Volumetric Bone Changes in Double Barrel Vascularized Fibula Flap Used for Mandibular Reconstruction: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY Journal of Craniofacial Surgery Pub Date : 2024-08-29 DOI:10.1097/SCS.0000000000010541
Hussam Ashraf Okba, Emad Saeed Helmy, Wael Mohamed Ayad, Omnyia Mohamed Abdelaziz
{"title":"Volumetric Bone Changes in Double Barrel Vascularized Fibula Flap Used for Mandibular Reconstruction: A Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Hussam Ashraf Okba, Emad Saeed Helmy, Wael Mohamed Ayad, Omnyia Mohamed Abdelaziz","doi":"10.1097/SCS.0000000000010541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>To assess the volumetric bone changes in double barrel vascularized fibular flap used for mandibular reconstruction using 3D miniplate versus 3D titanium mesh tray.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Twenty patients seeking mandibular reconstruction were selected for this 2-arm parallel randomized clinical trial with a 1:1 allocation ratio. Both groups underwent double-barrel fibula free flap for mandibular reconstruction with fixation of the superior barrel to the inferior barrel using a Titanium mesh (Group A) or a 3D plate (Group B). The primary outcome was volumetric bone changes (immediate to 6 months postoperatively).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven participants (55%) were females, and 9 participants (45%) were males. The mean age of patients in group A was (28.8±8.9) years, while group B was (30.7±11.4) years. There was a statistically significant difference within each group in the volumetric bone changes with means of -7942.1±1804.8 mm3 and -6288.8±2607.3 for groups A and B, respectively. The difference between both groups was statistically insignificant with the mean of -1653.3±1002.8 mm3. The percentage of mean volumetric change relative to immediate postoperatively for group A was -14.15%, while in group B was -11.01%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both the titanium mesh tray and the 3D plate were effective in the fixation of the superior barrel of the vascularized fibular flap for mandibular reconstruction. There was no difference between both modalities regarding volumetric bone changes.</p>","PeriodicalId":15462,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Craniofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000010541","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: To assess the volumetric bone changes in double barrel vascularized fibular flap used for mandibular reconstruction using 3D miniplate versus 3D titanium mesh tray.

Materials and methods: Twenty patients seeking mandibular reconstruction were selected for this 2-arm parallel randomized clinical trial with a 1:1 allocation ratio. Both groups underwent double-barrel fibula free flap for mandibular reconstruction with fixation of the superior barrel to the inferior barrel using a Titanium mesh (Group A) or a 3D plate (Group B). The primary outcome was volumetric bone changes (immediate to 6 months postoperatively).

Results: Eleven participants (55%) were females, and 9 participants (45%) were males. The mean age of patients in group A was (28.8±8.9) years, while group B was (30.7±11.4) years. There was a statistically significant difference within each group in the volumetric bone changes with means of -7942.1±1804.8 mm3 and -6288.8±2607.3 for groups A and B, respectively. The difference between both groups was statistically insignificant with the mean of -1653.3±1002.8 mm3. The percentage of mean volumetric change relative to immediate postoperatively for group A was -14.15%, while in group B was -11.01%.

Conclusions: Both the titanium mesh tray and the 3D plate were effective in the fixation of the superior barrel of the vascularized fibular flap for mandibular reconstruction. There was no difference between both modalities regarding volumetric bone changes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
用于下颌骨重建的双管血管化腓骨瓣的骨量变化:随机临床试验
目的:评估使用三维迷你板与三维钛网托盘进行下颌骨重建的双管血管化纤维皮瓣的骨量变化:选取 20 名寻求下颌骨重建的患者进行这项双臂平行随机临床试验,分配比例为 1:1。两组患者均接受了双管腓骨游离瓣下颌骨重建术,并使用钛网(A 组)或三维小板(B 组)将上管与下管固定。主要结果是骨量变化(术后即刻至 6 个月):11名参与者(55%)为女性,9名参与者(45%)为男性。A 组患者的平均年龄为(28.8±8.9)岁,B 组患者的平均年龄为(30.7±11.4)岁。A 组和 B 组的骨体积变化平均值分别为 -7942.1±1804.8 mm3 和 -6288.8±2607.3 mm3,两组间差异无统计学意义。两组的平均值为-1653.3±1002.8 mm3,差异无统计学意义。与术后即刻相比,A 组的平均体积变化百分比为 -14.15%,而 B 组为 -11.01%:结论:钛网托盘和三维板都能有效地固定血管化纤维瓣的上筒,用于下颌骨重建。两种方式在骨量变化方面没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
11.10%
发文量
968
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of Craniofacial Surgery serves as a forum of communication for all those involved in craniofacial surgery, maxillofacial surgery and pediatric plastic surgery. Coverage ranges from practical aspects of craniofacial surgery to the basic science that underlies surgical practice. The journal publishes original articles, scientific reviews, editorials and invited commentary, abstracts and selected articles from international journals, and occasional international bibliographies in craniofacial surgery.
期刊最新文献
Determining Chin Dimensions for Feminizing Genioplasty: An Anatomic Study. Immediately Injections of Botulinum Toxin A After Surgical Excision for Ear Keloids: A Retrospective Study. Is Artificial Intelligence a Useful Tool for Clinical Practice of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery? A Patient With Cryptococcal Meningitis Accompanied With Acute Intracranial Hypertension Treated by Ventricular Abdominal-wall Drainage. Improvement of the Facial and Dental Esthetics With Surgery-Only Approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1