Identifying the risk factors of patient safety in internet hospitals: A mixed methods study

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES Health Policy and Technology Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.hlpt.2024.100897
Sha Liu , Yinhuan Hu , Xiaoyue Wu , Gang Li , Liuming Wang , Yeyan Zhang , Jinghan Zhou
{"title":"Identifying the risk factors of patient safety in internet hospitals: A mixed methods study","authors":"Sha Liu ,&nbsp;Yinhuan Hu ,&nbsp;Xiaoyue Wu ,&nbsp;Gang Li ,&nbsp;Liuming Wang ,&nbsp;Yeyan Zhang ,&nbsp;Jinghan Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.hlpt.2024.100897","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to identify key risk factors and their interrelationships for patient safety in internet hospitals from a system perspective, using mixed methods of qualitative and quantitative analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This study constructed a comprehensive indicator system of patient safety risk factors in internet hospitals by qualitative analysis using the Patient Safety Systems (SEIPS) model as a framework. Risk factors were initially identified through a literature review and subsequently refined using a Delphi survey involving 24 experts related to internet hospitals in China. The identified indicators were quantitatively analyzed to determine key risk factors and their influencing mechanism using the Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) and Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) methods.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The qualitative analysis established a patient safety risk factor indicator system for internet hospitals, comprising 23 elements across six dimensions. Quantitative analysis employing the DEMATEL-ISM approach revealed that risk management has the highest centrality. Among cause factors, task complexity exerts the most significant impact on other factors, while network information security exhibits the highest absolute value among result factors. Risk factors are categorized into three levels: surface, deep, and root factors, with task complexity, legal and regulatory, and guidance policy being the root factors at the foundation of the system.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our study offered a systemic perspective on analyzing risk factors for patient safety in internet hospitals. Policymakers and managers of internet hospitals should take advantage of the interrelationships among these factors to mitigate patient safety risks by effectively controlling key factors.</p></div><div><h3>Public Interest Summary</h3><p>In the rapidly evolving landscape of internet hospitals, ensuring patient safety is paramount. This study aimed to comprehensively identify and understand key risk factors influencing patient safety within these digital healthcare platforms. Using mixed methods of qualitative and quantitative analysis, the study examined the intricate interplay of factors affecting patient safety. Our methodology involved constructing a risk factors indicator system based on the Patient Safety Systems (SEIPS) model. By employing the integrated Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory along with the Interpretive Structural Modeling method, we unveiled the core risk factors and their intricate relationships. Recognizing the interconnectivity of these factors allows us to develop effective risk mitigation strategies that enhance patient safety in internet hospitals. This study encourages stakeholders to leverage the dynamic relationships among these factors to ensure safer online healthcare experiences for patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48672,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy and Technology","volume":"13 4","pages":"Article 100897"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211883724000601","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

The purpose of this study was to identify key risk factors and their interrelationships for patient safety in internet hospitals from a system perspective, using mixed methods of qualitative and quantitative analysis.

Methods

This study constructed a comprehensive indicator system of patient safety risk factors in internet hospitals by qualitative analysis using the Patient Safety Systems (SEIPS) model as a framework. Risk factors were initially identified through a literature review and subsequently refined using a Delphi survey involving 24 experts related to internet hospitals in China. The identified indicators were quantitatively analyzed to determine key risk factors and their influencing mechanism using the Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory (DEMATEL) and Interpretive Structural Modeling (ISM) methods.

Results

The qualitative analysis established a patient safety risk factor indicator system for internet hospitals, comprising 23 elements across six dimensions. Quantitative analysis employing the DEMATEL-ISM approach revealed that risk management has the highest centrality. Among cause factors, task complexity exerts the most significant impact on other factors, while network information security exhibits the highest absolute value among result factors. Risk factors are categorized into three levels: surface, deep, and root factors, with task complexity, legal and regulatory, and guidance policy being the root factors at the foundation of the system.

Conclusions

Our study offered a systemic perspective on analyzing risk factors for patient safety in internet hospitals. Policymakers and managers of internet hospitals should take advantage of the interrelationships among these factors to mitigate patient safety risks by effectively controlling key factors.

