Perceptions and Behaviors of Nurses and Physicians During Bedside Rounds in Medical-Surgical Units.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE American Journal of Critical Care Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.4037/ajcc2024308
Aishwarya Natarajan, Manuel G Venegas, Dylan Mai, Erin Dowling, Wendy Simon, Antonio M Pessegueiro, Sitaram Vangala, Anna Dermenchyan
{"title":"Perceptions and Behaviors of Nurses and Physicians During Bedside Rounds in Medical-Surgical Units.","authors":"Aishwarya Natarajan, Manuel G Venegas, Dylan Mai, Erin Dowling, Wendy Simon, Antonio M Pessegueiro, Sitaram Vangala, Anna Dermenchyan","doi":"10.4037/ajcc2024308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Communication and collaboration among health care professionals during bedside rounds improve patient outcomes and nurses' and physicians' satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine barriers to nurse-physician communication during bedside rounds and identify opportunities to improve nurse-physician collaboration at an academic medical center.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey with Likert-scale and open-ended questions regarding professional attitudes toward nurse-physician communication was administered to 220 nurses and physicians in medical-surgical units to assess perceptions of participation in bedside rounds. After the survey was given, observational data from 1007 bedside rounds were collected via a standardized data collection tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nurses and physicians perceived different barriers to including nurses in bedside rounds. Nurses most often cited being unaware that bedside rounds were occurring (38 of 46 nurses [83%]); physicians most often cited nurse unavailability (43 of 52 physicians [83%]). Of 1007 observed rounds, 602 (60%) involved in-person contact of nurses and physicians; 418 (69%) of the 602 included a conversation between the nurse and physician about the nurse's concerns. Of 355 rounds with no in-person or telephone contact between nurses and physicians, the medicine team did not contact the nurse in 284 (80%). Conversations about nurses' concerns occurred more often after physician-initiated contacts (73% of 369 contacts) and nurse-initiated contacts (74% of 93 contacts) than after chance encounters (57% of 140 contacts).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Initiating discussions of care between nurses and physicians and discussing nurses' concerns during bedside rounds have multiple benefits.</p>","PeriodicalId":7607,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Critical Care","volume":"33 5","pages":"364-372"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4037/ajcc2024308","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Communication and collaboration among health care professionals during bedside rounds improve patient outcomes and nurses' and physicians' satisfaction.

Objectives: To determine barriers to nurse-physician communication during bedside rounds and identify opportunities to improve nurse-physician collaboration at an academic medical center.

Methods: A survey with Likert-scale and open-ended questions regarding professional attitudes toward nurse-physician communication was administered to 220 nurses and physicians in medical-surgical units to assess perceptions of participation in bedside rounds. After the survey was given, observational data from 1007 bedside rounds were collected via a standardized data collection tool.

Results: Nurses and physicians perceived different barriers to including nurses in bedside rounds. Nurses most often cited being unaware that bedside rounds were occurring (38 of 46 nurses [83%]); physicians most often cited nurse unavailability (43 of 52 physicians [83%]). Of 1007 observed rounds, 602 (60%) involved in-person contact of nurses and physicians; 418 (69%) of the 602 included a conversation between the nurse and physician about the nurse's concerns. Of 355 rounds with no in-person or telephone contact between nurses and physicians, the medicine team did not contact the nurse in 284 (80%). Conversations about nurses' concerns occurred more often after physician-initiated contacts (73% of 369 contacts) and nurse-initiated contacts (74% of 93 contacts) than after chance encounters (57% of 140 contacts).

Conclusion: Initiating discussions of care between nurses and physicians and discussing nurses' concerns during bedside rounds have multiple benefits.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
内外科病房护士和医生在床边查房时的看法和行为。
背景:在床边查房过程中,医护人员之间的交流与合作可提高患者的治疗效果以及护士和医生的满意度:在床边查房期间,医护人员之间的沟通与合作可以改善患者的治疗效果,提高护士和医生的满意度:确定一家学术医疗中心在床边查房时护士与医生沟通的障碍,并找出改善护士与医生合作的机会:方法:对内科-外科病房的 220 名护士和医生进行了一项调查,调查内容包括李克特量表和开放式问题,涉及对护医沟通的专业态度,以评估他们对参与床边查房的看法。调查结束后,通过标准化数据收集工具收集了 1007 次床边查房的观察数据:结果:护士和医生认为让护士参与床边查房存在不同的障碍。护士最常提到的障碍是不知道正在进行床边查房(46 名护士中有 38 名护士[83%]);医生最常提到的障碍是护士没有时间(52 名医生中有 43 名医生[83%])。在观察到的 1007 次查房中,有 602 次(60%)涉及护士和医生的面对面接触;在这 602 次查房中,有 418 次(69%)包括护士和医生就护士关心的问题进行交谈。在 355 次护士与医生没有面对面接触或电话联系的查房中,有 284 次(80%)医疗小组没有与护士联系。与偶然相遇(140 次接触中的 57%)相比,医生主动联系护士(369 次接触中的 73%)和护士主动联系医生(93 次接触中的 74%)后就护士关注的问题进行讨论的频率更高:结论:护士与医生之间就护理问题展开讨论以及在床边查房时讨论护士关心的问题具有多重益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
103
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The editors of the American Journal of Critical Care (AJCC) invite authors to submit original manuscripts describing investigations, advances, or observations from all specialties related to the care of critically and acutely ill patients. Papers promoting collaborative practice and research are encouraged. Manuscripts will be considered on the understanding that they have not been published elsewhere and have been submitted solely to AJCC.
期刊最新文献
Association of Area Deprivation Index With Mortality in Critically Ill Adults With COVID-19. Chest Discomfort After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention. Clinical Pearls. Discussion Guide for the Wool Article. Factors Associated With Parent-Perceived Miscommunication in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1