Are nursing students ready to respond to disasters? A study on self-efficacy of nursing students to apply psychological first aid

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Nurse Education Today Pub Date : 2024-08-19 DOI:10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106367
Nurhayat Kılıç Bayageldi , Dilek Kaloğlu Binici
{"title":"Are nursing students ready to respond to disasters? A study on self-efficacy of nursing students to apply psychological first aid","authors":"Nurhayat Kılıç Bayageldi ,&nbsp;Dilek Kaloğlu Binici","doi":"10.1016/j.nedt.2024.106367","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Psychological first aid (PFA) is an effective initial response to disasters. Nursing students are an important human resource for supporting health services during and after disasters. Improving nursing students' PFA application competencies is necessary for both themselves and aid providers.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>This study aimed to determine sernior nursing students' self-efficacy in psychological first aid application in disaster situations.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>This was a descriptive cross-sectional study.</p></div><div><h3>Setting and participants</h3><p>A total of 536 senior nursing students who had received undergraduate nursing education in Turkey participated in this study.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Data were collected between March and June 2022, using an online questionnaire comprising a “Personal Information Form” and “PFA Application Self-Efficacy Scale.” The data obtained were analyzed using descriptive statistics, independent samples <em>t</em>-test, Mann–Whitney <em>U</em> test, one-way analysis of variance, Kruskal–Wallis test, multiple comparison tests, and linear regression analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The average age of the senior nursing students was 21.82 ± 2.23 years. Overall, 89.6 % of the students had not received PFA service from any institution. Furthermore, 91.4 % had not received PFA training at any institution. The students' mean score on the PFA application self-efficacy scale was 123.37 ± 22.92. Students who received PFA training had high average scores.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>It is necessary to develop senior nursing students' self-efficacy in PFA application. In this context, it is recommended that systematic training, including training on the application of PFA, be conducted regularly along with applied studies on disaster response situations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54704,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Education Today","volume":"143 ","pages":"Article 106367"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Education Today","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0260691724002776","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Psychological first aid (PFA) is an effective initial response to disasters. Nursing students are an important human resource for supporting health services during and after disasters. Improving nursing students' PFA application competencies is necessary for both themselves and aid providers.

Aim

This study aimed to determine sernior nursing students' self-efficacy in psychological first aid application in disaster situations.

Design

This was a descriptive cross-sectional study.

Setting and participants

A total of 536 senior nursing students who had received undergraduate nursing education in Turkey participated in this study.

Methods

Data were collected between March and June 2022, using an online questionnaire comprising a “Personal Information Form” and “PFA Application Self-Efficacy Scale.” The data obtained were analyzed using descriptive statistics, independent samples t-test, Mann–Whitney U test, one-way analysis of variance, Kruskal–Wallis test, multiple comparison tests, and linear regression analysis.

Results

The average age of the senior nursing students was 21.82 ± 2.23 years. Overall, 89.6 % of the students had not received PFA service from any institution. Furthermore, 91.4 % had not received PFA training at any institution. The students' mean score on the PFA application self-efficacy scale was 123.37 ± 22.92. Students who received PFA training had high average scores.

Conclusions

It is necessary to develop senior nursing students' self-efficacy in PFA application. In this context, it is recommended that systematic training, including training on the application of PFA, be conducted regularly along with applied studies on disaster response situations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
护理专业学生做好应对灾难的准备了吗?关于护理专业学生应用心理急救的自我效能的研究
背景心理急救(PFA)是应对灾难的有效初步措施。护理专业学生是灾中和灾后支持医疗服务的重要人力资源。本研究旨在确定高年级护理学生在灾难情况下应用心理急救的自我效能感。研究地点和参与者共有 536 名在土耳其接受本科护理教育的高年级护理学生参与了本研究。研究方法在 2022 年 3 月至 6 月期间,使用由 "个人信息表 "和 "心理急救应用自我效能感量表 "组成的在线问卷收集数据。采用描述性统计、独立样本 t 检验、Mann-Whitney U 检验、单因素方差分析、Kruskal-Wallis 检验、多重比较检验和线性回归分析对所获得的数据进行分析。总体而言,89.6% 的学生未在任何机构接受过 PFA 服务。此外,91.4% 的学生未在任何机构接受过 PFA 培训。学生们在 PFA 应用自我效能感量表上的平均得分为 123.37 ± 22.92。接受过 PFA 培训的学生平均得分较高。在此背景下,建议定期开展系统培训,包括 PFA 应用培训,以及灾难响应情况下的应用研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nurse Education Today
Nurse Education Today 医学-护理
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
12.80%
发文量
349
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nurse Education Today is the leading international journal providing a forum for the publication of high quality original research, review and debate in the discussion of nursing, midwifery and interprofessional health care education, publishing papers which contribute to the advancement of educational theory and pedagogy that support the evidence-based practice for educationalists worldwide. The journal stimulates and values critical scholarly debate on issues that have strategic relevance for leaders of health care education. The journal publishes the highest quality scholarly contributions reflecting the diversity of people, health and education systems worldwide, by publishing research that employs rigorous methodology as well as by publishing papers that highlight the theoretical underpinnings of education and systems globally. The journal will publish papers that show depth, rigour, originality and high standards of presentation, in particular, work that is original, analytical and constructively critical of both previous work and current initiatives. Authors are invited to submit original research, systematic and scholarly reviews, and critical papers which will stimulate debate on research, policy, theory or philosophy of nursing and related health care education, and which will meet and develop the journal''s high academic and ethical standards.
期刊最新文献
International nursing students' culture shock and academic engagement: The moderating role of resilience. Effects of a grouping intervention using the Felder-Silverman learning style model on problem-based learning among nursing students: A randomized controlled trial. Exploring nurse educators' preparation of clinical nurses and midwives for research utilization in practice: A qualitative study. Bachelor nursing competencies to care for children in hospital and home settings: A Delphi study. Developing an instrument to measure nurses' attitudes towards nursing students during clinical practice: A quantitative study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1