Empowering nurses and midwives: the evidence-base for the Nurses and Midwives Certification Programme of ESHRE†.

IF 6 1区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Human reproduction Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1093/humrep/deae175
S Somers, H Cotton, H Kendrew, J Pomper, A Pinborg, I R Jorgensen, C Plas, E H Hanenberg, V L Peddie, E A F Dancet
{"title":"Empowering nurses and midwives: the evidence-base for the Nurses and Midwives Certification Programme of ESHRE†.","authors":"S Somers, H Cotton, H Kendrew, J Pomper, A Pinborg, I R Jorgensen, C Plas, E H Hanenberg, V L Peddie, E A F Dancet","doi":"10.1093/humrep/deae175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study question: </strong>How were the logbook and curriculum for the Nurses and Midwives Certification Programme of ESHRE developed?</p><p><strong>Summary answer: </strong>The logbook and corresponding curriculum for the ESHRE Nurses and Midwives Certification Programme were based on an extensive literature review, an international expert panel, and a survey of Belgian and Dutch nurses and midwives (N&M) working in reproductive medicine (RM).</p><p><strong>What is known already: </strong>ESHRE has been running a certification programme for N&M working in RM since 2015. To the best of our knowledge, clinical practice guidelines for nursing/midwifery care within RM are lacking as is consensus on role descriptors of N&M working in RM.</p><p><strong>Study design, size, duration: </strong>The Nurses and Midwives Certification Committee (NMCC), established by the ESHRE Executive Committee in 2012, decided to gather background information by: (i) systematically reviewing the literature on the tasks of N&M working in RM, (ii) consulting and surveying an expert panel of international senior N&M, and (iii) surveying Belgian and Dutch N&M working in RM across different clinics. Finally, the NMCC developed a logbook and curriculum fostering a more expanded theoretic background.</p><p><strong>Participants/materials, setting, methods: </strong>The NMCC comprised four N&M, one clinical embryologist, and one gynaecologist (both in an advisory capacity). The Medline database was searched for papers relating to the tasks of N&M working in RM, by entering a search string in PubMed. In an attempt to capture insight into the tasks and roles of N&M working in RM, the NMCC subsequently surveyed N&M experts across nine countries (Denmark, Finland, France, Norway, Slovenia, Sweden, Turkey, Ukraine, and the UK), and 48 Belgian and Dutch N&M working in RM.</p><p><strong>Main results and the role of chance: </strong>There were 36 papers on the tasks of N&M working in RM originating from 13 countries (in Asia, Oceania, Europe, and North America), identified. Initially, 43 tasks in which N&M working in RM participated, were identified by literature only (n = 5), the international expert panel only (n = 4), Belgian and Dutch N&M working in RM only (n = 5), or a combination of two (n = 13) or three (n = 16) of these sources. The number and composition of tasks included in the logbook were adapted yearly based on novel insights by the NMCC. In response to the annual review, the extended role of N&M working in RM is now reflected in the 2024 version by 73 tasks. Seven specialist tasks (i.e. embryo transfer) were performed independently by N&M working in RM in some countries, while in other countries N&M merely had an 'assisting' role. Candidates are also expected to submit a mature ethical reflection on one clinical case. To support applicants throughout the certification process, the NMCC developed a curriculum in line with all tasks of N&M working in RM.</p><p><strong>Limitations, reasons for caution: </strong>The literature review was not completed prior to consulting the international expert panel or surveying the Belgian and Dutch N&M working in RM.</p><p><strong>Wider implications of the findings: </strong>The differences in tasks and roles of N&M working in RM across and within countries, clinics and individuals illustrated by the literature review, the international expert panel, and the surveyed Belgian and Dutch N&M working in RM suggest an opportunity for structured professional development. Further research is required to elicit the post-certification experience of N&M working in RM and its impact on their professional development.</p><p><strong>Study funding/competing interest(s): </strong>The expert panel meeting was funded by ESHRE and the literature review and surveys were supported by Leuven University (Belgium) and the postdoctoral fellowship of the Research Foundation Flanders of E.A.F.D. H.K. received consulting fees and honoraria from Gedeon Richter, Finox and MEDEA, and travel support from Gedeon Richter and Finox. The other authors declare no conflict of interest.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>N/A.</p>","PeriodicalId":13003,"journal":{"name":"Human reproduction","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11447058/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human reproduction","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deae175","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study question: How were the logbook and curriculum for the Nurses and Midwives Certification Programme of ESHRE developed?

