Clinical outcomes of first-line combination therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitor for metastatic non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a multi-institutional retrospective study in Japan.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY International Journal of Clinical Oncology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-02 DOI:10.1007/s10147-024-02612-1
Akihiro Yoshimura, Taigo Kato, Yasutomo Nakai, Masao Tsujihata, Shingo Toyoda, Mototaka Sato, Kyosuke Matsuzaki, Wataru Nakata, Tetsuya Takao, Syunsuke Inoguchi, Yohei Okuda, Gaku Yamamichi, Yu Ishizuya, Yoshiyuki Yamamoto, Koji Hatano, Atsunari Kawashima, Shingo Takada, Hitoshi Inoue, Kensaku Nishimura, Osamu Miyake, Kazutoshi Fujita, Masashi Nakayama, Kazuo Nishimura, Norio Nonomura
{"title":"Clinical outcomes of first-line combination therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitor for metastatic non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a multi-institutional retrospective study in Japan.","authors":"Akihiro Yoshimura, Taigo Kato, Yasutomo Nakai, Masao Tsujihata, Shingo Toyoda, Mototaka Sato, Kyosuke Matsuzaki, Wataru Nakata, Tetsuya Takao, Syunsuke Inoguchi, Yohei Okuda, Gaku Yamamichi, Yu Ishizuya, Yoshiyuki Yamamoto, Koji Hatano, Atsunari Kawashima, Shingo Takada, Hitoshi Inoue, Kensaku Nishimura, Osamu Miyake, Kazutoshi Fujita, Masashi Nakayama, Kazuo Nishimura, Norio Nonomura","doi":"10.1007/s10147-024-02612-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), recent studies have shown promising efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) combination therapy. However, there are insufficient evidences about clinical efficacy and safety of ICI combination therapy in metastatic non-ccRCC (nccRCC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively investigated 44 patients treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab (ICI + ICI group) or anti-PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) (ICI + TKI group), and assessed clinical efficacy in both groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of all patients, overall response rate and disease control rate for ICI combination treatments were 36.3% and 75%, respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was 8.8 and 23.9 months, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that the presence of liver metastasis significantly affected worse PFS and OS (p = 0.035 and p = 0.049). Importantly, PFS and OS seemed similar in ICI + ICI group and ICI + TKI group (p = 0.778 and p = 0.559). Although the discontinuation rate of the combination therapy due to adverse effects in patients aged ≥ 75 years was significantly higher compared to that in patients aged < 75 years (45% versus 12%, p = 0.017), there were no significant differences in PFS and OS between two groups (p = 0.290 and p = 0.257, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study confirms clinical benefit of ICI combination therapy for metastatic nccRCC patients in real-world settings. Furthermore, the effectiveness of combination therapy was comparable between patients aged < 75 and those ≥75 years with respect to clinical prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":13869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1916-1924"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11588831/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-024-02612-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), recent studies have shown promising efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) combination therapy. However, there are insufficient evidences about clinical efficacy and safety of ICI combination therapy in metastatic non-ccRCC (nccRCC).

Methods: We retrospectively investigated 44 patients treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab (ICI + ICI group) or anti-PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) (ICI + TKI group), and assessed clinical efficacy in both groups.

Results: Of all patients, overall response rate and disease control rate for ICI combination treatments were 36.3% and 75%, respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was 8.8 and 23.9 months, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that the presence of liver metastasis significantly affected worse PFS and OS (p = 0.035 and p = 0.049). Importantly, PFS and OS seemed similar in ICI + ICI group and ICI + TKI group (p = 0.778 and p = 0.559). Although the discontinuation rate of the combination therapy due to adverse effects in patients aged ≥ 75 years was significantly higher compared to that in patients aged < 75 years (45% versus 12%, p = 0.017), there were no significant differences in PFS and OS between two groups (p = 0.290 and p = 0.257, respectively).

Conclusion: This study confirms clinical benefit of ICI combination therapy for metastatic nccRCC patients in real-world settings. Furthermore, the effectiveness of combination therapy was comparable between patients aged < 75 and those ≥75 years with respect to clinical prognosis.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
转移性非透明细胞肾细胞癌与免疫检查点抑制剂一线联合治疗的临床疗效:日本一项多机构回顾性研究。
背景:在转移性透明细胞肾细胞癌(ccRCC)中,最近的研究显示免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)联合疗法具有良好的疗效。然而,对于转移性非ccRCC(nccRCC),ICI联合疗法的临床疗效和安全性还缺乏足够的证据:我们回顾性研究了44例接受尼伐单抗+伊匹单抗(ICI + ICI组)或抗PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂+酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)(ICI + TKI组)治疗的患者,并评估了两组患者的临床疗效:在所有患者中,ICI联合治疗的总体应答率和疾病控制率分别为36.3%和75%。中位无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)分别为8.8个月和23.9个月。多变量分析显示,肝转移的存在明显影响较差的PFS和OS(P = 0.035和P = 0.049)。重要的是,ICI + ICI 组和 ICI + TKI 组的 PFS 和 OS 似乎相似(p = 0.778 和 p = 0.559)。虽然年龄≥75岁的患者因不良反应而中断联合治疗的比例明显高于年龄≥75岁的患者,但这并不影响患者的治疗效果:这项研究证实了在现实世界中,ICI联合疗法对转移性nccRCC患者的临床获益。此外,年龄≥75 岁的患者与年龄≥75 岁的患者相比,联合疗法的疗效相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
3.00%
发文量
175
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Clinical Oncology (IJCO) welcomes original research papers on all aspects of clinical oncology that report the results of novel and timely investigations. Reports on clinical trials are encouraged. Experimental studies will also be accepted if they have obvious relevance to clinical oncology. Membership in the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology is not a prerequisite for submission to the journal. Papers are received on the understanding that: their contents have not been published in whole or in part elsewhere; that they are subject to peer review by at least two referees and the Editors, and to editorial revision of the language and contents; and that the Editors are responsible for their acceptance, rejection, and order of publication.
期刊最新文献
PMDA regulatory update on approval and revision of the precautions for use of anticancer drugs; approval of sacituzumab govitecan for breast cancer, fruquintinib for colorectal cancer, amivantamab for lung cancer, repotrectinib for lung cancer, tasurgratinib for biliary tract cancer, enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab for urothelial cancer, and dabrafenib plus trametinib for glioma in Japan. Real-world outcomes of FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: the JSCCR-TRIPON study. Clinical outcomes of first-line combination therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitor for metastatic non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a multi-institutional retrospective study in Japan. Out-of-pocket fertility preservation expenses: data from a Japanese nationwide multicenter survey. Genomic landscape of cutaneous, acral, mucosal, and uveal melanoma in Japan: analysis of clinical comprehensive genomic profiling data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1