导方针推动了医护人员的决策,但非临床的个人、实际和关系因素对他们的生存能力评估和决策起到了调节作用,其中对患者年龄、虚弱程度和生活质量之间相互作用的态度起到了重要作用。从访谈中可以明显看出一些应对策略,如减少不确定性、基于假设的推理和权衡利弊等:结论:临床和非临床因素之间相互作用的复杂性表明,辅助医务人员对不确定性的反应存在变数。对英国辅助医务人员在特定 OHCA 事件中的不确定性和决策进行探讨,有助于认识和解决复苏指南和辅助医务人员培训中的不确定性,为辅助医务人员提供以一致和透明的方式管理不确定性的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Emergency Medicine
BMC Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
8.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Emergency Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all urgent and emergency aspects of medicine, in both practice and basic research. In addition, the journal covers aspects of disaster medicine and medicine in special locations, such as conflict areas and military medicine, together with articles concerning healthcare services in the emergency departments.
期刊最新文献
Challenges of providing of special care services in hospitals during emergencies and disasters: a scoping review. Characteristics and survival of hospitalized combat casualties during two major conflicts between Israel and Hamas: 2023 versus 2014. Association between glottis screen location and intubation difficulty: a retrospective video laryngoscopy study. Available equipment for traumatic haemorrhage management in Austrian prehospital physician response units: a nationwide survey and analysis of guideline adherence. Comparison of the effects of group and individual reflection methods on self-regulated learning strategies and learning motivation among emergency medical technicians: a quasi-experimental study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1