The effect of formative assessment on students' clinical knowledge, skills and self-efficacy levels

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Nurse Education in Practice Pub Date : 2024-08-28 DOI:10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104120
{"title":"The effect of formative assessment on students' clinical knowledge, skills and self-efficacy levels","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>This research aims to examine the effect of using formative assessment methods in clinical education on students' knowledge, skills and self-efficacy levels.</p></div><div><h3>Background</h3><p>Formative assessment is used as a method designed to identify areas where students fall short and provide feedback for improvement. Formative assessment and feedback represent fundamental characteristics of quality teaching in higher education and play a decisive role in learning in nursing education. Although educators observe students performing practical tasks during clinical education, evaluation is not made by a structured control list. Therefore, just as nursing students are evaluated with “Skill Checklists” in the OSCE exam, there is a need to evaluate nursing skills during patient care in the clinical field.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>The study was designed as a pre-test post-test randomized controlled experimental study.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Before the research, both groups filled out the self-efficacy form. The experimental group received formative assessment throughout the course. At the end of the semester, all students were given a skills test and asked to fill out the self-efficacy form again. Finally, a knowledge test was administered to the entire class.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The average knowledge score of the experimental group is higher than the control group. It was determined that there was a statistical difference of 16.54 points in the average skill scores between the groups. Posttests showed significant differences in skills such as breathing-cough exercise, basic glycemic measurement, subcutaneous injection and blood collection skills.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>It was determined that the formative assessment method increased nursing students' knowledge, skills and self-efficacy levels regarding basic nursing skills.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48715,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Education in Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Education in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S147159532400249X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

This research aims to examine the effect of using formative assessment methods in clinical education on students' knowledge, skills and self-efficacy levels.

Background

Formative assessment is used as a method designed to identify areas where students fall short and provide feedback for improvement. Formative assessment and feedback represent fundamental characteristics of quality teaching in higher education and play a decisive role in learning in nursing education. Although educators observe students performing practical tasks during clinical education, evaluation is not made by a structured control list. Therefore, just as nursing students are evaluated with “Skill Checklists” in the OSCE exam, there is a need to evaluate nursing skills during patient care in the clinical field.

Design

The study was designed as a pre-test post-test randomized controlled experimental study.

Method

Before the research, both groups filled out the self-efficacy form. The experimental group received formative assessment throughout the course. At the end of the semester, all students were given a skills test and asked to fill out the self-efficacy form again. Finally, a knowledge test was administered to the entire class.

Results

The average knowledge score of the experimental group is higher than the control group. It was determined that there was a statistical difference of 16.54 points in the average skill scores between the groups. Posttests showed significant differences in skills such as breathing-cough exercise, basic glycemic measurement, subcutaneous injection and blood collection skills.

Conclusion

It was determined that the formative assessment method increased nursing students' knowledge, skills and self-efficacy levels regarding basic nursing skills.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
形成性评估对学生临床知识、技能和自我效能水平的影响
背景形成性评估是一种旨在发现学生不足之处并提供改进反馈的方法。形成性评估和反馈代表了高等教育优质教学的基本特征,在护理教育的学习中起着决定性的作用。虽然在临床教学中,教育者会观察学生的实际操作,但评价并不是通过结构化的对照表进行的。因此,正如在 OSCE 考试中用 "技能对照表 "评价护生一样,有必要在临床护理病人的过程中对护理技能进行评价。实验组在整个课程期间接受形成性评估。学期末,所有学生都接受了技能测试,并被要求再次填写自我效能表。最后,对全班学生进行了一次知识测试。经测定,实验组与对照组的平均技能得分在统计学上相差 16.54 分。后测结果显示,实验组在呼吸-咳嗽练习、基本血糖测量、皮下注射和采血技能等技能方面差异显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
9.40%
发文量
180
审稿时长
51 days
期刊介绍: Nurse Education in Practice enables lecturers and practitioners to both share and disseminate evidence that demonstrates the actual practice of education as it is experienced in the realities of their respective work environments. It is supportive of new authors and will be at the forefront in publishing individual and collaborative papers that demonstrate the link between education and practice.
期刊最新文献
“Removing the home court advantage”: A qualitative evaluation of LEGO® as an interprofessional simulation icebreaker for midwifery and medical students Does being involved in a research project enhance the postgraduate taught student experience: A qualitative research case study Investigating clinical decision-making in bleeding complications among nursing students: A longitudinal mixed-methods study Simulation as a method in a supervision course, experiences of midwives and specialist nurses: A qualitative study Characteristics of nursing educators' professional competency standards: A scoping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1