Comparing GBA1-Parkinson's disease and idiopathic Parkinson's disease: α-Synuclein oligomers and synaptic density as biomarkers in the skin biopsy

IF 5.8 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Brain Pathology Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1111/bpa.13284
Samanta Mazzetti, Elena Contaldi, Milo Jarno Basellini, Claudia Novello, Alessandra Maria Calogero, Letizia Straniero, Federica Garrì, Valentina Ferri, Daniela Calandrella, Francesca Del Sorbo, Rosanna Asselta, Emanuele Cereda, Graziella Cappelletti, Ioannis Ugo Isaias, Gianni Pezzoli
{"title":"Comparing GBA1-Parkinson's disease and idiopathic Parkinson's disease: α-Synuclein oligomers and synaptic density as biomarkers in the skin biopsy","authors":"Samanta Mazzetti,&nbsp;Elena Contaldi,&nbsp;Milo Jarno Basellini,&nbsp;Claudia Novello,&nbsp;Alessandra Maria Calogero,&nbsp;Letizia Straniero,&nbsp;Federica Garrì,&nbsp;Valentina Ferri,&nbsp;Daniela Calandrella,&nbsp;Francesca Del Sorbo,&nbsp;Rosanna Asselta,&nbsp;Emanuele Cereda,&nbsp;Graziella Cappelletti,&nbsp;Ioannis Ugo Isaias,&nbsp;Gianni Pezzoli","doi":"10.1111/bpa.13284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The main genetic risk factors for Parkinson's disease (PD) are presently represented by variants in <i>GBA1</i> gene encoding for the β-glucocerebrosidase (GCase). Searching for a peripheral biomarker that can be used for selecting and monitoring patients in clinical trials targeting <i>GBA1</i>-associated PD (<i>GBA1</i>-PD) is a current challenge. We previously demonstrated that α-synuclein oligomers expressed as proximity ligation assay (PLA) score in synaptic terminals of skin biopsy are a reliable biomarker for distinguishing idiopathic PD (iPD) from healthy controls (HC). This cross-sectional study investigates an unexplored cohort of <i>GBA1</i>-PD (<i>n</i> = 27) compared to 28 HC, and 36 iPD cases to (i) analyze α-synuclein oligomers and quantify them throughout PLA score, (ii) investigate GCase expression in brain and synaptic terminals targeting the sweat gland, (iii) unravel indicators that could differentiate patients with specific <i>GBA1</i> mutations. PLA score discriminates <i>GBA1</i>-PD from HC with sensitivity = 88.9% (95% CI 70.84–97.65), specificity = 88.5% (95% CI 69.85–97.55), and PPV = 88.9% (95% CI 73.24–95.90), AUC value = 0.927 (95% CI 0.859–0.996). No difference was found between <i>GBA1</i>-PD patients and iPD, suggesting a common pathological pathway based on α-synuclein oligomers. GCase score did not differ in <i>GBA1</i>-PD, iPD, and HC in the synaptic terminals, whereas a positive correlation was found between PLA score and GCase score. Moreover, a significant increase in synaptic density was observed in <i>GBA1</i>-PD compared to iPD and HC (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.0001). Employing ROC curve to discriminate <i>GBA1</i>-PD from iPD, we found an AUC value for synaptic density = 0.855 (95% CI 0.749–0.961) with sensitivity = 85.2% (95% CI 66.27%–95.81%), specificity = 77.1% (95% CI 59.86%–89.58%), and PPV = 74.19% (60.53%–84.35%). The highest synaptic density values were observed in p.N409S patients. This work points out to the value of both PLA score and synaptic density in distinguishing <i>GBA1</i>-PD from iPD and to their potential to stratify and monitor patients in the context of new pathway-specific therapeutic options.