Predicting informal dementia caregivers' desire to institutionalize through mining data from an eHealth platform.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY BMC Geriatrics Pub Date : 2024-08-30 DOI:10.1186/s12877-024-05128-5
Soraia Teles, João Viana, Alberto Freitas, Óscar Ribeiro, Sara Alves, Ana Ferreira, Constança Paúl
{"title":"Predicting informal dementia caregivers' desire to institutionalize through mining data from an eHealth platform.","authors":"Soraia Teles, João Viana, Alberto Freitas, Óscar Ribeiro, Sara Alves, Ana Ferreira, Constança Paúl","doi":"10.1186/s12877-024-05128-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dementia is a leading factor in the institutionalization of older adults. Informal caregivers' desire to institutionalize (DI) their care recipient with dementia (PwD) is a primary predictor of institutionalization. This study aims to develop a prediction model for caregivers' DI by mining data from an eHealth platform in a high-prevalence dementia country.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Cross-sectional data were collected from caregivers registering on isupport-portugal.pt. One hundred and four caregivers completed the Desire to Institutionalize Scale (DIS) and were grouped into DI (DIS score ≥ 1) and no DI (DIS score = 0). Participants completed a comprehensive set of sociodemographic, clinical, and psychosocial measures, pertaining to the caregiver and the PwD, which were accounted as model predictors. The selected model was a classification tree, enabling the visualization of rules for predictions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Caregivers, mostly female (82.5%), offspring of the PwD (70.2), employed (65.4%), and highly educated (M 15 years of schooling), provided intensive care (Mdn 24 h. week) over a median course of 2.8 years. Two-thirds (66.3%) endorsed at least one item on the DIS (DI group). The model, with caregivers' perceived stress as the root of the classification tree (split at 28.5 points on the Zarit Burden Interview) and including the ages of caregivers and PwD (split at 46 and 88 years, respectively), as well as cohabitation, employed five rules to predict DI. Caregivers scoring 28.5 and above on burden and caring for PwD under 88 are more prone to DI than those caring for older PwD (rules 1-2), suggesting the influence of expectations on caregiving duration. The model demonstrated high accuracy (0.83, 95%CI 0.75, 0.89), sensitivity (0.88, 95%CI 0.81, 0.95), and good specificity (0.71, 95%CI 0.56, 0.86).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study distilled a comprehensive range of modifiable and non-modifiable variables into a simplified, interpretable, and accurate model, particularly useful at identifying caregivers with actual DI. Considering the nature of variables within the prediction rules, this model holds promise for application to other existing datasets and as a proxy for actual institutionalization. Predicting the institutional placement of PwD is crucial for intervening on modifiable factors as caregiver burden, and for care planning and financing.</p>","PeriodicalId":9056,"journal":{"name":"BMC Geriatrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11363529/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Geriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-05128-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Dementia is a leading factor in the institutionalization of older adults. Informal caregivers' desire to institutionalize (DI) their care recipient with dementia (PwD) is a primary predictor of institutionalization. This study aims to develop a prediction model for caregivers' DI by mining data from an eHealth platform in a high-prevalence dementia country.

Methods: Cross-sectional data were collected from caregivers registering on isupport-portugal.pt. One hundred and four caregivers completed the Desire to Institutionalize Scale (DIS) and were grouped into DI (DIS score ≥ 1) and no DI (DIS score = 0). Participants completed a comprehensive set of sociodemographic, clinical, and psychosocial measures, pertaining to the caregiver and the PwD, which were accounted as model predictors. The selected model was a classification tree, enabling the visualization of rules for predictions.

