Locking plate augmentation of polymethylmethacrylate-filled distal femoral defects: A biomechanical study.

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Orthopaedic Research® Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1002/jor.25965
Harrison R Ferlauto, Bruno Belanger, Alexander L Lazarides, Julia D Visgauss, Brian E Brigman, William C Eward
{"title":"Locking plate augmentation of polymethylmethacrylate-filled distal femoral defects: A biomechanical study.","authors":"Harrison R Ferlauto, Bruno Belanger, Alexander L Lazarides, Julia D Visgauss, Brian E Brigman, William C Eward","doi":"10.1002/jor.25965","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Benign, locally aggressive tumors of the distal femur are typically treated with intralesional curettage and polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) cementation. However, it is not known whether plate fixation should be added to biomechanically augment these PMMA-filled defects. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of two competing techniques for reconstruction of a distal femoral defect. For this biomechanical study, we used 12 composite femurs with properties comparable to bone. In nine femurs, identical contained medial distal femoral defects were created using a robotic arm. Group A contained three intact femurs, Group B three femurs with an unfilled defect, Group C three femurs reconstructed with PMMA alone, and Group D three femurs reconstructed with PMMA plus a medial locking plate. Locations of greatest stress concentration were determined by PhotoStress analysis, then three strain gauges were applied to each specimen at these high-stress locations. Specimens were loaded within a physiologic range followed by loading to failure. Outcome measures included construct stiffness, strain along the distal femur, and load at failure. Results showed that stiffness and strain were not significantly different between reconstructive techniques; however, both techniques reduced tensile strain along the popliteal surface by approximately 40% compared to non-reconstructed specimens. All specimens failed at the femoral neck before failing at the distal femur. These findings suggest that plate augmentation of PMMA-filled distal femoral defects like the one in this study offers insignificant biomechanical benefit within physiologic loads and therefore may be unnecessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":16650,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Research®","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Research®","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.25965","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Benign, locally aggressive tumors of the distal femur are typically treated with intralesional curettage and polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) cementation. However, it is not known whether plate fixation should be added to biomechanically augment these PMMA-filled defects. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of two competing techniques for reconstruction of a distal femoral defect. For this biomechanical study, we used 12 composite femurs with properties comparable to bone. In nine femurs, identical contained medial distal femoral defects were created using a robotic arm. Group A contained three intact femurs, Group B three femurs with an unfilled defect, Group C three femurs reconstructed with PMMA alone, and Group D three femurs reconstructed with PMMA plus a medial locking plate. Locations of greatest stress concentration were determined by PhotoStress analysis, then three strain gauges were applied to each specimen at these high-stress locations. Specimens were loaded within a physiologic range followed by loading to failure. Outcome measures included construct stiffness, strain along the distal femur, and load at failure. Results showed that stiffness and strain were not significantly different between reconstructive techniques; however, both techniques reduced tensile strain along the popliteal surface by approximately 40% compared to non-reconstructed specimens. All specimens failed at the femoral neck before failing at the distal femur. These findings suggest that plate augmentation of PMMA-filled distal femoral defects like the one in this study offers insignificant biomechanical benefit within physiologic loads and therefore may be unnecessary.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯填充股骨远端缺损的锁定钢板增量术:生物力学研究
股骨远端良性、局部侵袭性肿瘤通常采用局部刮除和聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)粘合剂治疗。然而,对于是否应添加钢板固定以从生物力学角度增强这些PMMA填充缺损,目前尚不清楚。本研究的目的是评估重建股骨远端缺损的两种竞争性技术的性能。在这项生物力学研究中,我们使用了 12 个性能与骨骼相当的复合股骨。在九个股骨中,使用机械臂创建了相同的股骨远端内侧缺损。A 组包括三个完整的股骨,B 组包括三个未填充缺损的股骨,C 组包括三个仅用 PMMA 重建的股骨,D 组包括三个用 PMMA 和内侧锁定板重建的股骨。通过光应力分析确定最大应力集中的位置,然后在这些高应力位置对每个试样施加三个应变片。在生理范围内对试样进行加载,然后加载至失效。结果测量包括结构刚度、股骨远端应变和破坏时的载荷。结果显示,重建技术之间的刚度和应变没有明显差异;但是,与未重建的标本相比,两种技术都将腘绳肌表面的拉伸应变降低了约 40%。所有标本都是在股骨颈处失效,然后才在股骨远端失效。这些研究结果表明,像本研究中这样的PMMA填充股骨远端缺损的钢板增量在生理负荷下带来的生物力学益处微乎其微,因此可能是不必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Orthopaedic Research®
Journal of Orthopaedic Research® 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
261
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Orthopaedic Research is the forum for the rapid publication of high quality reports of new information on the full spectrum of orthopaedic research, including life sciences, engineering, translational, and clinical studies.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information - Cover Issue Information - Editorial Board and TOC Osteoarthritis early-, mid- and late-stage progression in the rat medial meniscus transection model. Defining the segmental tension generated in a vertebral body tethering system for scoliosis. Gait stability improves following unilateral total ankle arthroplasty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1