Droperidol administration among emergency department patients with abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE American Journal of Emergency Medicine Pub Date : 2024-08-05 DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2024.07.060
{"title":"Droperidol administration among emergency department patients with abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.ajem.2024.07.060","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Study objective</h3><p>The primary objective of this study was to examine the common usage patterns of droperidol in the relatively unrestricted environment of an urban, academic medical center. We focused specifically on the most common use of droperidol in our department: patients with a chief complaint of abdominal pain, nausea, and/or vomiting.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>For this retrospective, observational, single-center study, we extracted records of all administrations of droperidol from August 2019 to August 2020. Patients with a chief complaint of abdominal pain, nausea, or vomiting, or any combination thereof, were included in data analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Between April 2019 to August 2020, 830 discrete patient visits involving droperidol administration were identified, comprising 706 patients. The average age was 39 years old with a range of 15 to 80. Seven patients (0.08%) were younger than 18, and 35 (4%) were older than 65. Five hundred sixty-five patients (68%) were female. Droperidol doses ranged from 0.625 mg to 5 mg intravenous (IV), with a median dose of 0.625 mg (interquartile range 0.625–1.25 mg), with 590 patients (71%) receiving a dose of 0.625 mg. Only 19 patients (2.3%) had a documented adverse event. Seven had akathisia or restlessness, 7 had anxiety or agitation, 3 had dystonia or stiffness, 1 had fatigue, and 1 had dizziness. For the entire cohort, there were no cardiac dysrhythmias, syncope, seizures, other major adverse events, or fatalities recorded.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>At one institution, droperidol is being used commonly for the chief complaints of abdominal pain, nausea, and/or vomiting. The preferred dosing is nearly universally below the 2.5 mg IV dose for which the FDA warning applies. Similar to previous studies, identification of adverse events was rare, and no major adverse outcomes such as dysrhythmia or death were identified.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55536,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735675724003814","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study objective

The primary objective of this study was to examine the common usage patterns of droperidol in the relatively unrestricted environment of an urban, academic medical center. We focused specifically on the most common use of droperidol in our department: patients with a chief complaint of abdominal pain, nausea, and/or vomiting.

Methods

For this retrospective, observational, single-center study, we extracted records of all administrations of droperidol from August 2019 to August 2020. Patients with a chief complaint of abdominal pain, nausea, or vomiting, or any combination thereof, were included in data analysis.

Results

Between April 2019 to August 2020, 830 discrete patient visits involving droperidol administration were identified, comprising 706 patients. The average age was 39 years old with a range of 15 to 80. Seven patients (0.08%) were younger than 18, and 35 (4%) were older than 65. Five hundred sixty-five patients (68%) were female. Droperidol doses ranged from 0.625 mg to 5 mg intravenous (IV), with a median dose of 0.625 mg (interquartile range 0.625–1.25 mg), with 590 patients (71%) receiving a dose of 0.625 mg. Only 19 patients (2.3%) had a documented adverse event. Seven had akathisia or restlessness, 7 had anxiety or agitation, 3 had dystonia or stiffness, 1 had fatigue, and 1 had dizziness. For the entire cohort, there were no cardiac dysrhythmias, syncope, seizures, other major adverse events, or fatalities recorded.

Conclusion

At one institution, droperidol is being used commonly for the chief complaints of abdominal pain, nausea, and/or vomiting. The preferred dosing is nearly universally below the 2.5 mg IV dose for which the FDA warning applies. Similar to previous studies, identification of adverse events was rare, and no major adverse outcomes such as dysrhythmia or death were identified.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急诊科腹痛、恶心和呕吐患者的屈哌醇用药情况
研究目的本研究的主要目的是在城市学术医疗中心相对不受限制的环境中研究屈培多的常见使用模式。我们特别关注了我们科室最常见的屈培多使用情况:主诉为腹痛、恶心和/或呕吐的患者。方法在这项回顾性、观察性、单中心研究中,我们提取了 2019 年 8 月至 2020 年 8 月期间屈培多的所有用药记录。结果在 2019 年 4 月至 2020 年 8 月期间,共确定了 830 次涉及屈培利多用药的不连续患者就诊,其中包括 706 名患者。平均年龄为 39 岁,年龄范围为 15 至 80 岁。7名患者(0.08%)小于18岁,35名患者(4%)大于65岁。565名患者(68%)为女性。屈培利多的剂量从 0.625 毫克到 5 毫克不等,中位剂量为 0.625 毫克(四分位间范围为 0.625-1.25 毫克),其中 590 名患者(71%)的剂量为 0.625 毫克。只有 19 名患者(2.3%)发生了有记录的不良事件。其中 7 人出现了运动障碍或烦躁不安,7 人出现了焦虑或激动,3 人出现了肌张力障碍或僵硬,1 人出现了疲劳,1 人出现了头晕。结论在一家机构中,屈培利多常用于主诉腹痛、恶心和/或呕吐的患者。首选剂量几乎普遍低于 2.5 毫克静脉注射剂量,美国食品及药物管理局对此发出了警告。与之前的研究类似,不良事件的发现很少,也未发现心律失常或死亡等重大不良后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
730
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: A distinctive blend of practicality and scholarliness makes the American Journal of Emergency Medicine a key source for information on emergency medical care. Covering all activities concerned with emergency medicine, it is the journal to turn to for information to help increase the ability to understand, recognize and treat emergency conditions. Issues contain clinical articles, case reports, review articles, editorials, international notes, book reviews and more.
期刊最新文献
Gabapentinoid prescribing patterns and predictors utilizing neural networks:Comment. Why is oral diltiazem protocol more effective than intravenous protocol for acute rate control in the emergency department? Epidemiology of heart failure presentations to United States emergency departments from 2016 to 2023. Characterizing emergency department surgical airway placement in the setting of trauma - A reply with a data-in-brief analysis of the pediatric cricothyrotomy. An update of the severe trauma scoring system using the Korean National Emergency Department Information System (NEDIS) database.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1