Comparative Efficacy of Colchicine and Intensive Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Lowering in Patients with Atherosclerotic Diseases receiving Statins: A Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Zhenhong Ou, Fangchao Wang, Yunlin Chen, Xueyuan Liu, Boli Ran, Yuehui Yin, Kun Cui
{"title":"Comparative Efficacy of Colchicine and Intensive Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Lowering in Patients with Atherosclerotic Diseases receiving Statins: A Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Zhenhong Ou, Fangchao Wang, Yunlin Chen, Xueyuan Liu, Boli Ran, Yuehui Yin, Kun Cui","doi":"10.1007/s10557-024-07622-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Adding intensive low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C)-lowering agents or colchicine to statin has been shown to result in additional cardiovascular benefits for patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVD). We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of these supplementary agents in patients with ASCVD receiving statin.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a systematic review and frequentist network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. The primary efficacy endpoint was the main adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), and the secondary efficacy endpoints were myocardial infarct, stroke, coronary revascularization, cardiovascular death, and all-cause mortality, respectively. The safety endpoints were treatment discontinuation and non-cardiovascular death. We obtained estimates for efficacy outcomes and safety endpoints and presented these estimates as risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals. We ranked the comparative efficacy and safety of all drugs with P-scores.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventeen trials totaling 85,823 participants treated with colchicine (5926 participants), intensive LDL-C lowering (37,854 participants) via proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitor, Niemann-Pick C1-like 1 protein (NPC1L1) inhibitor or ATP citrate lyase (ACL) inhibitor, or statin alone (42,043 participants) were included. Colchicine was associated with a greater reduction in the risk of MACE (RR 0.72, 0.69-0.91), stroke (RR 0.55, 0.33-0.92), and coronary revascularization (RR 0.73, 0.60-0.90) compared with NPC1L1 inhibitor, and it provided a larger reduction in the risk of MACE (RR 0.79, 0.69-0.91) compared to PCSK9 inhibitor. However, colchicine was associated with increased risk of non-cardiovascular death compared with NPC1L1 inhibitor (RR 1.48, 1.04-2.10) and PCSK9 inhibitor (RR 1.57, 1.08-2.27). Although no regimen prolonged survival, colchicine had worse performance on non-cardiovascular death and all-cause mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with ASCVD receiving statin, colchicine seems to be more effective than intensive LDL-C-lowering therapy with PCSK9 inhibitor or NPC1L1 inhibitor for cardiovascular prevention. However, using colchicine as an alternative to intensive LDL-C-lowering therapy may need to be weighed against the cardiovascular benefits and the potential harms of higher non-cardiovascular death.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>PROSPERO Identifier: CRD42023441385.</p>","PeriodicalId":9557,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10557-024-07622-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aims: Adding intensive low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C)-lowering agents or colchicine to statin has been shown to result in additional cardiovascular benefits for patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (ASCVD). We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of these supplementary agents in patients with ASCVD receiving statin.
Methods: We performed a systematic review and frequentist network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. The primary efficacy endpoint was the main adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), and the secondary efficacy endpoints were myocardial infarct, stroke, coronary revascularization, cardiovascular death, and all-cause mortality, respectively. The safety endpoints were treatment discontinuation and non-cardiovascular death. We obtained estimates for efficacy outcomes and safety endpoints and presented these estimates as risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals. We ranked the comparative efficacy and safety of all drugs with P-scores.
Results: Seventeen trials totaling 85,823 participants treated with colchicine (5926 participants), intensive LDL-C lowering (37,854 participants) via proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitor, Niemann-Pick C1-like 1 protein (NPC1L1) inhibitor or ATP citrate lyase (ACL) inhibitor, or statin alone (42,043 participants) were included. Colchicine was associated with a greater reduction in the risk of MACE (RR 0.72, 0.69-0.91), stroke (RR 0.55, 0.33-0.92), and coronary revascularization (RR 0.73, 0.60-0.90) compared with NPC1L1 inhibitor, and it provided a larger reduction in the risk of MACE (RR 0.79, 0.69-0.91) compared to PCSK9 inhibitor. However, colchicine was associated with increased risk of non-cardiovascular death compared with NPC1L1 inhibitor (RR 1.48, 1.04-2.10) and PCSK9 inhibitor (RR 1.57, 1.08-2.27). Although no regimen prolonged survival, colchicine had worse performance on non-cardiovascular death and all-cause mortality.
Conclusions: In patients with ASCVD receiving statin, colchicine seems to be more effective than intensive LDL-C-lowering therapy with PCSK9 inhibitor or NPC1L1 inhibitor for cardiovascular prevention. However, using colchicine as an alternative to intensive LDL-C-lowering therapy may need to be weighed against the cardiovascular benefits and the potential harms of higher non-cardiovascular death.
期刊介绍：
Designed to objectively cover the process of bench to bedside development of cardiovascular drug, device and cell therapy, and to bring you the information you need most in a timely and useful format, Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy takes a fresh and energetic look at advances in this dynamic field.
Homing in on the most exciting work being done on new therapeutic agents, Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy focusses on developments in atherosclerosis, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, ischemic syndromes and arrhythmias. The Journal is an authoritative source of current and relevant information that is indispensable for basic and clinical investigators aiming for novel, breakthrough research as well as for cardiologists seeking to best serve their patients.
Providing you with a single, concise reference tool acknowledged to be among the finest in the world, Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy is listed in Web of Science and PubMed/Medline among other abstracting and indexing services. The regular articles and frequent special topical issues equip you with an up-to-date source defined by the need for accurate information on an ever-evolving field. Cardiovascular Drugs and Therapy is a careful and accurate guide through the maze of new products and therapies which furnishes you with the details on cardiovascular pharmacology that you will refer to time and time again.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
