Evaluation of synthetic clear gelatin as an acceptable surrogate for low-velocity penetrating impacts using the depth of penetration calibration standard
{"title":"Evaluation of synthetic clear gelatin as an acceptable surrogate for low-velocity penetrating impacts using the depth of penetration calibration standard","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jmbbm.2024.106710","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Ballistic gelatin has been extensively used in ballistics research for decades, but calibration standards were established on limited datasets, and only few studies have attempted to recreate these experiments with biological tissues. Recent studies have demonstrated better biofidelity with 20% <em>ordnance</em> ballistic gelatin, but researchers have discredited the use of <em>synthetic</em> gelatin claiming different behavior than ordnance gelatin. To investigate the use of synthetic clear gelatin as an acceptable surrogate of biological tissue, depth of penetration was compared between low-velocity impacts of various projectiles into porcine tissue (n = 192), post-mortem human subjects (n = 29), and Clear Ballistics synthetic gelatin (n = 39). The predicted depth of penetration of the 0.177\" steel BB (38.1 mm) was consistent with the manufacturer's calibration standard (31.75–44.45 mm) and within calibration bounds of recently proposed empirical equations. Compared to impacts in biological tissue, synthetic gelatin demonstrated the least variability in depth of penetration (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.96). Using ANCOVA, velocity was a significant covariate (p < 0.001), and there were no significant differences in normalized depth of penetration over density between porcine tissue, post-mortem human subjects, and 20% synthetic gelatin (p = 0.22). Ultimately, this study confirmed the use of 20% synthetic gelatin as an acceptable tissue simulant using standard calibration methods for use in future ballistic studies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":380,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751616124003424","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Ballistic gelatin has been extensively used in ballistics research for decades, but calibration standards were established on limited datasets, and only few studies have attempted to recreate these experiments with biological tissues. Recent studies have demonstrated better biofidelity with 20% ordnance ballistic gelatin, but researchers have discredited the use of synthetic gelatin claiming different behavior than ordnance gelatin. To investigate the use of synthetic clear gelatin as an acceptable surrogate of biological tissue, depth of penetration was compared between low-velocity impacts of various projectiles into porcine tissue (n = 192), post-mortem human subjects (n = 29), and Clear Ballistics synthetic gelatin (n = 39). The predicted depth of penetration of the 0.177" steel BB (38.1 mm) was consistent with the manufacturer's calibration standard (31.75–44.45 mm) and within calibration bounds of recently proposed empirical equations. Compared to impacts in biological tissue, synthetic gelatin demonstrated the least variability in depth of penetration (R2 = 0.96). Using ANCOVA, velocity was a significant covariate (p < 0.001), and there were no significant differences in normalized depth of penetration over density between porcine tissue, post-mortem human subjects, and 20% synthetic gelatin (p = 0.22). Ultimately, this study confirmed the use of 20% synthetic gelatin as an acceptable tissue simulant using standard calibration methods for use in future ballistic studies.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials is concerned with the mechanical deformation, damage and failure under applied forces, of biological material (at the tissue, cellular and molecular levels) and of biomaterials, i.e. those materials which are designed to mimic or replace biological materials.
The primary focus of the journal is the synthesis of materials science, biology, and medical and dental science. Reports of fundamental scientific investigations are welcome, as are articles concerned with the practical application of materials in medical devices. Both experimental and theoretical work is of interest; theoretical papers will normally include comparison of predictions with experimental data, though we recognize that this may not always be appropriate. The journal also publishes technical notes concerned with emerging experimental or theoretical techniques, letters to the editor and, by invitation, review articles and papers describing existing techniques for the benefit of an interdisciplinary readership.