Giuseppe D. Sanna MD, PhD , Gian Luca Erre MD, PhD , Matteo Cameli MD, PhD , Federico Guerra MD, PhD , Maria Concetta Pastore MD , Alessandro Marini MD , Alessandro Campora MD , Pierpaolo Gironella MD , Mario Costamagna MD , Giulia Elena Mandoli MD, PhD , Mirko Casiraghi MD , Angelo Scuteri MD, PhD , Matteo Lisi MD , Gavino Casu MD , Martino Deidda MD, PhD , Christian Cadeddu Dessalvi MD, PhD , REAL-HF investigators
{"title":"Association of sex with in-hospital management and outcomes of patients with heart failure: Data from the REAL-HF registry","authors":"Giuseppe D. Sanna MD, PhD , Gian Luca Erre MD, PhD , Matteo Cameli MD, PhD , Federico Guerra MD, PhD , Maria Concetta Pastore MD , Alessandro Marini MD , Alessandro Campora MD , Pierpaolo Gironella MD , Mario Costamagna MD , Giulia Elena Mandoli MD, PhD , Mirko Casiraghi MD , Angelo Scuteri MD, PhD , Matteo Lisi MD , Gavino Casu MD , Martino Deidda MD, PhD , Christian Cadeddu Dessalvi MD, PhD , REAL-HF investigators","doi":"10.1016/j.ahj.2024.08.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>There are sex differences in HF patients. It is not clear whether such differences mainly reflect cultural behaviours and clinical inertia, and the role of sex on clinical outcomes is still controversial. We aimed to investigate the association of sex with in-hospital management and outcomes in patients with HF.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We analyzed data of 4016 adult patients hospitalized for HF in 2020 to 2021 and enrolled in a multicentre national registry.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Women (n = 1,818 [45%]) were older than men (83 <em>vs</em> 77 years, <em>P</em> < .0001), with a higher prevalence of arterial hypertension (73% <em>vs</em> 69%, <em>P</em> = .011) and atrial fibrillation. Women presented more frequently with HF and preserved ejection fraction -HFpEF (55% <em>vs</em> 32%, <em>P</em> < .001). They were more often hospitalized in internal medicine departments (71% <em>vs</em> 51%), and men in highly specialized cardiology units (49% <em>vs</em> 29%). When considering HF pharmacological treatments at discharge in the subgroup with reduced ejection fraction -HFrEF (n=1525), there were no significant differences (49% of women treated with GDMT [guideline-directed medical therapy] <em>vs</em> 52% of men, <em>P</em> = .197). Sex was not associated either with hospital readmissions (30-days OR [95% CI] = 0.89 [0.71-1.11], <em>P</em> = .304; 1-year OR [95% CI] = 1.02[0.88-1.19], <em>P</em> = .777) or with mortality (in-hospital OR [95% CI] = 1.14 [0.73-1.78], <em>P</em> = .558; 1-year OR [95% CI] = 1.08 [0.87-1.33], <em>P</em> = .478). Similar results were obtained when considering different HF categories based on left ventricular ejection fraction.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Women and men exhibited distinct clinical profiles. Although this may have had an impact on hospital pathways (noncardiology/cardiology units) and pharmacological prescriptions, sex <em>per se</em> did not appear as an independent determinant of clinical choices. Moreover, when considering homogeneous groups, women were not undertreated. Finally, female sex was not associated with worse clinical outcomes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7868,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal","volume":"278 ","pages":"Pages 72-82"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American heart journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0002870324002217","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
There are sex differences in HF patients. It is not clear whether such differences mainly reflect cultural behaviours and clinical inertia, and the role of sex on clinical outcomes is still controversial. We aimed to investigate the association of sex with in-hospital management and outcomes in patients with HF.
Methods
We analyzed data of 4016 adult patients hospitalized for HF in 2020 to 2021 and enrolled in a multicentre national registry.
Results
Women (n = 1,818 [45%]) were older than men (83 vs 77 years, P < .0001), with a higher prevalence of arterial hypertension (73% vs 69%, P = .011) and atrial fibrillation. Women presented more frequently with HF and preserved ejection fraction -HFpEF (55% vs 32%, P < .001). They were more often hospitalized in internal medicine departments (71% vs 51%), and men in highly specialized cardiology units (49% vs 29%). When considering HF pharmacological treatments at discharge in the subgroup with reduced ejection fraction -HFrEF (n=1525), there were no significant differences (49% of women treated with GDMT [guideline-directed medical therapy] vs 52% of men, P = .197). Sex was not associated either with hospital readmissions (30-days OR [95% CI] = 0.89 [0.71-1.11], P = .304; 1-year OR [95% CI] = 1.02[0.88-1.19], P = .777) or with mortality (in-hospital OR [95% CI] = 1.14 [0.73-1.78], P = .558; 1-year OR [95% CI] = 1.08 [0.87-1.33], P = .478). Similar results were obtained when considering different HF categories based on left ventricular ejection fraction.
Conclusions
Women and men exhibited distinct clinical profiles. Although this may have had an impact on hospital pathways (noncardiology/cardiology units) and pharmacological prescriptions, sex per se did not appear as an independent determinant of clinical choices. Moreover, when considering homogeneous groups, women were not undertreated. Finally, female sex was not associated with worse clinical outcomes.
期刊介绍:
The American Heart Journal will consider for publication suitable articles on topics pertaining to the broad discipline of cardiovascular disease. Our goal is to provide the reader primary investigation, scholarly review, and opinion concerning the practice of cardiovascular medicine. We especially encourage submission of 3 types of reports that are not frequently seen in cardiovascular journals: negative clinical studies, reports on study designs, and studies involving the organization of medical care. The Journal does not accept individual case reports or original articles involving bench laboratory or animal research.