Use of artificial intelligence improves colonoscopy performance in adenoma detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 6.7 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Gastrointestinal endoscopy Pub Date : 2024-08-30 DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2024.08.033
Jonathan Makar, Jonathan Abdelmalak, Danny Con, Bilal Hafeez, Mayur Garg
{"title":"Use of artificial intelligence improves colonoscopy performance in adenoma detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Jonathan Makar, Jonathan Abdelmalak, Danny Con, Bilal Hafeez, Mayur Garg","doi":"10.1016/j.gie.2024.08.033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used to improve adenoma detection during colonoscopy. This meta-analysis aimed to provide an updated evaluation of computer-aided detection (CADe) systems and their impact on key colonoscopy quality indicators.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched the EMBASE, PubMed, and MEDLINE databases from inception until February 15, 2024 for randomized control trials (RCTs) comparing the performance CADe systems with routine unassisted colonoscopy in the detection of colorectal adenomas.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-eight RCTs were selected for inclusion involving 23,861 participants. Random-effects meta-analysis demonstrated a 20% increase in adenoma detection rate (risk ratio [RR], 1.20; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.14-1.27; P < .01) and 55% decrease in adenoma miss rate (RR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.37-0.54; P < .01) with AI-assisted colonoscopy. Subgroup analyses involving only expert endoscopists demonstrated a similar effect size (RR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.11-1.27; P < .001), with similar findings seen in analysis of differing CADe systems and healthcare settings. CADe use also significantly increased adenomas per colonoscopy (weighted mean difference, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.14-0.29; P < .01), primarily because of increased diminutive lesion detection, with no significant difference seen in detection of advanced adenomas. Sessile serrated lesion detection (RR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.93-1.30; P = .27) and miss rates (RR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.16-1.19; P = .11) were similar. There was an average 0.15-minute prolongation of withdrawal time with AI-assisted colonoscopy (weighted mean difference, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.04-0.25; P = .01) and a 39% increase in the rate of non-neoplastic resection (RR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.23-1.57; P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AI-assisted colonoscopy significantly improved adenoma detection but not sessile serrated lesion detection irrespective of endoscopist experience, system type, or healthcare setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":12542,"journal":{"name":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gastrointestinal endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gie.2024.08.033","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims: Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly used to improve adenoma detection during colonoscopy. This meta-analysis aimed to provide an updated evaluation of computer-aided detection (CADe) systems and their impact on key colonoscopy quality indicators.

Methods: We searched the EMBASE, PubMed, and MEDLINE databases from inception until February 15, 2024 for randomized control trials (RCTs) comparing the performance CADe systems with routine unassisted colonoscopy in the detection of colorectal adenomas.

Results: Twenty-eight RCTs were selected for inclusion involving 23,861 participants. Random-effects meta-analysis demonstrated a 20% increase in adenoma detection rate (risk ratio [RR], 1.20; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.14-1.27; P < .01) and 55% decrease in adenoma miss rate (RR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.37-0.54; P < .01) with AI-assisted colonoscopy. Subgroup analyses involving only expert endoscopists demonstrated a similar effect size (RR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.11-1.27; P < .001), with similar findings seen in analysis of differing CADe systems and healthcare settings. CADe use also significantly increased adenomas per colonoscopy (weighted mean difference, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.14-0.29; P < .01), primarily because of increased diminutive lesion detection, with no significant difference seen in detection of advanced adenomas. Sessile serrated lesion detection (RR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.93-1.30; P = .27) and miss rates (RR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.16-1.19; P = .11) were similar. There was an average 0.15-minute prolongation of withdrawal time with AI-assisted colonoscopy (weighted mean difference, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.04-0.25; P = .01) and a 39% increase in the rate of non-neoplastic resection (RR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.23-1.57; P < .001).

Conclusions: AI-assisted colonoscopy significantly improved adenoma detection but not sessile serrated lesion detection irrespective of endoscopist experience, system type, or healthcare setting.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用人工智能提高结肠镜在腺瘤检测中的性能:系统回顾与元分析》。
背景和目的:人工智能(AI)越来越多地被用于提高结肠镜检查中腺瘤的检测率。本荟萃分析旨在对计算机辅助检测(CADe)系统及其对关键结肠镜检查质量指标的影响进行最新评估:我们在 Embase、PubMed 和 MEDLINE 数据库中检索了从开始到 2024 年 2 月 15 日的随机对照试验(RCT),比较了 CADe 系统与常规无辅助结肠镜检查在检测结直肠腺瘤方面的性能。随机效应荟萃分析表明,ADR 增加了 20%(RR 1.20,95% CI 1.14-1.27,pConclusions):无论内镜医师的经验、系统类型或医疗环境如何,人工智能辅助结肠镜检查都能显著提高腺瘤的检出率,但不能提高无柄锯齿状病变的检出率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gastrointestinal endoscopy
Gastrointestinal endoscopy 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
7.80%
发文量
1441
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: Gastrointestinal Endoscopy is a journal publishing original, peer-reviewed articles on endoscopic procedures for studying, diagnosing, and treating digestive diseases. It covers outcomes research, prospective studies, and controlled trials of new endoscopic instruments and treatment methods. The online features include full-text articles, video and audio clips, and MEDLINE links. The journal serves as an international forum for the latest developments in the specialty, offering challenging reports from authorities worldwide. It also publishes abstracts of significant articles from other clinical publications, accompanied by expert commentaries.
期刊最新文献
Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Gastro-enterostomy for Malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction: Impact of Clinical and Demographic Factors on Outcomes. The Role of Endoscopy in Pregnancy: A Review. Contents Recellularization via electroporation therapy of the duodenum combined with glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist to replace insulin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes: 12-month results of a first-in-human study Establishment and validation of a risk score model based on EUS: assessment of lymph node metastasis in early gastric cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1