Public Interest Summary

In the rapidly evolving landscape of internet hospitals, ensuring patient safety is paramount. This study aimed to comprehensively identify and understand key risk factors influencing patient safety within these digital healthcare platforms. Using mixed methods of qualitative and quantitative analysis, the study examined the intricate interplay of factors affecting patient safety. Our methodology involved constructing a risk factors indicator system based on the Patient Safety Systems (SEIPS) model. By employing the integrated Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory along with the Interpretive Structural Modeling method, we unveiled the core risk factors and their intricate relationships. Recognizing the interconnectivity of these factors allows us to develop effective risk mitigation strategies that enhance patient safety in internet hospitals. This study encourages stakeholders to leverage the dynamic relationships among these factors to ensure safer online healthcare experiences for patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
识别互联网医院患者安全的风险因素:混合方法研究
方法 本研究以患者安全系统(SEIPS)模型为框架,通过定性分析构建了互联网医院患者安全风险因素的综合指标体系。通过文献综述对风险因素进行初步识别,随后通过德尔菲调查对风险因素进行细化,共有 24 位中国互联网医院相关专家参与了调查。定性分析建立了互联网医院患者安全风险因素指标体系,包括六个维度的 23 个要素。采用 DEMATEL-ISM 方法进行的定量分析显示,风险管理具有最高的中心性。在原因因素中,任务复杂性对其他因素的影响最大,而在结果因素中,网络信息安全的绝对值最高。风险因素分为表层因素、深层因素和根本因素三个层次,其中任务复杂性、法律法规和指导政策是系统基础的根本因素。互联网医院的政策制定者和管理者应利用这些因素之间的相互关系,通过有效控制关键因素来降低患者安全风险。本研究旨在全面识别和了解这些数字医疗平台中影响患者安全的关键风险因素。本研究采用定性和定量分析相结合的方法,对影响患者安全的各种因素之间错综复杂的相互作用进行了研究。我们的方法包括根据患者安全系统(SEIPS)模型构建风险因素指标体系。通过综合决策试验和评估实验室以及解释性结构建模方法,我们揭示了核心风险因素及其错综复杂的关系。认识到这些因素之间的相互联系,我们就能制定有效的风险缓解策略,从而提高互联网医院的患者安全。本研究鼓励利益相关者利用这些因素之间的动态关系,确保患者获得更安全的在线医疗体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Policy and Technology
Health Policy and Technology Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
78
审稿时长
88 days
期刊介绍: Health Policy and Technology (HPT), is the official journal of the Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine (FPM), a cross-disciplinary journal, which focuses on past, present and future health policy and the role of technology in clinical and non-clinical national and international health environments. HPT provides a further excellent way for the FPM to continue to make important national and international contributions to development of policy and practice within medicine and related disciplines. The aim of HPT is to publish relevant, timely and accessible articles and commentaries to support policy-makers, health professionals, health technology providers, patient groups and academia interested in health policy and technology. Topics covered by HPT will include: - Health technology, including drug discovery, diagnostics, medicines, devices, therapeutic delivery and eHealth systems - Cross-national comparisons on health policy using evidence-based approaches - National studies on health policy to determine the outcomes of technology-driven initiatives - Cross-border eHealth including health tourism - The digital divide in mobility, access and affordability of healthcare - Health technology assessment (HTA) methods and tools for evaluating the effectiveness of clinical and non-clinical health technologies - Health and eHealth indicators and benchmarks (measure/metrics) for understanding the adoption and diffusion of health technologies - Health and eHealth models and frameworks to support policy-makers and other stakeholders in decision-making - Stakeholder engagement with health technologies (clinical and patient/citizen buy-in) - Regulation and health economics
期刊最新文献
Challenges of shared decision-making in virtual care: Whom should we care for, and how? Individual factors that affect laypeople's understanding of definitions of medical jargon An insight into the implementation, utilization, and evaluation of telemedicine e-consultation services in Egypt Multiple criteria qualitative value-based pricing framework “MARIE” for new drugs Assessing contributing and mediating factors of telemedicine on healthcare provider burnout
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1