Prediction of incident atrial fibrillation using deep learning, clinical models, and polygenic scores.

IF 37.6 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS European Heart Journal Pub Date : 2024-12-07 DOI:10.1093/eurheartj/ehae595
Gilbert Jabbour, Alexis Nolin-Lapalme, Olivier Tastet, Denis Corbin, Paloma Jordà, Achille Sowa, Jacques Delfrate, David Busseuil, Julie G Hussin, Marie-Pierre Dubé, Jean-Claude Tardif, Léna Rivard, Laurent Macle, Julia Cadrin-Tourigny, Paul Khairy, Robert Avram, Rafik Tadros
{"title":"Prediction of incident atrial fibrillation using deep learning, clinical models, and polygenic scores.","authors":"Gilbert Jabbour, Alexis Nolin-Lapalme, Olivier Tastet, Denis Corbin, Paloma Jordà, Achille Sowa, Jacques Delfrate, David Busseuil, Julie G Hussin, Marie-Pierre Dubé, Jean-Claude Tardif, Léna Rivard, Laurent Macle, Julia Cadrin-Tourigny, Paul Khairy, Robert Avram, Rafik Tadros","doi":"10.1093/eurheartj/ehae595","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Deep learning applied to electrocardiograms (ECG-AI) is an emerging approach for predicting atrial fibrillation or flutter (AF). This study introduces an ECG-AI model developed and tested at a tertiary cardiac centre, comparing its performance with clinical models and AF polygenic score (PGS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Electrocardiograms in sinus rhythm from the Montreal Heart Institute were analysed, excluding those from patients with pre-existing AF. The primary outcome was incident AF at 5 years. An ECG-AI model was developed by splitting patients into non-overlapping data sets: 70% for training, 10% for validation, and 20% for testing. The performance of ECG-AI, clinical models, and PGS was assessed in the test data set. The ECG-AI model was externally validated in the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV (MIMIC-IV) hospital data set.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 669 782 ECGs from 145 323 patients were included. Mean age was 61 ± 15 years, and 58% were male. The primary outcome was observed in 15% of patients, and the ECG-AI model showed an area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC-ROC) curve of .78. In time-to-event analysis including the first ECG, ECG-AI inference of high risk identified 26% of the population with a 4.3-fold increased risk of incident AF (95% confidence interval: 4.02-4.57). In a subgroup analysis of 2301 patients, ECG-AI outperformed CHARGE-AF (AUC-ROC = .62) and PGS (AUC-ROC = .59). Adding PGS and CHARGE-AF to ECG-AI improved goodness of fit (likelihood ratio test P < .001), with minimal changes to the AUC-ROC (.76-.77). In the external validation cohort (mean age 59 ± 18 years, 47% male, median follow-up 1.1 year), ECG-AI model performance remained consistent (AUC-ROC = .77).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ECG-AI provides an accurate tool to predict new-onset AF in a tertiary cardiac centre, surpassing clinical and PGS.</p>","PeriodicalId":11976,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal","volume":" ","pages":"4920-4934"},"PeriodicalIF":37.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11631091/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae595","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Deep learning applied to electrocardiograms (ECG-AI) is an emerging approach for predicting atrial fibrillation or flutter (AF). This study introduces an ECG-AI model developed and tested at a tertiary cardiac centre, comparing its performance with clinical models and AF polygenic score (PGS).

Methods: Electrocardiograms in sinus rhythm from the Montreal Heart Institute were analysed, excluding those from patients with pre-existing AF. The primary outcome was incident AF at 5 years. An ECG-AI model was developed by splitting patients into non-overlapping data sets: 70% for training, 10% for validation, and 20% for testing. The performance of ECG-AI, clinical models, and PGS was assessed in the test data set. The ECG-AI model was externally validated in the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-IV (MIMIC-IV) hospital data set.

