Comparison of flexible endoscopic needle-knife septotomy and peroral endoscopic myotomy for treatment of Zenker's diverticulum.

Abstract

Background and aims: Treatment of Zenker's diverticulum (ZD) has evolved from flexible endoscopic septotomy (FES) to peroral endoscopic myotomy for ZD (Z-POEM). In this study, we compare the efficacy and safety of flexible endoscopic needle-knife septotomy (FENKS) and Z-POEM for symptomatic ZD.

Methods: Consecutive patients at a single institution who underwent endoscopic ZD treatment by FENKS or Z-POEM were identified. Demographics, clinical characteristics, procedure technique, technical and clinical success, and adverse events (AEs) within 30 days were reviewed and compared between the 2 groups. AEs were classified by the AGREE classification. Baseline and postprocedure Dakkak and Bennett (DB) scores were reported at 6, 12, and 24 months. Clinical success (DB score ≤1) was assessed by per-protocol (PP) and intention-to-treat analyses (ITT).

Results: Sixty patients (55% men; mean age, 72 ± 12 years) underwent FENKS (n = 21) or Z-POEM (n = 39) between 2016 and 2023. Baseline clinical characteristics were similar, and overall technical success was 98.3%. Clinical success by PP and ITT analyses at 6, 12, and 24 months after each intervention were similar between both groups. The FENKS group had a higher prevalence (29% vs 5%, P = .018) and severity (P = .032) of AEs and were more likely to be hospitalized after treatment (71% vs 33%, P = .007). During a median follow-up of 18 months, reintervention was required for 5 cases (10%), 2 (9%) in the FENKS and 3 (7.6%) in the Z-POEM group (P = 1.0) a mean 7.6 ± 4.4 months after initial therapy.

Conclusions: Treatment of ZD with Z-POEM appears to be safer than FENKS with similar short and midterm clinical success.