Improving uptake of colorectal cancer screening by complex patients at an academic primary care practice: a feasibility study.

IF 1.3 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMJ Open Quality Pub Date : 2024-08-28 DOI:10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002844
Charlotte Desponds, Cyril Ducros, Carine Rochat, Laure Galassini, Patrick Bodenmann, Veronique S Grazioli, Ekaterina Plys, Christian von Plessen, Alexandre Gouveia, Kevin Selby
{"title":"Improving uptake of colorectal cancer screening by complex patients at an academic primary care practice: a feasibility study.","authors":"Charlotte Desponds, Cyril Ducros, Carine Rochat, Laure Galassini, Patrick Bodenmann, Veronique S Grazioli, Ekaterina Plys, Christian von Plessen, Alexandre Gouveia, Kevin Selby","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002844","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Regular screening reduces mortality from colorectal cancer (CRC). The Canton of Vaud, Switzerland, has a regional screening programme offering faecal immunochemical tests (FITs) or colonoscopy. Participation in the screening programme has been low, particularly among complex patients. Patient navigation has strong evidence for increasing the CRC screening rate.</p><p><strong>Design and objective: </strong>This feasibility study tested patient navigation performed by medical assistants for complex patients at an academic primary care practice.</p><p><strong>Baseline measurements: </strong>A review of 328 patients' medical charts revealed that 51% were up-to-date with screening (16% within the programme), 24% were ineligible, 5% had a documented refusal and 20% were not up-to-date, of whom 58 (18%) were complex patients. INTERVENTION FEBRUARY 2023 TO MAY 2023: We tried to help complex patients participate in the screening programme using either in-person or telephone patient navigation. Each intervention was piloted by a physician-researcher and then performed by a medical assistant. Based on the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, maintenance framework, we collected: Intervention participation and refusal, screening acceptance and completion and both patients and medical assistant acceptability (ie, qualitative interviews).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Only 4/58 (7%) patients participated in the in-person patient navigation test phase due to scheduling problems. All four patients accepted a prescription and 2/4 (50%) completed their test. We piloted a telephone intervention to bypass scheduling issues but all patients refused a telephone discussion with the medical assistant. At two months after the last intervention, the proportion of patients up-to-date increased from 51% to 56%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our overall approach was resource-intensive and had little impact on the overall participation rate. It was likely not sustainable. New approaches and reimbursement for a specific patient navigator role are needed to increase CRC screening of complex patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11367402/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002844","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Regular screening reduces mortality from colorectal cancer (CRC). The Canton of Vaud, Switzerland, has a regional screening programme offering faecal immunochemical tests (FITs) or colonoscopy. Participation in the screening programme has been low, particularly among complex patients. Patient navigation has strong evidence for increasing the CRC screening rate.

Design and objective: This feasibility study tested patient navigation performed by medical assistants for complex patients at an academic primary care practice.

Baseline measurements: A review of 328 patients' medical charts revealed that 51% were up-to-date with screening (16% within the programme), 24% were ineligible, 5% had a documented refusal and 20% were not up-to-date, of whom 58 (18%) were complex patients. INTERVENTION FEBRUARY 2023 TO MAY 2023: We tried to help complex patients participate in the screening programme using either in-person or telephone patient navigation. Each intervention was piloted by a physician-researcher and then performed by a medical assistant. Based on the reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, maintenance framework, we collected: Intervention participation and refusal, screening acceptance and completion and both patients and medical assistant acceptability (ie, qualitative interviews).

Results: Only 4/58 (7%) patients participated in the in-person patient navigation test phase due to scheduling problems. All four patients accepted a prescription and 2/4 (50%) completed their test. We piloted a telephone intervention to bypass scheduling issues but all patients refused a telephone discussion with the medical assistant. At two months after the last intervention, the proportion of patients up-to-date increased from 51% to 56%.

Conclusion: Our overall approach was resource-intensive and had little impact on the overall participation rate. It was likely not sustainable. New approaches and reimbursement for a specific patient navigator role are needed to increase CRC screening of complex patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
提高学术性初级保健实践中复杂病人接受大肠癌筛查的比例:一项可行性研究。
背景:定期筛查可降低结肠直肠癌 (CRC) 的死亡率。瑞士沃州实施了一项地区性筛查计划,提供粪便免疫化学检验(FIT)或结肠镜检查。筛查计划的参与率一直很低,尤其是在病情复杂的患者中。有充分证据表明,患者指导可提高儿童癌症筛查率:这项可行性研究测试了在一家学术性初级医疗机构中由医疗助理为疑难杂症患者提供的患者指导:对 328 名患者的病历进行审查后发现,51% 的患者已完成筛查(16% 在计划内),24% 的患者不符合条件,5% 的患者有拒绝筛查的记录,20% 的患者未完成筛查,其中 58 人(18%)为疑难杂症患者。干预时间为 2023 年 2 月至 2023 年 5 月:我们尝试通过面对面或电话患者指导的方式,帮助疑难杂症患者参与筛查计划。每种干预措施都由一名医生研究员进行试点,然后由一名医疗助理执行。根据 "覆盖、有效性、采用、实施、维持 "框架,我们收集了以下信息:干预的参与度和拒绝度、筛查的接受度和完成度以及患者和医疗助理的接受度(即定性访谈):结果:由于时间安排问题,只有 4/58 名患者(7%)参加了患者亲自导航测试阶段。所有四名患者都接受了处方,2/4(50%)的患者完成了测试。我们试行了电话干预,以绕过时间安排问题,但所有患者都拒绝与医疗助理进行电话讨论。在最后一次干预后的两个月,完成检测的患者比例从 51% 上升到 56%:我们的总体方法需要大量资源,对总体参与率影响不大。这很可能是不可持续的。需要采用新的方法并对特定的患者导航员角色进行补偿,以提高复杂患者的 CRC 筛查率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Quality
BMJ Open Quality Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Achieving and sustaining reduction in hospital-acquired complications in an Australian local health service. Click and learn: a longitudinal interprofessional case-based sepsis education curriculum. Increasing the uptake of advance care directives through staff education and one-on-one support for people facing end-of-life. Community breast pain clinics can provide safe, quality care for women presenting with breast pain. Implementing a multisite shared haemodialysis care programme.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1