Two-week continuous glucose monitoring-derived metrics and degree of hepatic steatosis: a cross-sectional study among Chinese middle-aged and elderly participants.

IF 8.5 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Cardiovascular Diabetology Pub Date : 2024-08-31 DOI:10.1186/s12933-024-02409-6
Haili Zhong, Ke Zhang, Lishan Lin, Yan Yan, Luqi Shen, Hanzu Chen, Xinxiu Liang, Jingnan Chen, Zelei Miao, Ju-Sheng Zheng, Yu-Ming Chen
{"title":"Two-week continuous glucose monitoring-derived metrics and degree of hepatic steatosis: a cross-sectional study among Chinese middle-aged and elderly participants.","authors":"Haili Zhong, Ke Zhang, Lishan Lin, Yan Yan, Luqi Shen, Hanzu Chen, Xinxiu Liang, Jingnan Chen, Zelei Miao, Ju-Sheng Zheng, Yu-Ming Chen","doi":"10.1186/s12933-024-02409-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices provide detailed information on daily glucose control and glycemic variability. Yet limited population-based studies have explored the association between CGM metrics and fatty liver. We aimed to investigate the associations of CGM metrics with the degree of hepatic steatosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study included 1180 participants from the Guangzhou Nutrition and Health Study. CGM metrics, covering mean glucose level, glycemic variability, and in-range measures, were separately processed for all-day, nighttime, and daytime periods. Hepatic steatosis degree (healthy: n = 698; mild steatosis: n = 242; moderate/severe steatosis: n = 240) was determined by magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction. Multivariate ordinal logistic regression models were conducted to estimate the associations between CGM metrics and steatosis degree. Machine learning models were employed to evaluate the predictive performance of CGM metrics for steatosis degree.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean blood glucose, coefficient of variation (CV) of glucose, mean amplitude of glucose excursions (MAGE), and mean of daily differences (MODD) were positively associated with steatosis degree, with corresponding odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of 1.35 (1.17, 1.56), 1.21 (1.06, 1.39), 1.37 (1.19, 1.57), and 1.35 (1.17, 1.56) during all-day period. Notably, lower daytime time in range (TIR) and higher nighttime TIR were associated with higher steatosis degree, with ORs (95% CIs) of 0.83 (0.73, 0.95) and 1.16 (1.00, 1.33), respectively. For moderate/severe steatosis (vs. healthy) prediction, the average area under the receiver operating characteristic curves were higher for the nighttime (0.69) and daytime (0.66) metrics than that of all-day metrics (0.63, P < 0.001 for all comparisons). The model combining both nighttime and daytime metrics achieved the highest predictive capacity (0.73), with nighttime MODD emerging as the most important predictor.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Higher CGM-derived mean glucose and glycemic variability were linked with higher steatosis degree. CGM-derived metrics during nighttime and daytime provided distinct and complementary insights into hepatic steatosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":9374,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Diabetology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11366161/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Diabetology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12933-024-02409-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) devices provide detailed information on daily glucose control and glycemic variability. Yet limited population-based studies have explored the association between CGM metrics and fatty liver. We aimed to investigate the associations of CGM metrics with the degree of hepatic steatosis.

Methods: This cross-sectional study included 1180 participants from the Guangzhou Nutrition and Health Study. CGM metrics, covering mean glucose level, glycemic variability, and in-range measures, were separately processed for all-day, nighttime, and daytime periods. Hepatic steatosis degree (healthy: n = 698; mild steatosis: n = 242; moderate/severe steatosis: n = 240) was determined by magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction. Multivariate ordinal logistic regression models were conducted to estimate the associations between CGM metrics and steatosis degree. Machine learning models were employed to evaluate the predictive performance of CGM metrics for steatosis degree.

Results: Mean blood glucose, coefficient of variation (CV) of glucose, mean amplitude of glucose excursions (MAGE), and mean of daily differences (MODD) were positively associated with steatosis degree, with corresponding odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of 1.35 (1.17, 1.56), 1.21 (1.06, 1.39), 1.37 (1.19, 1.57), and 1.35 (1.17, 1.56) during all-day period. Notably, lower daytime time in range (TIR) and higher nighttime TIR were associated with higher steatosis degree, with ORs (95% CIs) of 0.83 (0.73, 0.95) and 1.16 (1.00, 1.33), respectively. For moderate/severe steatosis (vs. healthy) prediction, the average area under the receiver operating characteristic curves were higher for the nighttime (0.69) and daytime (0.66) metrics than that of all-day metrics (0.63, P < 0.001 for all comparisons). The model combining both nighttime and daytime metrics achieved the highest predictive capacity (0.73), with nighttime MODD emerging as the most important predictor.

Conclusions: Higher CGM-derived mean glucose and glycemic variability were linked with higher steatosis degree. CGM-derived metrics during nighttime and daytime provided distinct and complementary insights into hepatic steatosis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两周连续血糖监测指标与肝脂肪变性程度:一项针对中国中老年参与者的横断面研究。
背景:连续血糖监测(CGM)设备可提供有关日常血糖控制和血糖变异性的详细信息。然而,基于人群的研究很少探讨 CGM 指标与脂肪肝之间的关系。我们旨在研究 CGM 指标与肝脂肪变性程度之间的关系:这项横断面研究纳入了广州营养与健康研究的 1180 名参与者。CGM 指标包括平均血糖水平、血糖变异性和范围内指标,分别在全天、夜间和白天进行处理。肝脏脂肪变性程度(健康:n = 698;轻度脂肪变性:n = 242;中度/重度脂肪变性:n = 240)由磁共振成像质子密度脂肪分数确定。采用多变量序数逻辑回归模型来估计 CGM 指标与脂肪变性程度之间的关联。采用机器学习模型评估 CGM 指标对脂肪变性程度的预测性能:结果:平均血糖、血糖变异系数(CV)、血糖偏移平均幅度(MAGE)和日差异平均值(MODD)与脂肪变性程度呈正相关,全天相应的几率比(OR)和 95% 置信区间(CI)分别为 1.35(1.17,1.56)、1.21(1.06,1.39)、1.37(1.19,1.57)和 1.35(1.17,1.56)。值得注意的是,较低的日间在量程内时间(TIR)和较高的夜间 TIR 与较高的脂肪变性程度相关,ORs(95% CIs)分别为 0.83(0.73,0.95)和 1.16(1.00,1.33)。在预测中度/重度脂肪变性(与健康相比)时,夜间(0.69)和白天(0.66)指标的接收者操作特征曲线下的平均面积高于全天指标(0.63,P 结论):较高的 CGM 平均血糖和血糖变异性与较高的脂肪变性程度有关。夜间和白天 CGM 导出的指标对肝脏脂肪变性提供了不同且互补的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cardiovascular Diabetology
Cardiovascular Diabetology 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
15.10%
发文量
240
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Cardiovascular Diabetology is a journal that welcomes manuscripts exploring various aspects of the relationship between diabetes, cardiovascular health, and the metabolic syndrome. We invite submissions related to clinical studies, genetic investigations, experimental research, pharmacological studies, epidemiological analyses, and molecular biology research in this field.
期刊最新文献
The differential effects of dyslipidemia status and triglyceride-glucose index on left ventricular global function and myocardial microcirculation in diabetic individuals: a cardiac magnetic resonance study MicroRNAs in diabetic macroangiopathy Cardiometabolic benefits of fenofibrate in heart failure related to obesity and diabetes Sex inequalities in cardiovascular risk factors and their management in primary prevention in adults living with type 1 diabetes in Germany and France: findings from DPV and SFDT1 Association of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease with new-onset atrial fibrillation stratified by age groups
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1