Transcript analysis of uterus transplant cervical biopsies using the Banff Human Organ Transplant panel

IF 8.9 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY American Journal of Transplantation Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ajt.2024.08.027
Verena Broecker , Frederic Toulza , Mats Brännström , Angela Ernst , Candice Roufosse , Marie Carbonnel , Zeinab Alkattan , Johan Mölne
{"title":"Transcript analysis of uterus transplant cervical biopsies using the Banff Human Organ Transplant panel","authors":"Verena Broecker ,&nbsp;Frederic Toulza ,&nbsp;Mats Brännström ,&nbsp;Angela Ernst ,&nbsp;Candice Roufosse ,&nbsp;Marie Carbonnel ,&nbsp;Zeinab Alkattan ,&nbsp;Johan Mölne","doi":"10.1016/j.ajt.2024.08.027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Uterus transplantation is being more widely implemented in clinical practice. Monitoring of rejection is routinely done for cervical biopsies and is dependent on histopathological assessment, as rejections are clinically silent and nonhistological biomarkers are missing. Until this gap is filled, it is important to corroborate the histopathological diagnosis of rejection through independent methods such as gene expression analysis. In this study, we compared our previously published scoring system for grading rejection in uterus transplant cervical biopsies to the gene expression profile in the same biopsy. For this, we used the Banff Human Organ Transplant gene panel to analyze the expression of 788 genes in 75 paraffin-embedded transplant cervical biopsies with a spectrum of histologic findings, as well as in 24 cervical biopsies from healthy controls. We found that gene expression in borderline changes did not differ from normal transplants, whereas the genes with increased expression in mild rejections overlapped with previously published rejection-associated transcripts. Moderate/severe rejection samples showed a gene expression pattern characterized by a mixture of rejection-associated and tissue injury–associated genes and a decrease in epithelial transcripts. In summary, our findings support our proposed scoring system for rejection but argue against the treatment of borderline changes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":123,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Transplantation","volume":"25 2","pages":"Pages 329-342"},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1600613524005367","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Uterus transplantation is being more widely implemented in clinical practice. Monitoring of rejection is routinely done for cervical biopsies and is dependent on histopathological assessment, as rejections are clinically silent and nonhistological biomarkers are missing. Until this gap is filled, it is important to corroborate the histopathological diagnosis of rejection through independent methods such as gene expression analysis. In this study, we compared our previously published scoring system for grading rejection in uterus transplant cervical biopsies to the gene expression profile in the same biopsy. For this, we used the Banff Human Organ Transplant gene panel to analyze the expression of 788 genes in 75 paraffin-embedded transplant cervical biopsies with a spectrum of histologic findings, as well as in 24 cervical biopsies from healthy controls. We found that gene expression in borderline changes did not differ from normal transplants, whereas the genes with increased expression in mild rejections overlapped with previously published rejection-associated transcripts. Moderate/severe rejection samples showed a gene expression pattern characterized by a mixture of rejection-associated and tissue injury–associated genes and a decrease in epithelial transcripts. In summary, our findings support our proposed scoring system for rejection but argue against the treatment of borderline changes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用班夫人体器官移植面板对子宫移植宫颈活检组织进行转录分析。
子宫移植在临床实践中的应用越来越广泛。由于排斥反应在临床上并不明显,而且缺乏非组织学生物标志物,因此对排斥反应的监测通常是通过宫颈活检进行的,并依赖于组织病理学评估。在填补这一空白之前,通过基因表达分析等独立方法证实排斥反应的组织病理学诊断非常重要。在本研究中,我们将之前发表的子宫移植宫颈活检排斥反应分级评分系统与同一活检的基因表达谱进行了比较。为此,我们使用 Banff 人类器官移植基因面板分析了 75 例石蜡包埋的移植宫颈活检组织学检查结果以及 24 例健康对照组宫颈活检组织学检查结果中 788 个基因的表达情况。我们发现,边缘变化的基因表达与正常移植无异,而轻度排斥反应中表达增加的基因与以前发表的排斥反应相关转录本重叠。中度/重度排斥样本的基因表达模式表现为排斥和组织损伤相关基因的混合,上皮转录本减少。总之,我们的研究结果支持我们提出的排斥反应评分系统,但反对对边缘变化进行处理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
18.70
自引率
4.50%
发文量
346
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Transplantation is a leading journal in the field of transplantation. It serves as a forum for debate and reassessment, an agent of change, and a major platform for promoting understanding, improving results, and advancing science. Published monthly, it provides an essential resource for researchers and clinicians worldwide. The journal publishes original articles, case reports, invited reviews, letters to the editor, critical reviews, news features, consensus documents, and guidelines over 12 issues a year. It covers all major subject areas in transplantation, including thoracic (heart, lung), abdominal (kidney, liver, pancreas, islets), tissue and stem cell transplantation, organ and tissue donation and preservation, tissue injury, repair, inflammation, and aging, histocompatibility, drugs and pharmacology, graft survival, and prevention of graft dysfunction and failure. It also explores ethical and social issues in the field.
期刊最新文献
Outside Front Cover Association between out of sequence allocation and deceased donor kidney non-utilization across Organ Procurement Organizations. Longer Travel and Traffic are Associated with Adult Liver Transplant Waitlist Mortality in the United States. Breaking Barriers: Successful Outcomes of HCV D+/R- Transplants in HIV+ Recipients. Changes to MMWR: Implications for PHD and the transplant community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1