Noradrenaline dose cutoffs to characterise the severity of cardiovascular failure: Data-based development and external validation.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-30 DOI:10.1111/aas.14519
Anssi Pölkki, Pirkka T Pekkarinen, Benjamin Hess, Annika Reintam Blaser, Kaspar F Bachmann, Inès Lakbar, Steven M Hollenberg, Suzana M Lobo, Ederlon Rezende, Tuomas Selander, Matti Reinikainen
{"title":"Noradrenaline dose cutoffs to characterise the severity of cardiovascular failure: Data-based development and external validation.","authors":"Anssi Pölkki, Pirkka T Pekkarinen, Benjamin Hess, Annika Reintam Blaser, Kaspar F Bachmann, Inès Lakbar, Steven M Hollenberg, Suzana M Lobo, Ederlon Rezende, Tuomas Selander, Matti Reinikainen","doi":"10.1111/aas.14519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The vasopressor dose needed is a common measure to assess the severity of cardiovascular failure, but there is no consensus on the ranges of vasopressor doses determining different levels of cardiovascular support. We aimed to identify cutoffs for determining low, intermediate and high doses of noradrenaline (norepinephrine), the primary vasopressor used in intensive care, based on association with hospital mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a binational registry study to determine cutoffs between low, intermediate and high noradrenaline doses. We required the cutoffs to be statistically rational and practical (rounded to the first decimal and easy to remember), and to result in increasing mortality with increasing doses. The highest noradrenaline dose in the first 24 h after intensive care unit (ICU) admission was used. The cutoffs were developed using data from 8079 ICU patients treated in the ICU at Kuopio University Hospital, Finland, between 2013 and 2019. Subsequently, the cutoffs were validated in the eICU database, including 39,007 ICU admissions to 29 ICUs in the United States of America in 2014-2015. The log-rank statistic, with the Contal and O'Quigley method, was used to determine the cutoffs resulting in the most significant split between the noradrenaline dose groups with regard to hospital mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The two most prominent peaks in the log-rank statistic corresponded to noradrenaline doses 0.20 and 0.44 μg/kg/min. Accordingly, we determined three dose ranges: low (<0.2 μg/kg/min), intermediate (0.2-0.4 μg/kg/min) and high (>0.4 μg/kg/min). Mortality increased, whereas the number of patients decreased consistently with increasing noradrenaline doses in both cohorts. In the development cohort, hospital mortality was 6.5% in the group without noradrenaline administered and 14.0%, 26.4% and 40.2%, respectively, in the low-dose, intermediate-dose and high-dose groups. Compared to patients who received no noradrenaline, the hazard ratio for in-hospital death was 1.4 for the low-dose group, 4.0 for the intermediate-dose group and 7.5 for the high-dose group in the validation cohort (p < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The highest noradrenaline dose is a useful measure for quantifying circulatory failure. Cutoffs 0.2 and 0.4 μg/kg/min seem to be suitable for defining low, intermediate and high doses.</p>","PeriodicalId":6909,"journal":{"name":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","volume":" ","pages":"1400-1408"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.14519","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The vasopressor dose needed is a common measure to assess the severity of cardiovascular failure, but there is no consensus on the ranges of vasopressor doses determining different levels of cardiovascular support. We aimed to identify cutoffs for determining low, intermediate and high doses of noradrenaline (norepinephrine), the primary vasopressor used in intensive care, based on association with hospital mortality.

Methods: We conducted a binational registry study to determine cutoffs between low, intermediate and high noradrenaline doses. We required the cutoffs to be statistically rational and practical (rounded to the first decimal and easy to remember), and to result in increasing mortality with increasing doses. The highest noradrenaline dose in the first 24 h after intensive care unit (ICU) admission was used. The cutoffs were developed using data from 8079 ICU patients treated in the ICU at Kuopio University Hospital, Finland, between 2013 and 2019. Subsequently, the cutoffs were validated in the eICU database, including 39,007 ICU admissions to 29 ICUs in the United States of America in 2014-2015. The log-rank statistic, with the Contal and O'Quigley method, was used to determine the cutoffs resulting in the most significant split between the noradrenaline dose groups with regard to hospital mortality.

