Comparative analysis of parametric B-spline and Hermite cubic spline based methods for accurate ECG signal modeling

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of electrocardiology Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2024.153783
Alka Mishra, Surekha Bhusnur, Santosh Kumar Mishra, Pushpendra Singh
{"title":"Comparative analysis of parametric B-spline and Hermite cubic spline based methods for accurate ECG signal modeling","authors":"Alka Mishra,&nbsp;Surekha Bhusnur,&nbsp;Santosh Kumar Mishra,&nbsp;Pushpendra Singh","doi":"10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2024.153783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Analyzing Electrocardiogram (ECG) signals is imperative for diagnosing cardiovascular diseases. However, evaluating ECG analysis techniques faces challenges due to noise and artifacts in actual signals. Machine learning for automatic diagnosis encounters data acquisition hurdles due to medical data privacy constraints. Addressing these issues, ECG modeling assumes a crucial role in biomedical and parametric spline-based methods have garnered significant attention for their ability to accurately represent the complex temporal dynamics of ECG signals. This study conducts a comparative analysis of two parametric spline-based methods—B-spline and Hermite cubic spline—for ECG modeling, aiming to identify the most effective approach for accurate and reliable ECG representation. The Hermite cubic spline serves as one of the most effective interpolation methods, while B-spline is an approximation method. The comparative analysis includes both qualitative and quantitative evaluations. Qualitative assessment involves visually inspecting the generated spline-based models, comparing their resemblance to the original ECG signals, and employing power spectrum analysis. Quantitative analysis incorporates metrics such as root mean square error (RMSE), Percentage Root Mean Square Difference (PRD) and cross correlation, offering a more objective measure of the model's performance. Preliminary results indicate promising capabilities for both spline-based methods in representing ECG signals. However, the analysis unveils specific strengths and weaknesses for each method. The B-spline method offers greater flexibility and smoothness, while the cubic spline method demonstrates superior waveform capturing abilities with the preservation of control points, a critical aspect in the medical field. Presented research provides valuable insights for researchers and practitioners in selecting the most appropriate method for their specific ECG modeling requirements. Adjustments to control points and parameterization enable the generation of diverse ECG waveforms, enhancing the versatility of this modeling technique. This approach has the potential to extend its utility to other medical signals, presenting a promising avenue for advancing biomedical research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15606,"journal":{"name":"Journal of electrocardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of electrocardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002207362400253X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Analyzing Electrocardiogram (ECG) signals is imperative for diagnosing cardiovascular diseases. However, evaluating ECG analysis techniques faces challenges due to noise and artifacts in actual signals. Machine learning for automatic diagnosis encounters data acquisition hurdles due to medical data privacy constraints. Addressing these issues, ECG modeling assumes a crucial role in biomedical and parametric spline-based methods have garnered significant attention for their ability to accurately represent the complex temporal dynamics of ECG signals. This study conducts a comparative analysis of two parametric spline-based methods—B-spline and Hermite cubic spline—for ECG modeling, aiming to identify the most effective approach for accurate and reliable ECG representation. The Hermite cubic spline serves as one of the most effective interpolation methods, while B-spline is an approximation method. The comparative analysis includes both qualitative and quantitative evaluations. Qualitative assessment involves visually inspecting the generated spline-based models, comparing their resemblance to the original ECG signals, and employing power spectrum analysis. Quantitative analysis incorporates metrics such as root mean square error (RMSE), Percentage Root Mean Square Difference (PRD) and cross correlation, offering a more objective measure of the model's performance. Preliminary results indicate promising capabilities for both spline-based methods in representing ECG signals. However, the analysis unveils specific strengths and weaknesses for each method. The B-spline method offers greater flexibility and smoothness, while the cubic spline method demonstrates superior waveform capturing abilities with the preservation of control points, a critical aspect in the medical field. Presented research provides valuable insights for researchers and practitioners in selecting the most appropriate method for their specific ECG modeling requirements. Adjustments to control points and parameterization enable the generation of diverse ECG waveforms, enhancing the versatility of this modeling technique. This approach has the potential to extend its utility to other medical signals, presenting a promising avenue for advancing biomedical research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于参数 B 样条法和 Hermite 立方样条法的心电信号精确建模对比分析
分析心电图(ECG)信号是诊断心血管疾病的当务之急。然而,由于实际信号中存在噪声和伪影,评估心电图分析技术面临着挑战。由于医疗数据隐私的限制,用于自动诊断的机器学习遇到了数据采集方面的障碍。为解决这些问题,心电图建模在生物医学中扮演着至关重要的角色,而基于参数样条线的方法因其能够准确表示心电图信号复杂的时间动态而备受关注。本研究比较分析了两种基于参数样条线的心电图建模方法--样条线法和Hermite三次样条线法,旨在找出最有效的方法,以准确可靠地表示心电图。Hermite 立方样条曲线是最有效的插值方法之一,而 B 样条曲线则是一种近似方法。比较分析包括定性和定量评估。定性评估包括目测生成的基于样条曲线的模型,比较其与原始心电信号的相似度,以及采用功率谱分析。定量分析包括均方根误差 (RMSE)、均方根差百分比 (PRD) 和交叉相关性等指标,对模型的性能进行更客观的衡量。初步结果表明,这两种基于样条线的方法在表示心电信号方面都具有良好的性能。不过,分析揭示了每种方法的具体优缺点。B 样条法具有更大的灵活性和平滑性,而立方样条法则在保留控制点(这在医疗领域是至关重要的)的情况下展示了卓越的波形捕捉能力。本研究为研究人员和从业人员提供了宝贵的见解,帮助他们根据具体的心电图建模要求选择最合适的方法。通过调整控制点和参数化,可以生成多种多样的心电图波形,增强了这种建模技术的多功能性。这种方法有可能将其用途扩展到其他医疗信号,为推进生物医学研究提供了一条前景广阔的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of electrocardiology
Journal of electrocardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
152
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Electrocardiology is devoted exclusively to clinical and experimental studies of the electrical activities of the heart. It seeks to contribute significantly to the accuracy of diagnosis and prognosis and the effective treatment, prevention, or delay of heart disease. Editorial contents include electrocardiography, vectorcardiography, arrhythmias, membrane action potential, cardiac pacing, monitoring defibrillation, instrumentation, drug effects, and computer applications.
期刊最新文献
The de Winter electrocardiographic pattern: A systematic review of case reports. Nonparoxysmal junctional tachycardia associated with 3:2 Wenckebach exit block in the absence of digitalis therapy Study on the feasibility of distinguishing ventricular and pre-excited arrhythmia rhythms by a new algorithm The ECG of a 6-year-old girl Use of ST/HR hysteresis decreases false positive rate in exercise electrocardiography test of middle-aged asymptomatic women
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1