A Brief History of Polyclonal Antibody Therapies Against Bacterial and Viral Diseases Before COVID-19.

3区 医学 Q2 Medicine Current topics in microbiology and immunology Pub Date : 2024-08-30 DOI:10.1007/82_2024_279
Nigel Paneth, Madison Walsh, Breanna Kornatowski, Arturo Casadevall
{"title":"A Brief History of Polyclonal Antibody Therapies Against Bacterial and Viral Diseases Before COVID-19.","authors":"Nigel Paneth, Madison Walsh, Breanna Kornatowski, Arturo Casadevall","doi":"10.1007/82_2024_279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The use of the serum or plasma of patients or animals who have recovered from an infectious disease, or had been immunized with a relevant antigen, to treat or prevent the same infection in others began in the late 1880s when French and German scientists uncovered, one step at a time, several of the elements of the immune system's response to infection. A key finding was that the damage caused by some bacteria depends upon their secreted toxins which can be neutralized by biologic agents. Antitoxins to diphtheria and tetanus began to be manufactured in large animals in France, Germany, and the US in the 1890s and were soon being used worldwide. The impact of diphtheria antitoxin on childhood mortality was profound. Shortly after the development of antitoxins, convalescent serum began to be used for its anti-bactericidal properties thus addressing serious infections caused by non-toxin-producing organisms. The effectiveness of antitoxins and antisera was demonstrated by examining mortality rates in hospitals before and after the introduction of antitoxins, by comparisons of treated and untreated patients, by comparing early and late treatment and dosage, by examining vital data mortality trends, and by several randomized and alternate assignment trials. Antitoxins continue to have a role in the rare cases of diphtheria and other conditions largely eradicated by immunization, but serum therapy nearly disappeared from the medical armamentarium with the development of antibiotics in the 1940s. Inasmuch as new human pathogens are now emerging with unprecedented regularity as seen in the recent COVID-19 pandemic, and because specific therapies are unlikely to be available for them, plasma-based antibody therapies are likely to again carve out a niche in infectious disease control.</p>","PeriodicalId":11102,"journal":{"name":"Current topics in microbiology and immunology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current topics in microbiology and immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/82_2024_279","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of the serum or plasma of patients or animals who have recovered from an infectious disease, or had been immunized with a relevant antigen, to treat or prevent the same infection in others began in the late 1880s when French and German scientists uncovered, one step at a time, several of the elements of the immune system's response to infection. A key finding was that the damage caused by some bacteria depends upon their secreted toxins which can be neutralized by biologic agents. Antitoxins to diphtheria and tetanus began to be manufactured in large animals in France, Germany, and the US in the 1890s and were soon being used worldwide. The impact of diphtheria antitoxin on childhood mortality was profound. Shortly after the development of antitoxins, convalescent serum began to be used for its anti-bactericidal properties thus addressing serious infections caused by non-toxin-producing organisms. The effectiveness of antitoxins and antisera was demonstrated by examining mortality rates in hospitals before and after the introduction of antitoxins, by comparisons of treated and untreated patients, by comparing early and late treatment and dosage, by examining vital data mortality trends, and by several randomized and alternate assignment trials. Antitoxins continue to have a role in the rare cases of diphtheria and other conditions largely eradicated by immunization, but serum therapy nearly disappeared from the medical armamentarium with the development of antibiotics in the 1940s. Inasmuch as new human pathogens are now emerging with unprecedented regularity as seen in the recent COVID-19 pandemic, and because specific therapies are unlikely to be available for them, plasma-based antibody therapies are likely to again carve out a niche in infectious disease control.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 之前多克隆抗体治疗细菌和病毒疾病的简史。
利用从传染病中康复的病人或动物的血清或血浆,或用相关抗原进行免疫接种的病人或动物的血清或血浆,来治疗或预防其他人受到同样的感染,始于 19 世纪 80 年代末,当时法国和德国的科学家们一步一步地发现了免疫系统对感染做出反应的几个要素。一个重要发现是,某些细菌造成的损害取决于它们分泌的毒素,而生物制剂可以中和这些毒素。19 世纪 90 年代,法国、德国和美国开始用大型动物制造白喉和破伤风抗毒素,并很快在全球范围内使用。白喉抗毒素对儿童死亡率的影响是深远的。抗毒素研制成功后不久,开始使用具有抗菌特性的康复血清,从而解决了由非产毒菌引起的严重感染问题。通过对使用抗毒素前后医院的死亡率进行研究、对接受治疗和未接受治疗的病人进行比较、对早期和晚期治疗及剂量进行比较、对生命数据死亡率趋势进行研究,以及通过几项随机和交替分配试验,证明了抗毒素和抗血清的有效性。抗毒素在白喉和其他因免疫接种而基本绝迹的罕见病例中继续发挥作用,但随着 20 世纪 40 年代抗生素的发展,血清疗法几乎从医疗手段中消失。从最近的 COVID-19 大流行中可以看出,新的人类病原体正以前所未有的规律性出现,由于不可能有针对这些病原体的特效疗法,血浆抗体疗法很可能再次在传染病控制领域占据一席之地。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The review series Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology provides a synthesis of the latest research findings in the areas of molecular immunology, bacteriology and virology. Each timely volume contains a wealth of information on the featured subject. This review series is designed to provide access to up-to-date, often previously unpublished information.
期刊最新文献
A Brief History of Polyclonal Antibody Therapies Against Bacterial and Viral Diseases Before COVID-19. Alterations of the AKT Pathway in Sporadic Human Tumors, Inherited Susceptibility to Cancer, and Overgrowth Syndromes. Evidence for the Efficacy of COVID-19 Convalescent Plasma. HemoClear: A Practical and Cost-Effective Alternative to Conventional Convalescent Plasma Retrieval Methods. Monoclonal Antibody Therapies Against SARS-CoV-2: Promises and Realities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1