Spontaneous breathing trial in the weaning process from mechanical ventilation in pediatrics: outcome and predictive factors.

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 PEDIATRICS Archivos argentinos de pediatria Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-05 DOI:10.5546/aap.2024-10399.eng
Pedro Taffarel, Jorge Palmeiro, Yamila Nociti, Verónica Laulhé, Laura Giménez, Laura Lamberti, Marina Erviti, Juliana Fassola, Lourdes Lisciotto, Soledad López Cottet, Mónica Dos Santos, Paula Doi, Claudia Meregalli, Facundo Jorro Barón
{"title":"Spontaneous breathing trial in the weaning process from mechanical ventilation in pediatrics: outcome and predictive factors.","authors":"Pedro Taffarel, Jorge Palmeiro, Yamila Nociti, Verónica Laulhé, Laura Giménez, Laura Lamberti, Marina Erviti, Juliana Fassola, Lourdes Lisciotto, Soledad López Cottet, Mónica Dos Santos, Paula Doi, Claudia Meregalli, Facundo Jorro Barón","doi":"10.5546/aap.2024-10399.eng","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction. spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) in weaning from pediatric invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) is an endorsed practice, its positivity is based on clinical parameters; however, its results could be better documented. Objective. To describe the results of the SBT in the IMV weaning process. Population and methods. Retrospective analysis. Patients with ≥48 h in IMV from March 1, 2022 to January 31, 2024. Results. A total of493 SBT were analyzed in 304 patients; 71% (348) were positive, and 87% (302) resulted in successful extubations. The causes of negative SBT were increased work of breathing (70%), respiratory rate (57%), and heart rate (27%). In univariate analysis, respiratory distress as the reason for admission, peak inspiratory pressure before SBT and T-tube use, were predictors of negative SBT. In multivariate analysis, this association persisted for admission for respiratory cause, the higher programmed respiratory rate in IMV, as the T-tube modality. Those with negative SBT stayed more days in IMV (9 [7-12] vs. 7 [4-10]) and in PICU (11 [9-15] vs. 9 [7-12]). Conclusion. Positive SBT predicted successful extubation in a high percentage of cases. Respiratory distress on admission, higher programmed respiratory rate, and a higher proportion of T-tube mode were negative predictors of the test. Negative SBT was associated with more extended stays in IMV and PICU.</p>","PeriodicalId":8338,"journal":{"name":"Archivos argentinos de pediatria","volume":" ","pages":"e202410399"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivos argentinos de pediatria","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5546/aap.2024-10399.eng","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) in weaning from pediatric invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) is an endorsed practice, its positivity is based on clinical parameters; however, its results could be better documented. Objective. To describe the results of the SBT in the IMV weaning process. Population and methods. Retrospective analysis. Patients with ≥48 h in IMV from March 1, 2022 to January 31, 2024. Results. A total of493 SBT were analyzed in 304 patients; 71% (348) were positive, and 87% (302) resulted in successful extubations. The causes of negative SBT were increased work of breathing (70%), respiratory rate (57%), and heart rate (27%). In univariate analysis, respiratory distress as the reason for admission, peak inspiratory pressure before SBT and T-tube use, were predictors of negative SBT. In multivariate analysis, this association persisted for admission for respiratory cause, the higher programmed respiratory rate in IMV, as the T-tube modality. Those with negative SBT stayed more days in IMV (9 [7-12] vs. 7 [4-10]) and in PICU (11 [9-15] vs. 9 [7-12]). Conclusion. Positive SBT predicted successful extubation in a high percentage of cases. Respiratory distress on admission, higher programmed respiratory rate, and a higher proportion of T-tube mode were negative predictors of the test. Negative SBT was associated with more extended stays in IMV and PICU.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿科机械通气断奶过程中的自主呼吸试验:结果和预测因素。
导言:在小儿有创机械通气(IMV)断奶过程中进行自主呼吸试验(SBT)是一种公认的做法,其积极性基于临床参数;然而,其结果还需要更好的记录。目的描述在 IMV 断流过程中进行 SBT 的结果。人群和方法。回顾性分析。2022 年 3 月 1 日至 2024 年 1 月 31 日期间接受 IMV 治疗≥48 小时的患者。结果。共分析了 304 名患者的 493 次 SBT;71%(348 例)为阳性,87%(302 例)成功拔管。导致 SBT 阴性的原因是呼吸功增加(70%)、呼吸频率增加(57%)和心率增加(27%)。在单变量分析中,入院原因中的呼吸窘迫、SBT 前的吸气峰值压力和 T 型管的使用是预测 SBT 阴性的因素。在多变量分析中,因呼吸困难入院、IMV程序性呼吸频率越高以及使用 T 型管等因素都与 SBT 阴性有关。SBT 阴性患者在综合监护病房(9 [7-12] 对 7 [4-10])和重症监护病房(11 [9-15] 对 9 [7-12])的住院天数较多。结论。SBT 阳性预示成功拔管的比例很高。入院时的呼吸困难、较高的程序化呼吸频率和较高比例的 T 型管模式是该测试的阴性预测因素。SBT 阴性与在 IMV 和 PICU 的住院时间更长有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
25.00%
发文量
286
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Archivos Argentinos de Pediatría is the official publication of the Sociedad Argentina de Pediatría (SAP) and has been published without interruption since 1930. Its publication is bimonthly. Archivos Argentinos de Pediatría publishes articles related to perinatal, child and adolescent health and other relevant disciplines for the medical profession.
期刊最新文献
Fiber in enteral nutrition: why and what for? [Recommendations on the use of palivizumab: update 2023]. Liver transplantation for primary liver tumors in pediatrics. A case series. The diagnosis of short lingual frenulum and how to promote breastfeeding. The lingual frenulum, ankyloglossia, and breastfeeding.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1