Remote Assessment of Eczema Severity via AI-powered Skin Image Analytics: A Systematic Review

IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Artificial Intelligence in Medicine Pub Date : 2024-08-22 DOI:10.1016/j.artmed.2024.102968
Leo Huang , Wai Hoh Tang , Rahman Attar , Claudia Gore , Hywel C. Williams , Adnan Custovic , Reiko J. Tanaka
{"title":"Remote Assessment of Eczema Severity via AI-powered Skin Image Analytics: A Systematic Review","authors":"Leo Huang ,&nbsp;Wai Hoh Tang ,&nbsp;Rahman Attar ,&nbsp;Claudia Gore ,&nbsp;Hywel C. Williams ,&nbsp;Adnan Custovic ,&nbsp;Reiko J. Tanaka","doi":"10.1016/j.artmed.2024.102968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Various studies have been published on the remote assessment of eczema severity from digital camera images. Successful deployment of an accurate and robust AI-powered tool for such purposes can aid the formulation of eczema treatment plans and assist in patient monitoring. This review aims to provide an overview of the quality of published studies on this topic and to identify challenges and suggestions to improve the robustness and reliability of existing tools. We identified 25 articles from the Scopus database that aimed to assess eczema severity automatically from digital camera images by eczema area detection (<em>n</em>=13), which is important for prior delineation of the most relevant clinical features, and/or severity prediction (<em>n</em>=12). Deep learning methods (<em>n</em>=14) were more commonly used in recent years over conventional machine learning (<em>n</em>=11). A set of 20 pre-defined criteria were used for critical appraisal in this study. Study quality was hindered in many cases due to dataset challenges, with only 28% of studies reporting patient age range and 16% reporting skin phototype range. Furthermore, 52% of studies utilised solely non-public datasets and only 17% provided open-source access to code repositories, making validation of experimental results a significant challenge. In terms of algorithm design, attempts to improve model accuracy and process automation are widely reported. However, there remains limited implementation of methods for explicitly improving model trustworthiness and robustness. There is a need for a high-quality dataset with a sufficient number of bias-free images and consistent labels, as well as improved image analytics methods, to enhance the state of remote eczema severity assessment algorithms. Improving the interpretability and explainability of developed tools will further improve long-term reliability and trustworthiness.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55458,"journal":{"name":"Artificial Intelligence in Medicine","volume":"156 ","pages":"Article 102968"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0933365724002100/pdfft?md5=6f68224a44ecdb3cc5e6bc9ec5d98ae9&pid=1-s2.0-S0933365724002100-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artificial Intelligence in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0933365724002100","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Various studies have been published on the remote assessment of eczema severity from digital camera images. Successful deployment of an accurate and robust AI-powered tool for such purposes can aid the formulation of eczema treatment plans and assist in patient monitoring. This review aims to provide an overview of the quality of published studies on this topic and to identify challenges and suggestions to improve the robustness and reliability of existing tools. We identified 25 articles from the Scopus database that aimed to assess eczema severity automatically from digital camera images by eczema area detection (n=13), which is important for prior delineation of the most relevant clinical features, and/or severity prediction (n=12). Deep learning methods (n=14) were more commonly used in recent years over conventional machine learning (n=11). A set of 20 pre-defined criteria were used for critical appraisal in this study. Study quality was hindered in many cases due to dataset challenges, with only 28% of studies reporting patient age range and 16% reporting skin phototype range. Furthermore, 52% of studies utilised solely non-public datasets and only 17% provided open-source access to code repositories, making validation of experimental results a significant challenge. In terms of algorithm design, attempts to improve model accuracy and process automation are widely reported. However, there remains limited implementation of methods for explicitly improving model trustworthiness and robustness. There is a need for a high-quality dataset with a sufficient number of bias-free images and consistent labels, as well as improved image analytics methods, to enhance the state of remote eczema severity assessment algorithms. Improving the interpretability and explainability of developed tools will further improve long-term reliability and trustworthiness.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过人工智能皮肤图像分析远程评估湿疹严重程度:系统性综述
关于通过数码相机图像远程评估湿疹严重程度的研究成果层出不穷。成功部署用于此类目的的准确、强大的人工智能工具有助于制定湿疹治疗计划,并协助对患者进行监测。本综述旨在概述已发表的有关该主题的研究质量,并找出挑战和建议,以提高现有工具的稳健性和可靠性。我们从 Scopus 数据库中找到了 25 篇文章,这些文章旨在通过湿疹区域检测(13 篇)从数码相机图像中自动评估湿疹严重程度,这对于事先划分最相关的临床特征和/或严重程度预测(12 篇)非常重要。近年来,深度学习方法(14 人)比传统机器学习方法(11 人)更常用。本研究采用了一套 20 项预定义标准进行严格评估。由于数据集方面的挑战,许多研究的质量受到了影响,只有 28% 的研究报告了患者的年龄范围,16% 的研究报告了皮肤光型范围。此外,52%的研究只使用了非公开数据集,只有17%的研究提供了代码库的开源访问权限,这使得验证实验结果成为一项重大挑战。在算法设计方面,提高模型准确性和流程自动化的尝试被广泛报道。然而,明确提高模型可信度和稳健性的方法仍然有限。我们需要高质量的数据集、足够数量的无偏差图像和一致的标签,以及改进的图像分析方法,以提高远程湿疹严重程度评估算法的水平。提高已开发工具的可解释性和可说明性将进一步提高长期可靠性和可信度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
15.00
自引率
2.70%
发文量
143
审稿时长
6.3 months
期刊介绍: Artificial Intelligence in Medicine publishes original articles from a wide variety of interdisciplinary perspectives concerning the theory and practice of artificial intelligence (AI) in medicine, medically-oriented human biology, and health care. Artificial intelligence in medicine may be characterized as the scientific discipline pertaining to research studies, projects, and applications that aim at supporting decision-based medical tasks through knowledge- and/or data-intensive computer-based solutions that ultimately support and improve the performance of a human care provider.
期刊最新文献
Hyperbolic multivariate feature learning in higher-order heterogeneous networks for drug–disease prediction Editorial Board BDFormer: Boundary-aware dual-decoder transformer for skin lesion segmentation Finger-aware Artificial Neural Network for predicting arthritis in Patients with hand pain Artificial intelligence-driven approaches in antibiotic stewardship programs and optimizing prescription practices: A systematic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1