Association of sex with in-hospital management and outcomes of patients with heart failure: Data from the REAL-HF registry

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS American heart journal Pub Date : 2024-08-27 DOI:10.1016/j.ahj.2024.08.018
Giuseppe D. Sanna MD, PhD , Gian Luca Erre MD, PhD , Matteo Cameli MD, PhD , Federico Guerra MD, PhD , Maria Concetta Pastore MD , Alessandro Marini MD , Alessandro Campora MD , Pierpaolo Gironella MD , Mario Costamagna MD , Giulia Elena Mandoli MD, PhD , Mirko Casiraghi MD , Angelo Scuteri MD, PhD , Matteo Lisi MD , Gavino Casu MD , Martino Deidda MD, PhD , Christian Cadeddu Dessalvi MD, PhD , REAL-HF investigators
{"title":"Association of sex with in-hospital management and outcomes of patients with heart failure: Data from the REAL-HF registry","authors":"Giuseppe D. Sanna MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Gian Luca Erre MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Matteo Cameli MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Federico Guerra MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Maria Concetta Pastore MD ,&nbsp;Alessandro Marini MD ,&nbsp;Alessandro Campora MD ,&nbsp;Pierpaolo Gironella MD ,&nbsp;Mario Costamagna MD ,&nbsp;Giulia Elena Mandoli MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Mirko Casiraghi MD ,&nbsp;Angelo Scuteri MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Matteo Lisi MD ,&nbsp;Gavino Casu MD ,&nbsp;Martino Deidda MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Christian Cadeddu Dessalvi MD, PhD ,&nbsp;REAL-HF investigators","doi":"10.1016/j.ahj.2024.08.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>There are sex differences in HF patients. It is not clear whether such differences mainly reflect cultural behaviours and clinical inertia, and the role of sex on clinical outcomes is still controversial. We aimed to investigate the association of sex with in-hospital management and outcomes in patients with HF.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We analyzed data of 4016 adult patients hospitalized for HF in 2020 to 2021 and enrolled in a multicentre national registry.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Women (n = 1,818 [45%]) were older than men (83 <em>vs</em> 77 years, <em>P</em> &lt; .0001), with a higher prevalence of arterial hypertension (73% <em>vs</em> 69%, <em>P</em> = .011) and atrial fibrillation. Women presented more frequently with HF and preserved ejection fraction -HFpEF (55% <em>vs</em> 32%, <em>P</em> &lt; .001). They were more often hospitalized in internal medicine departments (71% <em>vs</em> 51%), and men in highly specialized cardiology units (49% <em>vs</em> 29%). When considering HF pharmacological treatments at discharge in the subgroup with reduced ejection fraction -HFrEF (n=1525), there were no significant differences (49% of women treated with GDMT [guideline-directed medical therapy] <em>vs</em> 52% of men, <em>P</em> = .197). Sex was not associated either with hospital readmissions (30-days OR [95% CI] = 0.89 [0.71-1.11], <em>P</em> = .304; 1-year OR [95% CI] = 1.02[0.88-1.19], <em>P</em> = .777) or with mortality (in-hospital OR [95% CI] = 1.14 [0.73-1.78], <em>P</em> = .558; 1-year OR [95% CI] = 1.08 [0.87-1.33], <em>P</em> = .478). Similar results were obtained when considering different HF categories based on left ventricular ejection fraction.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Women and men exhibited distinct clinical profiles. Although this may have had an impact on hospital pathways (noncardiology/cardiology units) and pharmacological prescriptions, sex <em>per se</em> did not appear as an independent determinant of clinical choices. Moreover, when considering homogeneous groups, women were not undertreated. Finally, female sex was not associated with worse clinical outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7868,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal","volume":"278 ","pages":"Pages 72-82"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American heart journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002870324002217","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

There are sex differences in HF patients. It is not clear whether such differences mainly reflect cultural behaviours and clinical inertia, and the role of sex on clinical outcomes is still controversial. We aimed to investigate the association of sex with in-hospital management and outcomes in patients with HF.

Methods

We analyzed data of 4016 adult patients hospitalized for HF in 2020 to 2021 and enrolled in a multicentre national registry.

Results

Women (n = 1,818 [45%]) were older than men (83 vs 77 years, P < .0001), with a higher prevalence of arterial hypertension (73% vs 69%, P = .011) and atrial fibrillation. Women presented more frequently with HF and preserved ejection fraction -HFpEF (55% vs 32%, P < .001). They were more often hospitalized in internal medicine departments (71% vs 51%), and men in highly specialized cardiology units (49% vs 29%). When considering HF pharmacological treatments at discharge in the subgroup with reduced ejection fraction -HFrEF (n=1525), there were no significant differences (49% of women treated with GDMT [guideline-directed medical therapy] vs 52% of men, P = .197). Sex was not associated either with hospital readmissions (30-days OR [95% CI] = 0.89 [0.71-1.11], P = .304; 1-year OR [95% CI] = 1.02[0.88-1.19], P = .777) or with mortality (in-hospital OR [95% CI] = 1.14 [0.73-1.78], P = .558; 1-year OR [95% CI] = 1.08 [0.87-1.33], P = .478). Similar results were obtained when considering different HF categories based on left ventricular ejection fraction.

Conclusions

Women and men exhibited distinct clinical profiles. Although this may have had an impact on hospital pathways (noncardiology/cardiology units) and pharmacological prescriptions, sex per se did not appear as an independent determinant of clinical choices. Moreover, when considering homogeneous groups, women were not undertreated. Finally, female sex was not associated with worse clinical outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
性别与心力衰竭患者的院内管理和预后的关系:来自 REAL-HF 登记处的数据:性别对心力衰竭住院患者的影响。
背景:高血压患者存在性别差异。目前尚不清楚这种差异是否主要反映了文化行为和临床惰性,性别对临床结果的作用仍存在争议。我们旨在研究性别与高血压患者院内管理和预后的关系:我们分析了 2020-2021 年期间因高血压住院的 4016 名成年患者的数据,这些患者均登记在一个多中心国家登记处:结果:女性(n=1818[45%])比男性年长(83vs77岁,p结论:女性和男性表现出不同的临床特征:女性和男性表现出不同的临床特征。虽然这可能会对医院路径(非心脏病科/心脏病科)和药物处方产生影响,但性别本身似乎并不是临床选择的独立决定因素。此外,在考虑同质群体时,女性的治疗并没有减少。最后,女性性别与较差的临床结果无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American heart journal
American heart journal 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
2.10%
发文量
214
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The American Heart Journal will consider for publication suitable articles on topics pertaining to the broad discipline of cardiovascular disease. Our goal is to provide the reader primary investigation, scholarly review, and opinion concerning the practice of cardiovascular medicine. We especially encourage submission of 3 types of reports that are not frequently seen in cardiovascular journals: negative clinical studies, reports on study designs, and studies involving the organization of medical care. The Journal does not accept individual case reports or original articles involving bench laboratory or animal research.
期刊最新文献
Prognosis of patients with non-specific electrocardiogram findings in a Tanzanian Emergency Department. Effect of apixaban versus vitamin K antagonist and aspirin versus placebo on days alive and out of hospital: An analysis from AUGUSTUS. Chest pain and coronary artery disease in cardiac amyloidosis: Prevalence, mechanisms, and clinical implications. Changes in coverage, access, and health status among adults with cardiovascular disease after medicaid work requirements. Impact of Moderate or Severe Mitral and Tricuspid Valves Regurgitation after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1