Early childcare and developmental delay risk at 3.5 years: Insights from the French ELFE cohort.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS European Journal of Pediatrics Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-31 DOI:10.1007/s00431-024-05742-w
Alexandre Ramchandar Gomajee, Katharine Michelle Barry, Eloi Chazelas, Marie-Noëlle Dufourg, Florencia Barreto-Zarza, Maria Melchior
{"title":"Early childcare and developmental delay risk at 3.5 years: Insights from the French ELFE cohort.","authors":"Alexandre Ramchandar Gomajee, Katharine Michelle Barry, Eloi Chazelas, Marie-Noëlle Dufourg, Florencia Barreto-Zarza, Maria Melchior","doi":"10.1007/s00431-024-05742-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We tested the association between early childcare attendance in the first three years of life and child development at age 3.5 years in the French context, where early childcare is subsidized. In the ELFE (Étude Longitudinale Français depuis l'Enfance) birth cohort study set in metropolitan France, children's development was reported by parents at age 3.5 years (n = 11,033) via the Child Development Inventory (CDI) questionnaire. CDI scores were transformed into a development quotient (DQ), with a DQ < 90 corresponding to possible and a DQ < 85 corresponding to a probable developmental delay. Inverse probability weighted multivariable regression models were used to analyse whether early childcare in the first three years of life (centre-based, childminder, informal or parental care) was associated to development delay. Compared to children in exclusive parental care, those in centre-based childcare (CBC) or with a childminder prior to school entry were significantly less likely to experience possible (OR = 0.56, [95% CI = 0.51-0.61] for CBC and OR = 0.77, [95% CI = 0.72-0.83] for childminder attendance) and probable developmental delay (OR = 0.62, [0.58-0.67] for CBC and OR = 0.80 [0.76-0.83] for childminder). Informal childcare attendance was not significantly associated with children's possible nor probable developmental delay ((OR = 0.97, [0.84-1.12]) and (OR = 0.97, [0.82-1.15]), respectively). Conclusions: Overall, our findings add to the existing scientific literature, showing that in the French context, where childcare can start as early as 3 months of age, early childcare attendance can contribute to child's development. What's Known on This Subject: • Studies on early childcare attendance and child development have shown mixed results, associations with better psychomotor development mainly being observed in Nordic countries, while some studies in other countries such as the USA showed no or negative associations. What This Study Adds: • In a country with broad and subsidized access to childcare such as France, access to early childhood education can positively contribute to children's psychomotor development. However, we found that access to childcare does not appear to reduce social inequalities in children's psychomotor development.</p>","PeriodicalId":11997,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"4763-4772"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00431-024-05742-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We tested the association between early childcare attendance in the first three years of life and child development at age 3.5 years in the French context, where early childcare is subsidized. In the ELFE (Étude Longitudinale Français depuis l'Enfance) birth cohort study set in metropolitan France, children's development was reported by parents at age 3.5 years (n = 11,033) via the Child Development Inventory (CDI) questionnaire. CDI scores were transformed into a development quotient (DQ), with a DQ < 90 corresponding to possible and a DQ < 85 corresponding to a probable developmental delay. Inverse probability weighted multivariable regression models were used to analyse whether early childcare in the first three years of life (centre-based, childminder, informal or parental care) was associated to development delay. Compared to children in exclusive parental care, those in centre-based childcare (CBC) or with a childminder prior to school entry were significantly less likely to experience possible (OR = 0.56, [95% CI = 0.51-0.61] for CBC and OR = 0.77, [95% CI = 0.72-0.83] for childminder attendance) and probable developmental delay (OR = 0.62, [0.58-0.67] for CBC and OR = 0.80 [0.76-0.83] for childminder). Informal childcare attendance was not significantly associated with children's possible nor probable developmental delay ((OR = 0.97, [0.84-1.12]) and (OR = 0.97, [0.82-1.15]), respectively). Conclusions: Overall, our findings add to the existing scientific literature, showing that in the French context, where childcare can start as early as 3 months of age, early childcare attendance can contribute to child's development. What's Known on This Subject: • Studies on early childcare attendance and child development have shown mixed results, associations with better psychomotor development mainly being observed in Nordic countries, while some studies in other countries such as the USA showed no or negative associations. What This Study Adds: • In a country with broad and subsidized access to childcare such as France, access to early childhood education can positively contribute to children's psychomotor development. However, we found that access to childcare does not appear to reduce social inequalities in children's psychomotor development.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
早期儿童保育与 3.5 岁发育迟缓风险:来自法国 ELFE 队列的启示。
在法国,早期托儿服务是有补贴的,在此背景下,我们测试了出生后头三年参加早期托儿服务与 3.5 岁儿童发育之间的关系。在法国本土进行的 ELFE(Étude Longitudinale Français depuis l'Enfance)出生队列研究中,父母通过儿童发展量表(CDI)问卷报告了 3.5 岁儿童的发展情况(n = 11,033 人)。CDI 分数被转换为发展商数 (DQ),DQ 为
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
2.80%
发文量
367
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Pediatrics (EJPE) is a leading peer-reviewed medical journal which covers the entire field of pediatrics. The editors encourage authors to submit original articles, reviews, short communications, and correspondence on all relevant themes and topics. EJPE is particularly committed to the publication of articles on important new clinical research that will have an immediate impact on clinical pediatric practice. The editorial office very much welcomes ideas for publications, whether individual articles or article series, that fit this goal and is always willing to address inquiries from authors regarding potential submissions. Invited review articles on clinical pediatrics that provide comprehensive coverage of a subject of importance are also regularly commissioned. The short publication time reflects both the commitment of the editors and publishers and their passion for new developments in the field of pediatrics. EJPE is active on social media (@EurJPediatrics) and we invite you to participate. EJPE is the official journal of the European Academy of Paediatrics (EAP) and publishes guidelines and statements in cooperation with the EAP.
期刊最新文献
On ultrasonography for normative values of diaphragmatic and peripheral muscle function in the newborn. Neonatal critical care of the future: increasing complexity and more ethical issues. Neurological sequelae after childhood bacterial meningitis. On diaphragmatic and peripheral muscle ultrasonography in the newborn. Postpandemic fluctuations of regional respiratory syncytial virus hospitalization epidemiology: potential impact on an immunization program in Switzerland.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1