Results: A total of 669 782 ECGs from 145 323 patients were included. Mean age was 61 ± 15 years, and 58% were male. The primary outcome was observed in 15% of patients, and the ECG-AI model showed an area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC-ROC) curve of .78. In time-to-event analysis including the first ECG, ECG-AI inference of high risk identified 26% of the population with a 4.3-fold increased risk of incident AF (95% confidence interval: 4.02-4.57). In a subgroup analysis of 2301 patients, ECG-AI outperformed CHARGE-AF (AUC-ROC = .62) and PGS (AUC-ROC = .59). Adding PGS and CHARGE-AF to ECG-AI improved goodness of fit (likelihood ratio test P < .001), with minimal changes to the AUC-ROC (.76-.77). In the external validation cohort (mean age 59 ± 18 years, 47% male, median follow-up 1.1 year), ECG-AI model performance remained consistent (AUC-ROC = .77).

Conclusions: ECG-AI provides an accurate tool to predict new-onset AF in a tertiary cardiac centre, surpassing clinical and PGS.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用深度学习、临床模型和多基因评分预测心房颤动事件。
背景和目的:将深度学习应用于心电图(ECG-AI)是预测心房颤动或扑动(AF)的一种新兴方法。本研究介绍了在一家三级心脏病中心开发和测试的心电图-人工智能模型,并将其性能与临床和房颤多基因评分(PGS)进行了比较:对蒙特利尔心脏研究所的窦性心律心电图进行了分析,排除了原有房颤患者的心电图。主要结果是 5 年后发生的房颤。通过将患者分成不重叠的数据集来开发心电图-人工智能模型:70%用于训练,10%用于验证,20%用于测试。在测试数据集中评估了心电图-人工智能、临床模型和 PGS 的性能。心电图人工智能模型在重症监护医疗信息市场-IV(MIMIC-IV)医院数据集中进行了外部验证:结果:共纳入了来自 145,323 名患者的 669,782 张心电图。平均年龄为 61±15 岁,58% 为男性。15%的患者观察到了主要结果,ECG-AI模型的接收者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC)为0.78。在包括首次心电图在内的时间到事件分析中,ECG-AI 的高风险推断确定了 26% 的人群发生房颤的风险增加了 4.3 倍(95% 置信区间为 4.02-4.57)。在对 2301 名患者进行的亚组分析中,ECG-AI 的表现优于 CHARGE-AF(AUC=0.62)和 PGS(AUC=0.59)。将 PGS 和 CHARGE-AF 加入 ECG-AI 可提高拟合优度(似然比检验 p 结论:在一家三级心脏病中心,ECG-AI 是预测新发房颤的准确工具,超过了临床和多基因评分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Heart Journal
European Heart Journal 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
39.30
自引率
6.90%
发文量
3942
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The European Heart Journal is a renowned international journal that focuses on cardiovascular medicine. It is published weekly and is the official journal of the European Society of Cardiology. This peer-reviewed journal is committed to publishing high-quality clinical and scientific material pertaining to all aspects of cardiovascular medicine. It covers a diverse range of topics including research findings, technical evaluations, and reviews. Moreover, the journal serves as a platform for the exchange of information and discussions on various aspects of cardiovascular medicine, including educational matters. In addition to original papers on cardiovascular medicine and surgery, the European Heart Journal also presents reviews, clinical perspectives, ESC Guidelines, and editorial articles that highlight recent advancements in cardiology. Additionally, the journal actively encourages readers to share their thoughts and opinions through correspondence.
期刊最新文献
The year in cardiovascular medicine 2024: the top 10 papers in heart failure. Fatal coronary embolism in infective endocarditis: a case of sudden circulatory collapse. Immunometabolic switch in hypertension: how dendritic cell mineralocorticoid receptors drive Th17 polarization and blood pressure control. Non-neuronal ventricular cardiomyocyte-located nicotinergic acetylcholine receptors cause remodelling and arrhythmias. Weekly Journal Scan: RESHAPing potential treatment indications for functional mitral regurgitation in heart failure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1