Summary answer: The logbook and corresponding curriculum for the ESHRE Nurses and Midwives Certification Programme were based on an extensive literature review, an international expert panel, and a survey of Belgian and Dutch nurses and midwives (N&M) working in reproductive medicine (RM).

What is known already: ESHRE has been running a certification programme for N&M working in RM since 2015. To the best of our knowledge, clinical practice guidelines for nursing/midwifery care within RM are lacking as is consensus on role descriptors of N&M working in RM.

Study design, size, duration: The Nurses and Midwives Certification Committee (NMCC), established by the ESHRE Executive Committee in 2012, decided to gather background information by: (i) systematically reviewing the literature on the tasks of N&M working in RM, (ii) consulting and surveying an expert panel of international senior N&M, and (iii) surveying Belgian and Dutch N&M working in RM across different clinics. Finally, the NMCC developed a logbook and curriculum fostering a more expanded theoretic background.

Participants/materials, setting, methods: The NMCC comprised four N&M, one clinical embryologist, and one gynaecologist (both in an advisory capacity). The Medline database was searched for papers relating to the tasks of N&M working in RM, by entering a search string in PubMed. In an attempt to capture insight into the tasks and roles of N&M working in RM, the NMCC subsequently surveyed N&M experts across nine countries (Denmark, Finland, France, Norway, Slovenia, Sweden, Turkey, Ukraine, and the UK), and 48 Belgian and Dutch N&M working in RM.

Main results and the role of chance: There were 36 papers on the tasks of N&M working in RM originating from 13 countries (in Asia, Oceania, Europe, and North America), identified. Initially, 43 tasks in which N&M working in RM participated, were identified by literature only (n = 5), the international expert panel only (n = 4), Belgian and Dutch N&M working in RM only (n = 5), or a combination of two (n = 13) or three (n = 16) of these sources. The number and composition of tasks included in the logbook were adapted yearly based on novel insights by the NMCC. In response to the annual review, the extended role of N&M working in RM is now reflected in the 2024 version by 73 tasks. Seven specialist tasks (i.e. embryo transfer) were performed independently by N&M working in RM in some countries, while in other countries N&M merely had an 'assisting' role. Candidates are also expected to submit a mature ethical reflection on one clinical case. To support applicants throughout the certification process, the NMCC developed a curriculum in line with all tasks of N&M working in RM.

Limitations, reasons for caution: The literature review was not completed prior to consulting the international expert panel or surveying the Belgian and Dutch N&M working in RM.

Wider implications of the findings: The differences in tasks and roles of N&M working in RM across and within countries, clinics and individuals illustrated by the literature review, the international expert panel, and the surveyed Belgian and Dutch N&M working in RM suggest an opportunity for structured professional development. Further research is required to elicit the post-certification experience of N&M working in RM and its impact on their professional development.

Study funding/competing interest(s): The expert panel meeting was funded by ESHRE and the literature review and surveys were supported by Leuven University (Belgium) and the postdoctoral fellowship of the Research Foundation Flanders of E.A.F.D. H.K. received consulting fees and honoraria from Gedeon Richter, Finox and MEDEA, and travel support from Gedeon Richter and Finox. The other authors declare no conflict of interest.

