Perspectives of older adults with chronic illness on person-centered practice at an inpatient hospital department: a descriptive study.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY BMC Geriatrics Pub Date : 2024-08-29 DOI:10.1186/s12877-024-05261-1
Diana Vareta, Filipa Ventura, Carlos Família, Célia Oliveira
{"title":"Perspectives of older adults with chronic illness on person-centered practice at an inpatient hospital department: a descriptive study.","authors":"Diana Vareta, Filipa Ventura, Carlos Família, Célia Oliveira","doi":"10.1186/s12877-024-05261-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The growing aging trend associated with a higher prevalence of chronic illnesses is increasing the demand for the development of person-centered practice in specific care settings. Knowing the person's perception of the care and the care experience is essential to improving inpatient care toward person-centeredness. This study aims to characterize the perceptions of person-centered practice of hospitalized older adults with chronic illness at a Portuguese inpatient hospital department.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A quantitative, descriptive, cross-sectional approach was followed. Data were collected using a sociodemographic and health history questionnaire and the Person-Centered Practice Inventory - Care (PCPI-C). The effect of the different variables on each PCPI-C construct was determined using analysis of variance (ANOVA).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results show that person-centered practice was positively perceived in the five constructs of the person-centered processes domain (M = 3.92; SD = 0.47). The highest-scored construct was working with the person's beliefs and values (M = 4.12; SD = 0.51), and the lowest was working holistically (M = 3.68; SD = 0.70). No significant effect of the independent variables was found to influence the perceptions of any of the constructs in the person-centered processes domain.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These results might indicate that person-centered processes are perceived uniquely by each person through individualized therapeutic relationships rather than a pattern of care shared by hospitalized older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":9056,"journal":{"name":"BMC Geriatrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11360336/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-05261-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The growing aging trend associated with a higher prevalence of chronic illnesses is increasing the demand for the development of person-centered practice in specific care settings. Knowing the person's perception of the care and the care experience is essential to improving inpatient care toward person-centeredness. This study aims to characterize the perceptions of person-centered practice of hospitalized older adults with chronic illness at a Portuguese inpatient hospital department.

Methods: A quantitative, descriptive, cross-sectional approach was followed. Data were collected using a sociodemographic and health history questionnaire and the Person-Centered Practice Inventory - Care (PCPI-C). The effect of the different variables on each PCPI-C construct was determined using analysis of variance (ANOVA).

Results: The results show that person-centered practice was positively perceived in the five constructs of the person-centered processes domain (M = 3.92; SD = 0.47). The highest-scored construct was working with the person's beliefs and values (M = 4.12; SD = 0.51), and the lowest was working holistically (M = 3.68; SD = 0.70). No significant effect of the independent variables was found to influence the perceptions of any of the constructs in the person-centered processes domain.

Conclusions: These results might indicate that person-centered processes are perceived uniquely by each person through individualized therapeutic relationships rather than a pattern of care shared by hospitalized older adults.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
患有慢性病的老年人对医院住院部以人为本的做法的看法:一项描述性研究。
背景:随着老龄化趋势的加剧以及慢性病患病率的上升,在特定护理环境中发展以人为本的护理实践的需求日益增加。了解患者对护理和护理体验的感知对于改善住院护理,实现以人为本至关重要。本研究旨在了解葡萄牙一家医院住院部的慢性病住院老年人对以人为本实践的看法:方法:采用定量、描述性、横断面方法。采用社会人口学和健康史问卷以及以人为本的护理实践量表(PCPI-C)收集数据。采用方差分析(ANOVA)确定了不同变量对 PCPI-C 各构点的影响:结果表明,以人为本的实践在以人为本的过程领域的五个构念中都得到了积极评价(M = 3.92; SD = 0.47)。得分最高的构念是与个人的信念和价值观合作(M = 4.12;SD = 0.51),得分最低的是全面合作(M = 3.68;SD = 0.70)。在以人为本的过程领域中,没有发现自变量对任何构念的认知有明显影响:这些结果可能表明,以人为本的过程是每个人通过个性化的治疗关系独特地感知到的,而不是住院老年人共有的护理模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Geriatrics
BMC Geriatrics GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
873
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Geriatrics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the health and healthcare of older people, including the effects of healthcare systems and policies. The journal also welcomes research focused on the aging process, including cellular, genetic, and physiological processes and cognitive modifications.
期刊最新文献
Association between healthy lifestyle and frailty in adults and mediating role of weight-adjusted waist index: results from NHANES Determinants of received care time among Finnish home care clients and assisted living facility residents: a time-motion study Effects of graphene far-infrared and social network interventions on depression, anxiety and dementia in older adults Cross-sectional association between high-sensitivity C-reactive protein and cognitive function in community-dwelling older adults: the SONIC study Creatinine-to-cystatin C ratio and frailty in older adults: a longitudinal cohort study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1