Use of a decision support tool and quick start onboarding tool in individuals with type 1 diabetes using advanced automated insulin delivery: a single-arm multi-phase intervention study.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM BMC Endocrine Disorders Pub Date : 2024-08-30 DOI:10.1186/s12902-024-01709-y
Shekhar Sehgal, Martin De Bock, Benyamin Grosman, Jonathan Williman, Natalie Kurtz, Vanessa Guzman, Andrea Benedetti, Anirban Roy, Kamuran Turksoy, Magaly Juarez, Shirley Jones, Carla Frewen, Antony Watson, Barry Taylor, Benjamin J Wheeler
{"title":"Use of a decision support tool and quick start onboarding tool in individuals with type 1 diabetes using advanced automated insulin delivery: a single-arm multi-phase intervention study.","authors":"Shekhar Sehgal, Martin De Bock, Benyamin Grosman, Jonathan Williman, Natalie Kurtz, Vanessa Guzman, Andrea Benedetti, Anirban Roy, Kamuran Turksoy, Magaly Juarez, Shirley Jones, Carla Frewen, Antony Watson, Barry Taylor, Benjamin J Wheeler","doi":"10.1186/s12902-024-01709-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multiple clinician adjustable parameters impact upon glycemia in people with type 1 diabetes (T1D) using Medtronic Mini Med 780G (MM780G) AHCL. These include glucose targets, carbohydrate ratios (CR), and active insulin time (AIT). Algorithm-based decision support advising upon potential settings adjustments may enhance clinical decision-making.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Single-arm, two-phase exploratory study developing decision support to commence and sustain AHCL. Participants commenced investigational MM780G, then 8 weeks Phase 1-initial optimization tool evaluation, involving algorithm-based decision support with weekly AIT and CR recommendations. Clinicians approved or rejected CR and AIT recommendations based on perceived safety per protocol. Co-design resulted in a refined algorithm evaluated in a further identically configured Phase 2. Phase 2 participants also transitioned to commercial MM780G following \"Quick Start\" (algorithm-derived tool determining initial AHCL settings using daily insulin dose and weight). We assessed efficacy, safety, and acceptability of decision support using glycemic metrics, and the proportion of accepted CR and AIT settings per phase.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty three participants commenced Phase 1 (mean age 24.4; Hba1c 61.5mmol/7.7%). The proportion of CR and AIT accepted by clinicians increased between Phases 1 and 2 respectively: CR 89.2% vs. 98.6%, p < 0.01; AIT 95.2% vs. 99.3%, p < 0.01. Between Phases, mean glucose percentage time < 3.9mmol (< 70mg/dl) reduced (2.1% vs. 1.4%, p = 0.04); change in mean TIR 3.9-10mmol/L (70-180mg/dl) was not statistically significant: 72.9% ± 7.8 and 73.5% ± 8.6. Quick start resulted in stable TIR, and glycemic metrics compared to international guidelines.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The co-designed decision support tools were able to deliver safe and effective therapy. They can potentially reduce the burden of diabetes management related decision making for both health care practitioners and patients.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Prospectively registered with Australia/New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry(ANZCTR) on 30th March 2021 as study ACTRN12621000360819.</p>","PeriodicalId":9152,"journal":{"name":"BMC Endocrine Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11363409/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Endocrine Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12902-024-01709-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Multiple clinician adjustable parameters impact upon glycemia in people with type 1 diabetes (T1D) using Medtronic Mini Med 780G (MM780G) AHCL. These include glucose targets, carbohydrate ratios (CR), and active insulin time (AIT). Algorithm-based decision support advising upon potential settings adjustments may enhance clinical decision-making.

