Viability of Whole-Slide Imaging for Intraoperative Touch Imprint Cytological Diagnosis of Axillary Sentinel Lymph Nodes in Breast Cancer Patients.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q4 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY Diagnostic Cytopathology Pub Date : 2024-08-29 DOI:10.1002/dc.25401
Fei Ren, Huange Li, Wentao Yang, Ying Chen, Yuwei Zheng, Hao Zhang, Shuling Zhou, Bo Ping, Peng Shi, Xiaochun Wan, Yanli Wang
{"title":"Viability of Whole-Slide Imaging for Intraoperative Touch Imprint Cytological Diagnosis of Axillary Sentinel Lymph Nodes in Breast Cancer Patients.","authors":"Fei Ren, Huange Li, Wentao Yang, Ying Chen, Yuwei Zheng, Hao Zhang, Shuling Zhou, Bo Ping, Peng Shi, Xiaochun Wan, Yanli Wang","doi":"10.1002/dc.25401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Whole-slide imaging (WSI) is a promising tool in pathology. However, the use of WSI in cytopathology has lagged behind that in histology. We aimed to evaluate the utility of WSI for the intraoperative touch imprint cytological diagnosis of axillary sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in breast cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Glass slides from touch imprint cytology of 480 axillary SLNs were scanned using two different WSI scanners. The intra- and interobserver concordance, accuracy, possible reasons for misdiagnosis, scanning time, and review time for three cytopathologists were compared between WSI and light microscopy (LM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 4320 diagnoses were obtained. There was substantial to strong intraobserver concordance when comparing reads among paired LM slides and WSI digital slides (κ coefficient ranged from 0.63 to 0.88, and concordance rates ranged from 94.58% to 98.33%). Substantial to strong interobserver agreement was also observed among the three cytopathologists (κ coefficient ranged from 0.67 to 0.85, and concordance rates ranged from 95.42% to 97.92%). The accuracy of LM was slightly higher (average of 98.06%) than that of WSI (averages of 96.81% and 97.78%). The majority of misdiagnoses were false negative diagnoses due to the following top three causes: few cancer cells, confusing cancer cells with histiocytes, and confusing cancer cells with lymphocytes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study is the first to address the feasibility of WSI in touch imprint cytology. The use of WSI for intraoperative touch imprint cytological diagnosis of SLNs is a practical option when experienced staff are not available on-site.</p>","PeriodicalId":11349,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic Cytopathology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic Cytopathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/dc.25401","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Whole-slide imaging (WSI) is a promising tool in pathology. However, the use of WSI in cytopathology has lagged behind that in histology. We aimed to evaluate the utility of WSI for the intraoperative touch imprint cytological diagnosis of axillary sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in breast cancer patients.

Methods: Glass slides from touch imprint cytology of 480 axillary SLNs were scanned using two different WSI scanners. The intra- and interobserver concordance, accuracy, possible reasons for misdiagnosis, scanning time, and review time for three cytopathologists were compared between WSI and light microscopy (LM).

Results: A total of 4320 diagnoses were obtained. There was substantial to strong intraobserver concordance when comparing reads among paired LM slides and WSI digital slides (κ coefficient ranged from 0.63 to 0.88, and concordance rates ranged from 94.58% to 98.33%). Substantial to strong interobserver agreement was also observed among the three cytopathologists (κ coefficient ranged from 0.67 to 0.85, and concordance rates ranged from 95.42% to 97.92%). The accuracy of LM was slightly higher (average of 98.06%) than that of WSI (averages of 96.81% and 97.78%). The majority of misdiagnoses were false negative diagnoses due to the following top three causes: few cancer cells, confusing cancer cells with histiocytes, and confusing cancer cells with lymphocytes.

Conclusions: This study is the first to address the feasibility of WSI in touch imprint cytology. The use of WSI for intraoperative touch imprint cytological diagnosis of SLNs is a practical option when experienced staff are not available on-site.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于乳腺癌患者腋窝前哨淋巴结术中触摸印迹细胞学诊断的整体滑动成像可行性。
背景:全切片成像(WSI)是病理学中一种前景广阔的工具。然而,WSI 在细胞病理学中的应用却落后于组织学。我们旨在评估 WSI 在乳腺癌患者腋窝前哨淋巴结(SLN)术中触印细胞学诊断中的实用性:使用两台不同的 WSI 扫描仪对 480 个腋窝 SLN 的玻璃片进行了触印式细胞学扫描。比较了 WSI 和光学显微镜(LM)在观察者内部和观察者之间的一致性、准确性、可能的误诊原因、扫描时间以及三位细胞病理学家的复查时间:结果:共获得 4320 项诊断结果。在比较配对的 LM 切片和 WSI 数字切片的读取结果时,观察者内部的一致性非常高(κ系数介于 0.63 和 0.88 之间,一致率介于 94.58% 和 98.33% 之间)。三位细胞病理学家的观察结果也基本一致(κ系数介于 0.67 和 0.85 之间,一致率介于 95.42% 和 97.92% 之间)。LM 的准确率(平均 98.06%)略高于 WSI(平均 96.81% 和 97.78%)。大部分误诊为假阴性诊断,原因主要有以下三点:癌细胞数量少、混淆癌细胞与组织细胞、混淆癌细胞与淋巴细胞:本研究首次探讨了 WSI 在触摸印迹细胞学中的可行性。当现场没有经验丰富的工作人员时,使用 WSI 对 SLN 进行术中触摸印迹细胞学诊断是一种实用的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Diagnostic Cytopathology
Diagnostic Cytopathology 医学-病理学
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
163
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Diagnostic Cytopathology is intended to provide a forum for the exchange of information in the field of cytopathology, with special emphasis on the practical, clinical aspects of the discipline. The editors invite original scientific articles, as well as special review articles, feature articles, and letters to the editor, from laboratory professionals engaged in the practice of cytopathology. Manuscripts are accepted for publication on the basis of scientific merit, practical significance, and suitability for publication in a journal dedicated to this discipline. Original articles can be considered only with the understanding that they have never been published before and that they have not been submitted for simultaneous review to another publication.
期刊最新文献
From sampling to cellblock: The fully automated journey of cytological specimens. Reproducibility assessment of WHO reporting system for pancreaticobiliary cytopathology: A single institution experience. Cytological diagnosis of follicular dendritic cell sarcoma with a unique pattern of D2-40 immunoexpression. THADA-IGF2BP3 gene fusions in thyroid fine needle aspiration is involved in the pathway to "noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features". Extracranial metastasis from a frontal embryonal tumor to the parotid: Cytomorphologic features of a rare occurrence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1