Arrhythmic Risk Stratification by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy

IF 21.7 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of the American College of Cardiology Pub Date : 2024-08-30 DOI:10.1016/j.jacc.2024.06.046
{"title":"Arrhythmic Risk Stratification by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jacc.2024.06.046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Myocardial fibrosis (MF) forms part of the arrhythmic substrate for ventricular arrhythmias (VAs).</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This study sought to determine whether total myocardial fibrosis (TF) and gray zone fibrosis (GZF), assessed using cardiovascular magnetic resonance, are better than left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in predicting ventricular arrhythmias in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients with NICM in a derivation cohort (n = 866) and a validation cohort (n = 848) underwent quantification of TF and GZF. The primary composite endpoint was sudden cardiac death or VAs (ventricular fibrillation or ventricular tachycardia).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The primary endpoint was met by 52 of 866 (6.0%) patients in the derivation cohort (median follow-up: 7.5 years; Q1-Q3: 5.2-9.3 years). In competing-risks analyses, MF on visual assessment (MF<sub>VA</sub>) predicted the primary endpoint (HR: 5.83; 95% CI: 3.15-10.8). Quantified MF measures permitted categorization into 3 risk groups: a TF of &gt;0 g and ≤10 g was associated with an intermediate risk (HR: 4.03; 95% CI: 1.99-8.16), and a TF of &gt;10 g was associated with the highest risk (HR: 9.17; 95% CI: 4.64-18.1) compared to patients with no MF<sub>VA</sub> (lowest risk). Similar trends were observed in the validation cohort. Categorization into these 3 risk groups was achievable using TF or GZF in combination or in isolation. In contrast, LVEF of &lt;35% was a poor predictor of the primary endpoint (validation cohort HR: 1.99; 95% CI: 0.99-4.01).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>MF<sub>VA</sub> is a strong predictor of sudden cardiac death and VAs in NICM. TF and GZF mass added incremental value to MF<sub>VA</sub>. In contrast, LVEF was a poor discriminator of arrhythmic risk.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17187,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American College of Cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":21.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American College of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0735109724081099","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Myocardial fibrosis (MF) forms part of the arrhythmic substrate for ventricular arrhythmias (VAs).

Objectives

This study sought to determine whether total myocardial fibrosis (TF) and gray zone fibrosis (GZF), assessed using cardiovascular magnetic resonance, are better than left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in predicting ventricular arrhythmias in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM).

Methods

Patients with NICM in a derivation cohort (n = 866) and a validation cohort (n = 848) underwent quantification of TF and GZF. The primary composite endpoint was sudden cardiac death or VAs (ventricular fibrillation or ventricular tachycardia).

Results

The primary endpoint was met by 52 of 866 (6.0%) patients in the derivation cohort (median follow-up: 7.5 years; Q1-Q3: 5.2-9.3 years). In competing-risks analyses, MF on visual assessment (MFVA) predicted the primary endpoint (HR: 5.83; 95% CI: 3.15-10.8). Quantified MF measures permitted categorization into 3 risk groups: a TF of >0 g and ≤10 g was associated with an intermediate risk (HR: 4.03; 95% CI: 1.99-8.16), and a TF of >10 g was associated with the highest risk (HR: 9.17; 95% CI: 4.64-18.1) compared to patients with no MFVA (lowest risk). Similar trends were observed in the validation cohort. Categorization into these 3 risk groups was achievable using TF or GZF in combination or in isolation. In contrast, LVEF of <35% was a poor predictor of the primary endpoint (validation cohort HR: 1.99; 95% CI: 0.99-4.01).

Conclusions

MFVA is a strong predictor of sudden cardiac death and VAs in NICM. TF and GZF mass added incremental value to MFVA. In contrast, LVEF was a poor discriminator of arrhythmic risk.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过心血管磁共振成像对非缺血性心肌病患者的心律失常风险进行分层。
背景:心肌纤维化(MF)是室性心律失常(VAs)心律失常基质的一部分:本研究旨在确定在预测非缺血性心肌病(NICM)患者室性心律失常时,使用心血管磁共振评估的心肌总纤维化(TF)和灰区纤维化(GZF)是否优于左室射血分数(LVEF):对衍生队列(866 人)和验证队列(848 人)中的非缺血性心肌病患者进行 TF 和 GZF 定量。主要复合终点是心脏性猝死或VAs(心室颤动或室性心动过速):衍生队列中 866 例患者中有 52 例(6.0%)达到了主要终点(中位随访时间:7.5 年;Q1-Q3:5.2-9.3 年)。在竞争风险分析中,视觉评估中的MF(MFVA)可预测主要终点(HR:5.83;95% CI:3.15-10.8)。量化的 MF 测量值可将患者分为 3 个风险组:与无 MFVA(最低风险)的患者相比,TF >0 g 和 ≤10 g 与中等风险相关(HR:4.03;95% CI:1.99-8.16),TF >10 g 与最高风险相关(HR:9.17;95% CI:4.64-18.1)。在验证队列中也观察到类似的趋势。结合或单独使用 TF 或 GZF 均可将患者分为这 3 个风险组。结论:MFVA 是预测心脏病风险的重要指标:MFVA 是预测 NICM 中心脏性猝死和 VAs 的有力指标。TF和GZF的质量增加了MFVA的价值。相比之下,LVEF对心律失常风险的判别能力较差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
42.70
自引率
3.30%
发文量
5097
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC) publishes peer-reviewed articles highlighting all aspects of cardiovascular disease, including original clinical studies, experimental investigations with clear clinical relevance, state-of-the-art papers and viewpoints. Content Profile: -Original Investigations -JACC State-of-the-Art Reviews -JACC Review Topics of the Week -Guidelines & Clinical Documents -JACC Guideline Comparisons -JACC Scientific Expert Panels -Cardiovascular Medicine & Society -Editorial Comments (accompanying every Original Investigation) -Research Letters -Fellows-in-Training/Early Career Professional Pages -Editor’s Pages from the Editor-in-Chief or other invited thought leaders
期刊最新文献
REPLY REPLY Reply REPLY Reply
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1