Methods: Single-arm, two-phase exploratory study developing decision support to commence and sustain AHCL. Participants commenced investigational MM780G, then 8 weeks Phase 1-initial optimization tool evaluation, involving algorithm-based decision support with weekly AIT and CR recommendations. Clinicians approved or rejected CR and AIT recommendations based on perceived safety per protocol. Co-design resulted in a refined algorithm evaluated in a further identically configured Phase 2. Phase 2 participants also transitioned to commercial MM780G following "Quick Start" (algorithm-derived tool determining initial AHCL settings using daily insulin dose and weight). We assessed efficacy, safety, and acceptability of decision support using glycemic metrics, and the proportion of accepted CR and AIT settings per phase.

Results: Fifty three participants commenced Phase 1 (mean age 24.4; Hba1c 61.5mmol/7.7%). The proportion of CR and AIT accepted by clinicians increased between Phases 1 and 2 respectively: CR 89.2% vs. 98.6%, p < 0.01; AIT 95.2% vs. 99.3%, p < 0.01. Between Phases, mean glucose percentage time < 3.9mmol (< 70mg/dl) reduced (2.1% vs. 1.4%, p = 0.04); change in mean TIR 3.9-10mmol/L (70-180mg/dl) was not statistically significant: 72.9% ± 7.8 and 73.5% ± 8.6. Quick start resulted in stable TIR, and glycemic metrics compared to international guidelines.

Conclusion: The co-designed decision support tools were able to deliver safe and effective therapy. They can potentially reduce the burden of diabetes management related decision making for both health care practitioners and patients.

Trial registration: Prospectively registered with Australia/New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry(ANZCTR) on 30th March 2021 as study ACTRN12621000360819.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在使用高级自动胰岛素给药的 1 型糖尿病患者中使用决策支持工具和快速入门工具:单臂多阶段干预研究。
背景:使用美敦力 Mini Med 780G (MM780G) AHCL 的 1 型糖尿病 (T1D) 患者的血糖会受到多个临床医生可调参数的影响。这些参数包括血糖目标值、碳水化合物比率 (CR) 和胰岛素作用时间 (AIT)。基于算法的决策支持可为潜在的设置调整提供建议,从而提高临床决策水平:单臂、两阶段探索性研究,为开始和维持 AHCL 开发决策支持。参与者开始接受研究性 MM780G,然后进行为期 8 周的第一阶段-初始优化工具评估,包括基于算法的决策支持,以及每周的 AIT 和 CR 建议。临床医生根据治疗方案的安全性,批准或拒绝 CR 和 AIT 建议。共同设计的结果是在配置完全相同的第 2 阶段对改进后的算法进行评估。第二阶段的参与者也在 "快速启动 "后过渡到商用 MM780G(算法衍生工具使用每日胰岛素剂量和体重确定初始 AHCL 设置)。我们使用血糖指标评估了决策支持的有效性、安全性和可接受性,以及每个阶段接受 CR 和 AIT 设置的比例:53 名参与者开始了第一阶段(平均年龄 24.4 岁;Hba1c 61.5mmol/7.7%)。临床医生接受 CR 和 AIT 的比例在第一阶段和第二阶段之间分别有所增加:CR 89.2% vs. 98.6%, p 结论:共同设计的决策支持工具能够提供安全有效的治疗。它们有可能减轻医护人员和患者在糖尿病管理决策方面的负担:该试验于 2021 年 3 月 30 日在澳大利亚/新西兰临床试验注册中心(ANZCTR)进行了前瞻性注册,注册名为 ACTRN12621000360819。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Endocrine Disorders
BMC Endocrine Disorders ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
280
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Endocrine Disorders is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of endocrine disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
期刊最新文献
Diabetes screening among women with polycystic ovary syndrome: a descriptive study of commercial claims, 2011–2019 Unravelling a hidden pathology of a vertebral fracture in a teenage girl Exploring the unique association between high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and vitamin D deficiency in adults aged 20–59: findings based on the NHANES database Relationship between four visceral obesity indices and prediabetes and diabetes: a cross-sectional study in Dalian, China Prevalence, patterns, and determinants of vascular complications of type 2 diabetes in a teaching hospital in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a retrospective study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1