Results: The two most prominent peaks in the log-rank statistic corresponded to noradrenaline doses 0.20 and 0.44 μg/kg/min. Accordingly, we determined three dose ranges: low (<0.2 μg/kg/min), intermediate (0.2-0.4 μg/kg/min) and high (>0.4 μg/kg/min). Mortality increased, whereas the number of patients decreased consistently with increasing noradrenaline doses in both cohorts. In the development cohort, hospital mortality was 6.5% in the group without noradrenaline administered and 14.0%, 26.4% and 40.2%, respectively, in the low-dose, intermediate-dose and high-dose groups. Compared to patients who received no noradrenaline, the hazard ratio for in-hospital death was 1.4 for the low-dose group, 4.0 for the intermediate-dose group and 7.5 for the high-dose group in the validation cohort (p < .001).

Conclusions: The highest noradrenaline dose is a useful measure for quantifying circulatory failure. Cutoffs 0.2 and 0.4 μg/kg/min seem to be suitable for defining low, intermediate and high doses.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
描述心血管衰竭严重程度的去甲肾上腺素剂量临界值:基于数据的开发和外部验证。
背景:评估心血管功能衰竭严重程度的常用指标是所需的血管舒张剂剂量,但对于决定不同心血管支持水平的血管舒张剂剂量范围尚未达成共识。我们的目的是根据去甲肾上腺素(重症监护中使用的主要血管抑制剂)与住院死亡率的关系,确定去甲肾上腺素低、中、高剂量的临界值:我们进行了一项两国登记研究,以确定去甲肾上腺素低、中、高剂量之间的临界值。我们要求这些分界线在统计学上合理且实用(四舍五入到小数点后第一位且易于记忆),并且随着剂量的增加,死亡率也随之增加。我们采用了重症监护室(ICU)入院后 24 小时内的最高去甲肾上腺素剂量。这些临界值是根据芬兰库奥皮奥大学医院重症监护室在2013年至2019年期间收治的8079名重症监护室患者的数据制定的。随后,在 eICU 数据库中对切点进行了验证,该数据库包括 2014-2015 年美国 29 家 ICU 的 39007 名 ICU 入院患者。采用康塔尔和奥奎格利法进行对数秩统计,以确定导致去甲肾上腺素剂量组间住院死亡率最显著差异的临界值:对数-秩统计中两个最显著的峰值分别对应于0.20和0.44 μg/kg/min的去甲肾上腺素剂量。因此,我们确定了三个剂量范围:低剂量(0.4 μg/kg/min)、中剂量(0.5 μg/kg/min)和高剂量(0.5 μg/kg/min )。在两个队列中,随着去甲肾上腺素剂量的增加,死亡率增加,而患者人数则持续减少。在发展组群中,未使用去甲肾上腺素组的住院死亡率为 6.5%,而低剂量、中剂量和高剂量组的住院死亡率分别为 14.0%、26.4% 和 40.2%。与未使用去甲肾上腺素的患者相比,验证队列中低剂量组的院内死亡危险比为 1.4,中剂量组为 4.0,高剂量组为 7.5(P 结论:低剂量组、中剂量组和高剂量组的院内死亡危险比分别为 1.4、4.0 和 7.5:去甲肾上腺素最高剂量是量化循环衰竭的有效指标。0.2 和 0.4 μg/kg/min 的临界值似乎适合定义低、中和高剂量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.50%
发文量
157
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica publishes papers on original work in the fields of anaesthesiology, intensive care, pain, emergency medicine, and subjects related to their basic sciences, on condition that they are contributed exclusively to this Journal. Case reports and short communications may be considered for publication if of particular interest; also letters to the Editor, especially if related to already published material. The editorial board is free to discuss the publication of reviews on current topics, the choice of which, however, is the prerogative of the board. Every effort will be made by the Editors and selected experts to expedite a critical review of manuscripts in order to ensure rapid publication of papers of a high scientific standard.
期刊最新文献
Effect of intraoperative methadone in robot-assisted cystectomy on postoperative opioid requirements: A randomized clinical trial. Epidural analgesia versus systemic opioids for postoperative pain management after VATS: Protocol for a systematic review. Time from pain assessment to opioid treatment in the Danish emergency departments-A multicenter cohort study. Viscoelastic testing of fibrinolytic capacity in acutely infected critically ill patients: Protocol for a scoping review. Does cytochrome 2D6 genotype affect the analgesic efficacy of codeine after ambulatory surgery? Prospective trial in 987 adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1