Cervical Vertebra Bone Quality Score Predicts Zero-Profile Anchored Spacer Interbody Fusion Cage Subsidence after Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion: A Retrospective Study.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Global Spine Journal Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-31 DOI:10.1177/21925682241280258
Ningning Feng, Wenhao Li, Xing Yu, He Zhao, Ziye Qiu, Jianbin Guan, Guozheng Jiang, Kaitan Yang
{"title":"Cervical Vertebra Bone Quality Score Predicts Zero-Profile Anchored Spacer Interbody Fusion Cage Subsidence after Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion: A Retrospective Study.","authors":"Ningning Feng, Wenhao Li, Xing Yu, He Zhao, Ziye Qiu, Jianbin Guan, Guozheng Jiang, Kaitan Yang","doi":"10.1177/21925682241280258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Study DesignRetrospective study.ObjectiveThis retrospective study primary focus is to investigate the relationship between the C-VBQ score and the occurrence of postoperative zero-profile anchored spacer (ROI-C) interbody fusion cage subsidence. Additionally, we aim to evaluate the predictive efficacy of the C-VBQ scoring system for subsidence in the context of ACDF with the ROI-C.MethodsPatients who underwent ACDF with the ROI-C cage at our hospital between January 2016 and December 2022 were included in this study. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression were employed to identify independent risk factors associated with ROI-C cage subsidence after ACDF. Pearson correlation analysis was utilized to assess the correlation between the C-VBQ score and the height of ROI-C cage subsidence.ResultsA total of 102 patients underwent ACDF with ROI-C in our hospital were included in this study. Univariate analysis showed that age (<i>P</i> = 0.021) and C-VBQ score (<i>P</i> < 0.001) were the influencing factors of cage subsidence. Pearson correlation analysis showed that there was a significant positive correlation between the subsidence height of ROI-C cage and C-VBQ (r = 0.55, <i>P</i> < 0.01). Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis showed that C-VBQ score was the only variable that could significantly predict the subsidence of ROI-C cage after ACDF. Higher C-VBQ score was significantly associated with cage subsidence (<i>P</i> < 0.001).The AUC was 0.89, and the cutoff value for C-VBQ was 2.70.ConclusionThe findings indicate a significant correlation between a higher C-VBQ score before surgery and ROI-C cage subsidence after ACDF. The preoperative assessment of C-VBQ proves valuable for clinicians, enabling them to identify patients with low bone mineral density and predict the risk of zero-profile anchored spacer interbody fusion cage subsidence following ACDF.</p>","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"2020-2031"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11571383/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682241280258","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study DesignRetrospective study.ObjectiveThis retrospective study primary focus is to investigate the relationship between the C-VBQ score and the occurrence of postoperative zero-profile anchored spacer (ROI-C) interbody fusion cage subsidence. Additionally, we aim to evaluate the predictive efficacy of the C-VBQ scoring system for subsidence in the context of ACDF with the ROI-C.MethodsPatients who underwent ACDF with the ROI-C cage at our hospital between January 2016 and December 2022 were included in this study. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression were employed to identify independent risk factors associated with ROI-C cage subsidence after ACDF. Pearson correlation analysis was utilized to assess the correlation between the C-VBQ score and the height of ROI-C cage subsidence.ResultsA total of 102 patients underwent ACDF with ROI-C in our hospital were included in this study. Univariate analysis showed that age (P = 0.021) and C-VBQ score (P < 0.001) were the influencing factors of cage subsidence. Pearson correlation analysis showed that there was a significant positive correlation between the subsidence height of ROI-C cage and C-VBQ (r = 0.55, P < 0.01). Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis showed that C-VBQ score was the only variable that could significantly predict the subsidence of ROI-C cage after ACDF. Higher C-VBQ score was significantly associated with cage subsidence (P < 0.001).The AUC was 0.89, and the cutoff value for C-VBQ was 2.70.ConclusionThe findings indicate a significant correlation between a higher C-VBQ score before surgery and ROI-C cage subsidence after ACDF. The preoperative assessment of C-VBQ proves valuable for clinicians, enabling them to identify patients with low bone mineral density and predict the risk of zero-profile anchored spacer interbody fusion cage subsidence following ACDF.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
颈椎前路切除术和融合术后零轮廓锚定垫块椎体间融合器固定架下沉的颈椎骨质评分预测:一项回顾性研究
研究设计回顾性研究:这项回顾性研究的主要重点是调查 C-VBQ 评分与术后零轮廓锚定垫片(ROI-C)椎间融合笼下沉发生率之间的关系。此外,我们还旨在评估 C-VBQ 评分系统对使用 ROI-C 的 ACDF 下陷的预测效果:本研究纳入了2016年1月至2022年12月期间在我院接受ROI-C椎间孔成形术的患者。采用单变量分析和多变量逻辑回归确定与 ACDF 后 ROI-C cage 下沉相关的独立风险因素。利用皮尔逊相关分析评估C-VBQ评分与ROI-C笼下沉高度之间的相关性:本研究共纳入了102例在我院接受了ROI-C ACDF手术的患者。单变量分析显示,年龄(P = 0.021)和 C-VBQ 评分(P < 0.001)是笼下陷的影响因素。Pearson 相关性分析显示,ROI-C 保持架下沉高度与 C-VBQ 之间存在显著的正相关性(r = 0.55,P < 0.01)。多变量二元逻辑回归分析表明,C-VBQ 评分是唯一能显著预测 ACDF 后 ROI-C cage 下沉的变量。AUC为0.89,C-VBQ的临界值为2.70:研究结果表明,术前较高的 C-VBQ 评分与 ACDF 术后 ROI-C cage 下陷之间存在明显相关性。C-VBQ的术前评估对临床医生很有价值,可帮助他们识别骨矿密度低的患者,并预测ACDF术后零轮廓锚定垫块椎间融合器笼下沉的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Spine Journal
Global Spine Journal Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
278
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Spine Journal (GSJ) is the official scientific publication of AOSpine. A peer-reviewed, open access journal, devoted to the study and treatment of spinal disorders, including diagnosis, operative and non-operative treatment options, surgical techniques, and emerging research and clinical developments.GSJ is indexed in PubMedCentral, SCOPUS, and Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).
期刊最新文献
AO Spine Clinical Practice Recommendations: An Overview of the Current State of Fusion Surgery for Patients With Spinal Metastasis: Is Fusion Necessary? Letter to the Editor Regarding "Trends in the Prevalence of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis in a Japanese Prefecture: A 25-Year Population-Based School Screening Study Using Moire Topography". AO Spine Clinical Practice Recommendations for Adjunctive Medical Therapies in Acute Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: Contemporary Concepts. Sarcopenia as a Predictor of Mortality Following Vertebral Compression Fractures Treated With Vertebroplasty. Clinical Outcomes of Patients Who Underwent Palliative Surgery for Spinal Metastases With and Without a History of Radiation: A Multicenter Registry Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1