Distinct impulsivity profiles in subtypes of violence among community-dwelling patients with severe mental disorders: a longitudinal study.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY BMC Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-08-30 DOI:10.1186/s12888-024-06044-z
Qi-Kai Wang, Qin Yang, Cheng-Xian Li, Yu-Feng Qiu, Xiao-Tong Yin, Jun-Mei Hu, Qin-Ting Zhang, Xia-Can Chen
{"title":"Distinct impulsivity profiles in subtypes of violence among community-dwelling patients with severe mental disorders: a longitudinal study.","authors":"Qi-Kai Wang, Qin Yang, Cheng-Xian Li, Yu-Feng Qiu, Xiao-Tong Yin, Jun-Mei Hu, Qin-Ting Zhang, Xia-Can Chen","doi":"10.1186/s12888-024-06044-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Although only a few patients with severe mental disorders (SMD) can commit violent behaviour in the community, violent behaviour aggravates the stigma towards patients with SMD. Understanding the subtypes of violent behaviour may be beneficial for preventing violent behaviour among patients with SMD, but it has rarely been studied.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This longitudinal study investigated 1914 patients with SMD in the community at baseline, and the follow-up period ranged from February 2021 to August 2021. The Barratt Impulsiveness Scale Version-11, the Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire, the Impulsive/Premeditated Aggression Scale, the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire and the MacArthur Community Violence Instrument were used at baseline. The Modified Overt Aggression Scale was used to assess the occurrence of violent behaviour (outcome) during the follow-up period. Cox regression models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Latent class analysis was used to characterise the subtypes of patients with SMD who engaged in violent behaviour at follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that 7.2% of patients with SMD presented violent behaviour within six months in the community. Younger age (OR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.96-1.00, p = 0.016) and no economic source (OR = 1.60, 95% CI = 1.10-2.33, p = 0.014) were risk factors for violent behaviour. Patients with SMD who engaged in violent behaviour could be classified into three subtypes: one class characterised by a history of violence and impulsivity, another class characterised by high levels of aggression and motor impulsivity, and the last class characterised by median cognitive impulsivity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Socio-demographic factors were risk factors for violent behaviour among patients with SMD, which could eliminate the discrimination toward this group. Impulsivity played a vital role in identifying the three subtypes of patients with SMD who engaged in violent behaviour. These findings may be helpful for the development of a personalised violence risk management plan for patients with SMD who commit violent behaviour in the community.</p>","PeriodicalId":9029,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11365173/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-024-06044-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Although only a few patients with severe mental disorders (SMD) can commit violent behaviour in the community, violent behaviour aggravates the stigma towards patients with SMD. Understanding the subtypes of violent behaviour may be beneficial for preventing violent behaviour among patients with SMD, but it has rarely been studied.

Methods: This longitudinal study investigated 1914 patients with SMD in the community at baseline, and the follow-up period ranged from February 2021 to August 2021. The Barratt Impulsiveness Scale Version-11, the Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire, the Impulsive/Premeditated Aggression Scale, the Personality Diagnostic Questionnaire and the MacArthur Community Violence Instrument were used at baseline. The Modified Overt Aggression Scale was used to assess the occurrence of violent behaviour (outcome) during the follow-up period. Cox regression models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Latent class analysis was used to characterise the subtypes of patients with SMD who engaged in violent behaviour at follow-up.

Results: We found that 7.2% of patients with SMD presented violent behaviour within six months in the community. Younger age (OR = 0.98, 95% CI = 0.96-1.00, p = 0.016) and no economic source (OR = 1.60, 95% CI = 1.10-2.33, p = 0.014) were risk factors for violent behaviour. Patients with SMD who engaged in violent behaviour could be classified into three subtypes: one class characterised by a history of violence and impulsivity, another class characterised by high levels of aggression and motor impulsivity, and the last class characterised by median cognitive impulsivity.

Conclusions: Socio-demographic factors were risk factors for violent behaviour among patients with SMD, which could eliminate the discrimination toward this group. Impulsivity played a vital role in identifying the three subtypes of patients with SMD who engaged in violent behaviour. These findings may be helpful for the development of a personalised violence risk management plan for patients with SMD who commit violent behaviour in the community.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
居住在社区的严重精神障碍患者在暴力亚型中的不同冲动特征:一项纵向研究。
背景:虽然只有少数严重精神障碍(SMD)患者会在社区中实施暴力行为,但暴力行为会加重人们对严重精神障碍患者的偏见。了解暴力行为的亚型可能有利于预防严重精神障碍患者的暴力行为,但这方面的研究却很少:这项纵向研究对1914名社区SMD患者进行了基线调查,随访期为2021年2月至2021年8月。基线时使用了巴拉特冲动量表第 11 版、布斯-佩里攻击行为问卷、冲动/预谋攻击行为量表、人格诊断问卷和麦克阿瑟社区暴力问卷。改良过度攻击量表用于评估随访期间暴力行为(结果)的发生情况。采用 Cox 回归模型计算危险比 (HRs),并得出 95% 的置信区间 (CIs)。我们使用潜类分析来描述在随访期间有暴力行为的 SMD 患者的亚型:我们发现,7.2%的SMD患者在社区的六个月内有暴力行为。年轻(OR = 0.98,95% CI = 0.96-1.00,p = 0.016)和无经济来源(OR = 1.60,95% CI = 1.10-2.33,p = 0.014)是暴力行为的风险因素。有暴力行为的 SMD 患者可分为三个亚型:一类以暴力史和冲动性为特征,另一类以高度攻击性和运动冲动性为特征,最后一类以中度认知冲动性为特征:社会人口因素是 SMD 患者暴力行为的风险因素,这可以消除对这一群体的歧视。冲动性在识别有暴力行为的三个亚型 SMD 患者中起着至关重要的作用。这些发现可能有助于为在社区中实施暴力行为的SMD患者制定个性化的暴力风险管理计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Psychiatry
BMC Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
716
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychiatry is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of psychiatric disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Characteristics of Japanese teenage suicide attempters: a retrospective study comparing suicide attempters with young adults. Developing and testing Advance Choice Document implementation resources for Black African and Caribbean people with experience of compulsory psychiatric admission. Differential association between childhood trauma subtypes and neurocognitive performance in adults with major depression. Experiences of undergoing internet-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy for climate change-related distress: a qualitative study. Gender differences and mental distress during COVID-19: a cross-sectional study in Japan.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1