{"title":"The effect of formative assessment on students' clinical knowledge, skills and self-efficacy levels","authors":"Rukiye Kokkiz , Demet Inangil , Ilayda Turkoglu","doi":"10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>This research aims to examine the effect of using formative assessment methods in clinical education on students' knowledge, skills and self-efficacy levels.</p></div><div><h3>Background</h3><p>Formative assessment is used as a method designed to identify areas where students fall short and provide feedback for improvement. Formative assessment and feedback represent fundamental characteristics of quality teaching in higher education and play a decisive role in learning in nursing education. Although educators observe students performing practical tasks during clinical education, evaluation is not made by a structured control list. Therefore, just as nursing students are evaluated with “Skill Checklists” in the OSCE exam, there is a need to evaluate nursing skills during patient care in the clinical field.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>The study was designed as a pre-test post-test randomized controlled experimental study.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Before the research, both groups filled out the self-efficacy form. The experimental group received formative assessment throughout the course. At the end of the semester, all students were given a skills test and asked to fill out the self-efficacy form again. Finally, a knowledge test was administered to the entire class.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The average knowledge score of the experimental group is higher than the control group. It was determined that there was a statistical difference of 16.54 points in the average skill scores between the groups. Posttests showed significant differences in skills such as breathing-cough exercise, basic glycemic measurement, subcutaneous injection and blood collection skills.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>It was determined that the formative assessment method increased nursing students' knowledge, skills and self-efficacy levels regarding basic nursing skills.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48715,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Education in Practice","volume":"80 ","pages":"Article 104120"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Education in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S147159532400249X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim
This research aims to examine the effect of using formative assessment methods in clinical education on students' knowledge, skills and self-efficacy levels.
Background
Formative assessment is used as a method designed to identify areas where students fall short and provide feedback for improvement. Formative assessment and feedback represent fundamental characteristics of quality teaching in higher education and play a decisive role in learning in nursing education. Although educators observe students performing practical tasks during clinical education, evaluation is not made by a structured control list. Therefore, just as nursing students are evaluated with “Skill Checklists” in the OSCE exam, there is a need to evaluate nursing skills during patient care in the clinical field.
Design
The study was designed as a pre-test post-test randomized controlled experimental study.
Method
Before the research, both groups filled out the self-efficacy form. The experimental group received formative assessment throughout the course. At the end of the semester, all students were given a skills test and asked to fill out the self-efficacy form again. Finally, a knowledge test was administered to the entire class.
Results
The average knowledge score of the experimental group is higher than the control group. It was determined that there was a statistical difference of 16.54 points in the average skill scores between the groups. Posttests showed significant differences in skills such as breathing-cough exercise, basic glycemic measurement, subcutaneous injection and blood collection skills.
Conclusion
It was determined that the formative assessment method increased nursing students' knowledge, skills and self-efficacy levels regarding basic nursing skills.
期刊介绍:
Nurse Education in Practice enables lecturers and practitioners to both share and disseminate evidence that demonstrates the actual practice of education as it is experienced in the realities of their respective work environments. It is supportive of new authors and will be at the forefront in publishing individual and collaborative papers that demonstrate the link between education and practice.