Trial registration number: N/A.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
增强护士和助产士的能力:ESHRE† 护士和助产士认证计划的证据基础。
研究问题:ESHRE 护士和助产士认证计划的日志和课程是如何制定的?ESHRE 护士和助产士认证计划的日志和相应课程基于广泛的文献综述、国际专家小组以及对比利时和荷兰从事生殖医学(RM)工作的护士和助产士(N&M)的调查:ESHRE 自 2015 年以来一直在为从事生殖医学工作的 N&M 开展认证计划。据我们所知,目前尚缺乏生殖医学护理/助产护理的临床实践指南,也未就生殖医学护理/助产护理的角色描述达成共识:护士和助产士认证委员会(NMCC)由 ESHRE 执行委员会于 2012 年成立,决定通过以下方式收集背景信息:(i)系统地查阅有关在生殖医学领域工作的护士和助产士任务的文献,(ii)咨询和调查国际资深护士和助产士专家小组,(iii)调查在不同诊所从事生殖医学工作的比利时和荷兰护士和助产士。最后,NMCC 编制了日志和课程,以促进更广泛的理论背景:NMCC 由四名 N&M、一名临床胚胎学家和一名妇科医生(均为顾问)组成。通过在 PubMed 中输入搜索字符串,在 Medline 数据库中搜索与在 RM 中工作的 N&M 任务相关的论文。为了深入了解在生殖健康领域工作的 N&M 的任务和角色,NMCC 随后对 9 个国家(丹麦、芬兰、法国、挪威、斯洛文尼亚、瑞典、土耳其、乌克兰和英国)的 N&M 专家以及 48 名在生殖健康领域工作的比利时和荷兰 N&M 进行了调查:共有来自 13 个国家(亚洲、大洋洲、欧洲和北美洲)的 36 篇关于从事 RM 工作的 N&M 任务的论文。最初,仅通过文献(n = 5)、仅通过国际专家小组(n = 4)、仅通过比利时和荷兰从事人力资源管理工作的非人力资源管理人员(n = 5),或通过上述来源中的两个(n = 13)或三个(n = 16)的组合,确定了 43 项从事人力资源管理工作的非人力资源管理人员参与的任务。日志中包含的任务数量和构成每年都会根据国家监测协调中心的新见解进行调整。根据年度审查结果,在 2024 年版本中,73 项任务反映了在 RM 工作的 N&M 的扩展作用。在一些国家,有七项专业任务(如胚胎移植)由在生殖医学领域工作的 N&M 独立完成,而在其他国家,N&M 仅发挥 "协助 "作用。候选人还需就一个临床病例提交成熟的伦理反思。为了在整个认证过程中为申请人提供支持,NMCC 制定了与从事 RM 工作的 N&M 的所有任务相一致的课程:文献综述没有在咨询国际专家小组或调查比利时和荷兰从事 RM 工作的 N&M 之前完成:文献综述、国际专家小组以及接受调查的比利时和荷兰从事 RM 工作的 N&M 的任务和角色在不同国家和国家内部、诊所和个人之间存在差异,这为有组织的专业发展提供了机会。需要开展进一步研究,以了解从事 RM 工作的 N&M 在获得认证后的经历及其对专业发展的影响:H.K. 从 Gedeon Richter、Finox 和 MEDEA 获得了咨询费和酬金,并从 Gedeon Richter 和 Finox 获得了差旅费资助。其他作者声明无利益冲突:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Human reproduction
Human reproduction 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.60%
发文量
1369
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Human Reproduction features full-length, peer-reviewed papers reporting original research, concise clinical case reports, as well as opinions and debates on topical issues. Papers published cover the clinical science and medical aspects of reproductive physiology, pathology and endocrinology; including andrology, gonad function, gametogenesis, fertilization, embryo development, implantation, early pregnancy, genetics, genetic diagnosis, oncology, infectious disease, surgery, contraception, infertility treatment, psychology, ethics and social issues.
期刊最新文献
Upregulated let-7 expression in the follicular fluid of patients with endometriomas leads to dysfunction of granulosa cells through targeting of IGF1R Reproductive factors and biological aging: the association with all-cause and cause-specific premature mortality The role of state-of-the-art IVF care as a marker of societal development Road to in vitro maturation (IVM), from basic science to an informed clinical practice. Embryo multinucleation: detection, possible origins, and implications for treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1