Examining how customers perceive community pharmacies based on Google maps reviews: Multivariable and sentiment analysis

IF 1.8 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100498
{"title":"Examining how customers perceive community pharmacies based on Google maps reviews: Multivariable and sentiment analysis","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>This study aims to understand customer perceptions of community pharmacies utilizing publicly available data from Google Maps platform.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>Python was used to scrape data with Google Maps APIs. As a result, 17,237 reviews were collected from 512 pharmacies distributed over Riyadh city, Saudi Arabia. Logistic regression was conducted to test the relationships between multiple variables and the given score. In addition, sentiment analysis using VADER (Valence Aware Dictionary for Sentiment Reasoning) model was conducted on written reviews, followed by cross-tabulation and chi-square tests.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The Logistic regression model implies that a unit increase in the Pharmacy score enhances the odds of attaining a higher score by approximately 3.734 times. The Mann–Whitney <em>U</em> test showed that a notable and statistically significant difference between “written reviews” and “unwritten reviews” (U = 39,928,072.5, <em>p</em> &lt; 0.001). The Pearson chi-square test generated a value of 2991.315 with 8 degrees of freedom, leading to a <em>p</em> value of 0.000.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>Our study found that the willingness of reviewers to write reviews depends on their perception. This study provides a descriptive analysis of conducted sentiment analysis using VADAR. The chi-square test indicates a significant relationship between rating scores and review sentiments.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study offers valuable findings on customer perception of community pharmacies using a new source of data.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73003,"journal":{"name":"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667276624000957/pdfft?md5=82611992fcf2eb629042786baf84411e&pid=1-s2.0-S2667276624000957-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667276624000957","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

This study aims to understand customer perceptions of community pharmacies utilizing publicly available data from Google Maps platform.

Materials and methods

Python was used to scrape data with Google Maps APIs. As a result, 17,237 reviews were collected from 512 pharmacies distributed over Riyadh city, Saudi Arabia. Logistic regression was conducted to test the relationships between multiple variables and the given score. In addition, sentiment analysis using VADER (Valence Aware Dictionary for Sentiment Reasoning) model was conducted on written reviews, followed by cross-tabulation and chi-square tests.

Results

The Logistic regression model implies that a unit increase in the Pharmacy score enhances the odds of attaining a higher score by approximately 3.734 times. The Mann–Whitney U test showed that a notable and statistically significant difference between “written reviews” and “unwritten reviews” (U = 39,928,072.5, p < 0.001). The Pearson chi-square test generated a value of 2991.315 with 8 degrees of freedom, leading to a p value of 0.000.

Discussion

Our study found that the willingness of reviewers to write reviews depends on their perception. This study provides a descriptive analysis of conducted sentiment analysis using VADAR. The chi-square test indicates a significant relationship between rating scores and review sentiments.

Conclusion

This study offers valuable findings on customer perception of community pharmacies using a new source of data.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
根据谷歌地图上的评论研究顾客对社区药房的看法:多变量和情感分析
本研究旨在利用谷歌地图平台的公开数据了解顾客对社区药房的看法。结果,从分布在沙特阿拉伯利雅得市的 512 家药店收集到 17,237 条评论。采用逻辑回归法测试多个变量与给定分数之间的关系。此外,还使用 VADER(情感推理词典)模型对书面评论进行了情感分析,随后进行了交叉分析和卡方检验。 结果逻辑回归模型表明,药店得分每增加一个单位,获得更高分数的几率就会增加约 3.734 倍。Mann-Whitney U 检验表明,"书面评论 "与 "非书面评论 "之间存在显著的统计学差异(U = 39,928,072.5, p <0.001)。我们的研究发现,评论者撰写评论的意愿取决于他们的认知。本研究对使用 VADAR 进行的情感分析进行了描述性分析。卡方检验表明,评分与评论情感之间存在显著关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
103 days
期刊最新文献
Montelukast deprescribing in outpatient specialty clinics: A single center cross-sectional study Appropriateness of direct oral anticoagulant dosing in patients with atrial fibrillation at a tertiary care hospital in Thailand Comparing nursing medication rounds before and after implementation of automated dispensing cabinets: A time and motion study Translation, transcultural adaptation, and validation of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the general medication adherence scale (GMAS) in patients with high blood pressure A cross-sectional survey exploring organizational readiness to implement community pharmacy-based opioid counseling and naloxone services in rural versus urban settings in Alabama
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1