REARRANGE: Effort estimation approach for software clustering-based remodularisation

IF 3.8 2区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Information and Software Technology Pub Date : 2024-08-30 DOI:10.1016/j.infsof.2024.107567
Alvin Jian Jia Tan , Chun Yong Chong , Aldeida Aleti
{"title":"REARRANGE: Effort estimation approach for software clustering-based remodularisation","authors":"Alvin Jian Jia Tan ,&nbsp;Chun Yong Chong ,&nbsp;Aldeida Aleti","doi":"10.1016/j.infsof.2024.107567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Context:</h3><p>Most research in software clustering and remodularisation typically concludes by recommending the refactoring operations without further insight into the practicality of the proposed technique. Developers might be hesitant to follow through with the refactoring suggestions due to the uncertainty in the effort needed.</p></div><div><h3>Objective:</h3><p>This work aims to address this gap by introducing an effo<strong>R</strong>t <strong>E</strong>stimation <strong>A</strong>pp<strong>R</strong>oach fo<strong>R</strong> softw<strong>A</strong>re clusteri<strong>NG</strong>-based r<strong>E</strong>modularisation (REARRANGE) to close the loop in extant software clustering and remodularisation research by estimating the time required to carry out the suggested refactoring operations based on the history of the evolution of the software. By providing tangible estimates of refactoring effort in person-hours, we can inform developers of complex and time-consuming refactoring operations that will help prioritise refactoring efforts, allowing practitioners to weave in these activities during sprint planning.</p></div><div><h3>Method:</h3><p>REARRANGE builds a machine learning model to predict effort estimation based on past commit activity which extracts Software Features (lines of code, number of methods), Refactoring Features (refactoring type, source and destination) and Dependency Features (dependencies between classes). REARRANGE is then compared against sanity checks, baseline effort estimation models, and state-of-the-art software estimation models. We also attempt to cross-validate REARRANGE’s effort estimation with software developers.</p></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><p>Experimented through 25 open-source Java-based projects, the proposed approach estimated the refactoring effort of the test subjects with a Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of 5.47 person-hours against the MAE of the next-best approach of 453.31 person-hours. Based on a survey conducted among software developers, REARRANGE consistently delivers accurate estimates in 93.6% of cases.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion:</h3><p>The lack of a direct comparison for REARRANGE highlights the need for a refactoring effort-focused estimation model that provides tangible effort estimates in person-hours for refactoring operations. Only then can developers selectively choose relevant refactoring operations while considering the available time and budget constraints, bridging the gap between software clustering research and real-world application.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54983,"journal":{"name":"Information and Software Technology","volume":"176 ","pages":"Article 107567"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950584924001721/pdfft?md5=bd53a5ee1cbc06cd207117c50478f517&pid=1-s2.0-S0950584924001721-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information and Software Technology","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950584924001721","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context:

Most research in software clustering and remodularisation typically concludes by recommending the refactoring operations without further insight into the practicality of the proposed technique. Developers might be hesitant to follow through with the refactoring suggestions due to the uncertainty in the effort needed.

Objective:

This work aims to address this gap by introducing an effoRt Estimation AppRoach foR softwAre clusteriNG-based rEmodularisation (REARRANGE) to close the loop in extant software clustering and remodularisation research by estimating the time required to carry out the suggested refactoring operations based on the history of the evolution of the software. By providing tangible estimates of refactoring effort in person-hours, we can inform developers of complex and time-consuming refactoring operations that will help prioritise refactoring efforts, allowing practitioners to weave in these activities during sprint planning.

Method:

REARRANGE builds a machine learning model to predict effort estimation based on past commit activity which extracts Software Features (lines of code, number of methods), Refactoring Features (refactoring type, source and destination) and Dependency Features (dependencies between classes). REARRANGE is then compared against sanity checks, baseline effort estimation models, and state-of-the-art software estimation models. We also attempt to cross-validate REARRANGE’s effort estimation with software developers.

Results:

Experimented through 25 open-source Java-based projects, the proposed approach estimated the refactoring effort of the test subjects with a Mean Absolute Error (MAE) of 5.47 person-hours against the MAE of the next-best approach of 453.31 person-hours. Based on a survey conducted among software developers, REARRANGE consistently delivers accurate estimates in 93.6% of cases.

Conclusion:

The lack of a direct comparison for REARRANGE highlights the need for a refactoring effort-focused estimation model that provides tangible effort estimates in person-hours for refactoring operations. Only then can developers selectively choose relevant refactoring operations while considering the available time and budget constraints, bridging the gap between software clustering research and real-world application.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
REARRANGE:基于软件聚类的重模块化的努力估算方法
背景:软件聚类和重构方面的大多数研究通常以推荐重构操作结束,而没有进一步深入了解所建议技术的实用性。目标:这项工作旨在通过引入基于软件聚类的重构估算应用方法(REARRANGE)来弥补这一不足,根据软件的演变历史来估算执行建议的重构操作所需的时间,从而弥补现有软件聚类和重构研究中的不足。方法:REARRANGE 建立了一个机器学习模型,根据过去的提交活动预测工作量,该模型提取了软件特征(代码行数、方法数量)、重构特征(重构类型、源和目标)和依赖特征(类之间的依赖关系)。然后,我们将 REARRANGE 与正确性检查、基准工作量估算模型和最先进的软件估算模型进行比较。结果:通过对 25 个基于 Java 的开源项目进行实验,我们提出的方法估算出了测试对象的重构工作量,其平均绝对误差(MAE)为 5.47 人时,而次好方法的平均绝对误差(MAE)为 453.31 人时。结论:REARRANGE 缺乏直接比较,这突出表明需要一种以重构工作量为重点的估算模型,为重构操作提供以人时为单位的实际工作量估算。只有这样,开发人员才能在考虑可用时间和预算限制的同时,有选择性地选择相关的重构操作,从而缩小软件聚类研究与实际应用之间的差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Information and Software Technology
Information and Software Technology 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
164
审稿时长
9.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Information and Software Technology is the international archival journal focusing on research and experience that contributes to the improvement of software development practices. The journal''s scope includes methods and techniques to better engineer software and manage its development. Articles submitted for review should have a clear component of software engineering or address ways to improve the engineering and management of software development. Areas covered by the journal include: • Software management, quality and metrics, • Software processes, • Software architecture, modelling, specification, design and programming • Functional and non-functional software requirements • Software testing and verification & validation • Empirical studies of all aspects of engineering and managing software development Short Communications is a new section dedicated to short papers addressing new ideas, controversial opinions, "Negative" results and much more. Read the Guide for authors for more information. The journal encourages and welcomes submissions of systematic literature studies (reviews and maps) within the scope of the journal. Information and Software Technology is the premiere outlet for systematic literature studies in software engineering.
期刊最新文献
A software product line approach for developing hybrid software systems Evaluating the understandability and user acceptance of Attack-Defense Trees: Original experiment and replication On the road to interactive LLM-based systematic mapping studies Top-down: A better strategy for incremental covering array generation Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1