{"title":"Effect of working hours on prognosis of acute ischemic stroke patients following alteplase intravenous thrombolysis.","authors":"JingDa Wang, XingYang Yi, Qian Mi","doi":"10.1177/03000605241271828","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the effect of hospital working hours on outcomes of patients with acute ischemic stroke 3 months after receiving alteplase intravenous thrombolysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was performed on 254 individuals with acute ischemic stroke who received alteplase intravenous thrombolysis between January 2018 and December 2020 either during peak hospital working hours (08:00-17:59; Group A) or off-peak hours (18:00-07:59 the following day; Group B). Patients were also categorized according to which of four peak/off-peak-hour periods they received treatment in: Group 1 (08:00-11:59), Group 2 (12:00-17:59), Group 3 (18:00-21:59), Group 4 (22:00-07:59 the following day). Baseline data and 3-month prognosis were compared across groups. Logistic regression analysis was used to investigate the correlation between hospital working hours and 3-month prognosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no significant differences in door-to-needle time, onset-to-needle time, 24-hour National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, 7-day NIHSS score or Modified Rankin Score between Groups 1 to 4 or between Groups A and B. Whether treatment was administered during peak or off-peak hours did not significantly affect 3-month prognosis.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>At this hospital, differences in the time at which stroke patients were treated were not associated with outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":16129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Medical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11375652/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03000605241271828","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the effect of hospital working hours on outcomes of patients with acute ischemic stroke 3 months after receiving alteplase intravenous thrombolysis.
Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 254 individuals with acute ischemic stroke who received alteplase intravenous thrombolysis between January 2018 and December 2020 either during peak hospital working hours (08:00-17:59; Group A) or off-peak hours (18:00-07:59 the following day; Group B). Patients were also categorized according to which of four peak/off-peak-hour periods they received treatment in: Group 1 (08:00-11:59), Group 2 (12:00-17:59), Group 3 (18:00-21:59), Group 4 (22:00-07:59 the following day). Baseline data and 3-month prognosis were compared across groups. Logistic regression analysis was used to investigate the correlation between hospital working hours and 3-month prognosis.
Results: There were no significant differences in door-to-needle time, onset-to-needle time, 24-hour National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, 7-day NIHSS score or Modified Rankin Score between Groups 1 to 4 or between Groups A and B. Whether treatment was administered during peak or off-peak hours did not significantly affect 3-month prognosis.
Conclusion: At this hospital, differences in the time at which stroke patients were treated were not associated with outcomes.
期刊介绍:
_Journal of International Medical Research_ is a leading international journal for rapid publication of original medical, pre-clinical and clinical research, reviews, preliminary and pilot studies on a page charge basis.
As a service to authors, every article accepted by peer review will be given a full technical edit to make papers as accessible and readable to the international medical community as rapidly as possible.
Once the technical edit queries have been answered to the satisfaction of the journal, the paper will be published and made available freely to everyone under a creative commons licence.
Symposium proceedings, summaries of presentations or collections of medical, pre-clinical or clinical data on a specific topic are welcome for publication as supplements.
Print ISSN: 0300-0605