</p>","PeriodicalId":9290,"journal":{"name":"Brain Pathology","volume":"34 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/bpa.13284","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bpa.13284","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The main genetic risk factors for Parkinson's disease (PD) are presently represented by variants in GBA1 gene encoding for the β-glucocerebrosidase (GCase). Searching for a peripheral biomarker that can be used for selecting and monitoring patients in clinical trials targeting GBA1-associated PD (GBA1-PD) is a current challenge. We previously demonstrated that α-synuclein oligomers expressed as proximity ligation assay (PLA) score in synaptic terminals of skin biopsy are a reliable biomarker for distinguishing idiopathic PD (iPD) from healthy controls (HC). This cross-sectional study investigates an unexplored cohort of GBA1-PD (n = 27) compared to 28 HC, and 36 iPD cases to (i) analyze α-synuclein oligomers and quantify them throughout PLA score, (ii) investigate GCase expression in brain and synaptic terminals targeting the sweat gland, (iii) unravel indicators that could differentiate patients with specific GBA1 mutations. PLA score discriminates GBA1-PD from HC with sensitivity = 88.9% (95% CI 70.84–97.65), specificity = 88.5% (95% CI 69.85–97.55), and PPV = 88.9% (95% CI 73.24–95.90), AUC value = 0.927 (95% CI 0.859–0.996). No difference was found between GBA1-PD patients and iPD, suggesting a common pathological pathway based on α-synuclein oligomers. GCase score did not differ in GBA1-PD, iPD, and HC in the synaptic terminals, whereas a positive correlation was found between PLA score and GCase score. Moreover, a significant increase in synaptic density was observed in GBA1-PD compared to iPD and HC (P < 0.0001). Employing ROC curve to discriminate GBA1-PD from iPD, we found an AUC value for synaptic density = 0.855 (95% CI 0.749–0.961) with sensitivity = 85.2% (95% CI 66.27%–95.81%), specificity = 77.1% (95% CI 59.86%–89.58%), and PPV = 74.19% (60.53%–84.35%). The highest synaptic density values were observed in p.N409S patients. This work points out to the value of both PLA score and synaptic density in distinguishing GBA1-PD from iPD and to their potential to stratify and monitor patients in the context of new pathway-specific therapeutic options.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较 GBA1-帕金森病和特发性帕金森病:皮肤生物标记物中的α-突触核蛋白寡聚体和突触密度。
帕金森病(PD)的主要遗传风险因素目前以编码β-葡糖脑苷脂(GCase)的GBA1基因变异为代表。在针对 GBA1 相关帕金森病(GBA1-PD)的临床试验中,寻找一种可用于选择和监测患者的外周生物标记物是目前面临的一项挑战。我们以前曾证实,在皮肤活检的突触末端中以邻近结扎法(PLA)评分表达的α-突触核蛋白寡聚体是区分特发性帕金森病(iPD)和健康对照组(HC)的可靠生物标记物。这项横断面研究调查了一组尚未研究过的GBA1-PD患者(n = 27),与28例HC患者和36例iPD病例进行了比较,目的是:(i) 分析α-突触核蛋白寡聚体,并通过PLA评分对其进行量化;(ii) 调查GCase在大脑和以汗腺为目标的突触末端的表达;(iii) 揭示可区分特定GBA1突变患者的指标。PLA 评分能将 GBA1-PD 与 HC 区分开来,灵敏度 = 88.9% (95% CI 70.84-97.65),特异度 = 88.5% (95% CI 69.85-97.55),PPV = 88.9% (95% CI 73.24-95.90),AUC 值 = 0.927 (95% CI 0.859-0.996)。GBA1-PD患者和iPD患者之间没有发现差异,这表明基于α-突触核蛋白寡聚体的病理途径是相同的。在突触末端,GBA1-PD、iPD 和 HC 的 GCase 评分没有差异,而 PLA 评分与 GCase 评分呈正相关。此外,与 iPD 和 HC 相比,GBA1-PD 的突触密度明显增加(P
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Brain Pathology
Brain Pathology 医学-病理学
CiteScore
13.20
自引率
3.10%
发文量
90
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Brain Pathology is the journal of choice for biomedical scientists investigating diseases of the nervous system. The official journal of the International Society of Neuropathology, Brain Pathology is a peer-reviewed quarterly publication that includes original research, review articles and symposia focuses on the pathogenesis of neurological disease.
期刊最新文献
A broader outlook is required to stage and classify pituitary neoplasms for patient care. Clinico-sero-pathological characteristics of anti-Ha antisynthetase syndrome. The prevalence of chronic traumatic encephalopathy in a historical epilepsy post-mortem collection. Altered immune response is associated with sex difference in vulnerability to Alzheimer's disease in human prefrontal cortex. A pineal region mass in a 55-year-old female.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1