Results: Caregivers, mostly female (82.5%), offspring of the PwD (70.2), employed (65.4%), and highly educated (M 15 years of schooling), provided intensive care (Mdn 24 h. week) over a median course of 2.8 years. Two-thirds (66.3%) endorsed at least one item on the DIS (DI group). The model, with caregivers' perceived stress as the root of the classification tree (split at 28.5 points on the Zarit Burden Interview) and including the ages of caregivers and PwD (split at 46 and 88 years, respectively), as well as cohabitation, employed five rules to predict DI. Caregivers scoring 28.5 and above on burden and caring for PwD under 88 are more prone to DI than those caring for older PwD (rules 1-2), suggesting the influence of expectations on caregiving duration. The model demonstrated high accuracy (0.83, 95%CI 0.75, 0.89), sensitivity (0.88, 95%CI 0.81, 0.95), and good specificity (0.71, 95%CI 0.56, 0.86).

Conclusions: This study distilled a comprehensive range of modifiable and non-modifiable variables into a simplified, interpretable, and accurate model, particularly useful at identifying caregivers with actual DI. Considering the nature of variables within the prediction rules, this model holds promise for application to other existing datasets and as a proxy for actual institutionalization. Predicting the institutional placement of PwD is crucial for intervening on modifiable factors as caregiver burden, and for care planning and financing.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过挖掘电子健康平台的数据,预测痴呆症非正规护理人员机构化的意愿。
背景:痴呆症是导致老年人入住养老院的一个主要因素。非正规照护者希望将患有痴呆症的受照护者送入养老院(DI)是预测送入养老院的主要因素。本研究旨在通过挖掘一个痴呆症高发国家电子健康平台的数据,建立一个护理人员入院意愿的预测模型:方法:从在 isupport-portugal.pt 上注册的护理人员处收集横向数据。14 名护理人员完成了 "希望机构化量表"(DIS),并被分为有机构化意愿(DIS 得分≥ 1)和无机构化意愿(DIS 得分= 0)两组。参与者完成了一整套与照顾者和残疾人相关的社会人口学、临床和社会心理测量,并将其作为模型预测因子。所选模型是一棵分类树,可实现预测规则的可视化:护理者大多为女性(82.5%),是残疾人的后代(70.2%),有工作(65.4%),受过高等教育(M 15 年学校教育),在中位数 2.8 年的过程中提供了密集护理(Mdn 24 小时/周)。三分之二(66.3%)的护理人员(DI 组)认可 DIS 中的至少一个项目。该模型以护理人员的压力感知为分类树的根基(在 Zarit 负担访谈中分为 28.5 分),包括护理人员和残疾人的年龄(分别为 46 岁和 88 岁)以及同居情况,采用五种规则来预测 DI。负担得分在 28.5 分及以上且照顾 88 岁以下残疾人的照顾者比照顾年龄较大的残疾人的照顾者更容易出现 DI(规则 1-2),这表明预期对照顾时间的影响。该模型具有较高的准确性(0.83,95%CI 0.75,0.89)、灵敏度(0.88,95%CI 0.81,0.95)和良好的特异性(0.71,95%CI 0.56,0.86):这项研究将一系列可改变和不可改变的变量提炼成一个简化、可解释且准确的模型,尤其适用于识别实际存在 DI 的护理人员。考虑到预测规则中变量的性质,该模型有望应用于其他现有数据集,并作为实际机构安置的替代指标。预测残疾人的机构安置对于干预可改变的因素(如照顾者的负担)以及护理规划和融资至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Geriatrics
BMC Geriatrics GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
873
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Geriatrics is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in all aspects of the health and healthcare of older people, including the effects of healthcare systems and policies. The journal also welcomes research focused on the aging process, including cellular, genetic, and physiological processes and cognitive modifications.
期刊最新文献
Factors associated with the occupational balance in caregivers of people with dementia: A cross-sectional study from the ATENEA project. Mazor X robot-assisted upper and lower cervical pedicle screw fixation: a case report and literature review. Sociodemographic and health disparities in self-care difficulties among older individuals: Evidence from South Africa. Association of cognitive performance with overall, dosage, intensity, and domain physical activity in aging: NHANES 2011-2014. Validity and reliability of the TechPH scale in assessing Iranian older adults' attitudes toward technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1